Saul Blecker1, Joseph A Ladapo1, Kelly M Doran2, Keith S Goldfeld3, Stuart Katz4. 1. Department of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY. 2. Department of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY; Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY. 3. Department of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY. 4. Department of Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute heart failure in the emergency department (ED) or observation unit is an alternative to hospitalization. Both ED management and observation unit management have been associated with reduced costs and may be used to avoid penalties related to rehospitalizations. The purpose of this study was to examine trends in ED visits for heart failure and disposition following such visits. METHODS: We used the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a representative sample of ED visits in the United States, to estimate rates and characteristics of ED visits for heart failure between 2002 and 2010. The primary outcome was the discharge disposition from the ED. Regression models were fit to estimate trends and predictors of hospitalization and admission to an observation unit. RESULTS: The number of ED visits for heart failure remained stable over the period, from 914,739 in 2002 to 848,634 in 2010 (annual change -0.7%, 95% CI -3.7% to +2.5%). Of these visits, 74.2% led to hospitalization, wheras 3.1% led to observation unit admission. The likelihood of hospitalization did not change during the period (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.01 for each additional year), whereas admission to the observation unit increased annually (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.25). We observed significant regional differences in likelihood of hospitalization and observation admission. CONCLUSIONS: The number of ED visits for heart failure and the high proportion of ED visits with subsequent inpatient hospitalization have not changed in the last decade. Opportunities may exist to reduce hospitalizations by increasing short-term management of heart failure in the ED or observation unit.
BACKGROUND: Treatment of acute heart failure in the emergency department (ED) or observation unit is an alternative to hospitalization. Both ED management and observation unit management have been associated with reduced costs and may be used to avoid penalties related to rehospitalizations. The purpose of this study was to examine trends in ED visits for heart failure and disposition following such visits. METHODS: We used the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a representative sample of ED visits in the United States, to estimate rates and characteristics of ED visits for heart failure between 2002 and 2010. The primary outcome was the discharge disposition from the ED. Regression models were fit to estimate trends and predictors of hospitalization and admission to an observation unit. RESULTS: The number of ED visits for heart failure remained stable over the period, from 914,739 in 2002 to 848,634 in 2010 (annual change -0.7%, 95% CI -3.7% to +2.5%). Of these visits, 74.2% led to hospitalization, wheras 3.1% led to observation unit admission. The likelihood of hospitalization did not change during the period (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.01 for each additional year), whereas admission to the observation unit increased annually (adjusted prevalence ratio 1.12, 95% CI 1.01-1.25). We observed significant regional differences in likelihood of hospitalization and observation admission. CONCLUSIONS: The number of ED visits for heart failure and the high proportion of ED visits with subsequent inpatient hospitalization have not changed in the last decade. Opportunities may exist to reduce hospitalizations by increasing short-term management of heart failure in the ED or observation unit.
Authors: Michael R Bristow; Leslie A Saxon; John Boehmer; Steven Krueger; David A Kass; Teresa De Marco; Peter Carson; Lorenzo DiCarlo; David DeMets; Bill G White; Dale W DeVries; Arthur M Feldman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: W Frank Peacock; Eugene Braunwald; William Abraham; Nancy Albert; John Burnett; Rob Christenson; Sean Collins; Deborah Diercks; Greg Fonarow; Judd Hollander; Art Kellerman; Mihai Gheorghiade; Doug Kirk; Phil Levy; Alan Maisel; Barry M Massie; Christopher O'Connor; Peter Pang; Monica Shah; George Sopko; Lynne Stevenson; Alan Storrow; John Teerlink Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-07-27 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: William Franklin Peacock; Erica E Remer; Josef Aponte; Donald A Moffa; Charles E Emerman; Nancy M Albert Journal: Congest Heart Fail Date: 2002 Mar-Apr
Authors: Sean Collins; Alan B Storrow; J Douglas Kirk; Peter S Pang; Deborah B Diercks; Mihai Gheorghiade Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2007-09-14 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Austin S Kilaru; Nicholas Illenberger; Zachary F Meisel; Peter W Groeneveld; Manqing Liu; Angira Mondal; Nandita Mitra; Raina M Merchant Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2022-09-08
Authors: Camilla Strøm; Jakob S Stefansson; Maria Louise Fabritius; Lars S Rasmussen; Thomas A Schmidt; Janus C Jakobsen Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-08-13
Authors: Antonio Leon-Justel; Jose I Morgado Garcia-Polavieja; Ana Isabel Alvarez-Rios; Francisco Jose Caro Fernandez; Pedro Agustin Pajaro Merino; Elena Galvez Rios; Ignacio Vazquez-Rico; Jose Francisco Diaz Fernandez Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2021-05-08 Impact factor: 3.186