Literature DB >> 27678506

Gastric Electrical Stimulation for Gastroparesis and Chronic Unexplained Nausea and Vomiting.

John M Wo1, Thomas V Nowak2, Shamaila Waseem3, Matthew P Ward4.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Gastroparesis is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome. Some patients have debilitating vomiting, weight loss, and dehydration, while others have effortless regurgitation of undigested foods or postprandial distress suggestive of functional dyspepsia. Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) has been proposed as an effective treatment option for patients with gastroparesis refractory to medical therapy. Evidence suggests that the clinically available device, a low-energy high-frequency GES, activates the vagal afferent pathways to influence the central control mechanisms for nausea and vomiting. Myoelectrical effects of the stomach are also involved. The results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for adults with diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis are conflicting. There are no RCTs in adults with chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting (CUNV) with normal gastric emptying or in children with gastroparesis. However, there is increasing evidence from large unblinded studies showing the long-term efficacy in selected adults with gastroparesis. Selection criteria should be based on three categories: (a) underlying etiology, (b) clinical presentation and predominant symptoms, and (c) potential risk for complication. Significant abdominal pain, daily opiate use, and idiopathic gastroparesis are identified as negative predictors of success. Temporary GES has been utilized to identify patients who may benefit from surgical GES, but this strategy has yet to be proven in controlled studies. Objectives for this review are to highlight the mechanisms of action for GES, to look at the evidence for clinical efficacy, and to select patients who are likely to benefit.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic unexplained nausea and vomiting; Gastric electrical stimulation; Gastroparesis; Nausea; Neurostimulation; Vomiting

Year:  2016        PMID: 27678506     DOI: 10.1007/s11938-016-0103-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1092-8472


  53 in total

1.  Effect of high-frequency gastric electrical stimulation on gastric myoelectric activity in gastroparetic patients.

Authors:  Z Lin; J Forster; I Sarosiek; R W McCallum
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Gastric electrical stimulation improves outcomes of patients with gastroparesis for up to 10 years.

Authors:  Richard W McCallum; Zhiyue Lin; Jameson Forster; Katherine Roeser; Qingjiang Hou; Irene Sarosiek
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 11.382

3.  Gastric electrical stimulation in medically refractory nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Guillaume Gourcerol; Isabelle Leblanc; Anne Marie Leroi; Philippe Denis; Philippe Ducrotte
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.566

4.  A slow caloric satiety drinking test in patients with temporary and permanent gastric electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Stina Andersson; Anders Elfvin; Gisela Ringström; Hans Lönroth; Hasse Abrahamsson; Magnus Simrén
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.566

5.  Mechanisms of symptomatic improvement after gastric electrical stimulation in gastroparetic patients.

Authors:  R W McCallum; R W Dusing; I Sarosiek; J Cocjin; J Forster; Z Lin
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Two-channel gastric pacing in patients with diabetic gastroparesis.

Authors:  Zhiyue Lin; Irene Sarosiek; Jameson Forster; Robert A Ross; Jiande D Z Chen; Richard W McCallum
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Adverse events of gastric electrical stimulators recorded in the Manufacturer and User Device Experience (MAUDE) Registry.

Authors:  Klaus Bielefeldt
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.145

8.  Preoperative predictors of significant symptomatic response after 1 year of gastric electrical stimulation for gastroparesis.

Authors:  Sandeepa Musunuru; Gretchen Beverstein; Jon Gould
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Laparoscopic gastric electrical stimulation for medically refractory diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis.

Authors:  P Timratana; K El-Hayek; H Shimizu; M Kroh; B Chand
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  An energy algorithm improves symptoms in some patients with gastroparesis and treated with gastric electrical stimulation.

Authors:  N Abidi; W L Starkebaum; T L Abell
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.598

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Gastroparesis: a turning point in understanding and treatment.

Authors:  Madhusudan Grover; Gianrico Farrugia; Vincenzo Stanghellini
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-09-28       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Neural signalling of gut mechanosensation in ingestive and digestive processes.

Authors:  Minyoo Kim; Gyuryang Heo; Sung-Yon Kim
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 38.755

3.  Gastric Electrical Stimulators Causing Erosion Through the Colonic Wall.

Authors:  Sally Condon; Aniruddh Patel; Nihar Shah; Abigail Stocker; Michael Hughes; Russell Farmer; Thomas Abell
Journal:  ACG Case Rep J       Date:  2020-03-02

4.  Study protocol for a multicentre, randomised, parallel group, sham-controlled clinical trial investigating the effect of transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation on gastrointestinal symptoms in people with diabetes complicated with diabetic autonomic neuropathy: the DAN-VNS Study.

Authors:  Tina Okdahl; Davide Bertoli; Birgitte Brock; Klaus Krogh; Filip Krag Knop; Christina Brock; Asbjørn M Drewes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.