Literature DB >> 25458151

Hybrid neuromusculoskeletal modeling to best track joint moments using a balance between muscle excitations derived from electromyograms and optimization.

Massimo Sartori, Dario Farina, David G Lloyd.   

Abstract

Current electromyography (EMG)-driven musculoskeletal models are used to estimate joint moments measured from an individual׳s extremities during dynamic movement with varying levels of accuracy. The main benefit is the underlying musculoskeletal dynamics is simulated as a function of realistic, subject-specific, neural-excitation patterns provided by the EMG data. The main disadvantage is surface EMG cannot provide information on deeply located muscles. Furthermore, EMG data may be affected by cross-talk, recording and post-processing artifacts that could adversely influence the EMG׳s information content. This limits the EMG-driven model׳s ability to calculate the multi-muscle dynamics and the resulting joint moments about multiple degrees of freedom. We present a hybrid neuromusculoskeletal model that combines calibration, subject-specificity, EMG-driven and static optimization methods together. In this, the joint moment tracking errors are minimized by balancing the information content extracted from the experimental EMG data and from that generated by a static optimization method. Using movement data from five healthy male subjects during walking and running we explored the hybrid model׳s best configuration to minimally adjust recorded EMGs and predict missing EMGs while attaining the best tracking of joint moments. Minimally adjusted and predicted excitations substantially improved the experimental joint moment tracking accuracy than current EMG-driven models. The ability of the hybrid model to predict missing muscle EMGs was also examined. The proposed hybrid model enables muscle-driven simulations of human movement while enforcing physiological constraints on muscle excitation patterns. This might have important implications for studying pathological movement for which EMG recordings are limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25458151     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  32 in total

1.  Modeling and simulating the neuromuscular mechanisms regulating ankle and knee joint stiffness during human locomotion.

Authors:  Massimo Sartori; Marco Maculan; Claudio Pizzolato; Monica Reggiani; Dario Farina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  EMG-Informed Musculoskeletal Modeling to Estimate Realistic Knee Anterior Shear Force During Drop Vertical Jump in Female Athletes.

Authors:  Alessandro Navacchia; Ryo Ueno; Kevin R Ford; Christopher A DiCesare; Gregory D Myer; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Multiscale musculoskeletal modelling, data-model fusion and electromyography-informed modelling.

Authors:  J Fernandez; J Zhang; T Heidlauf; M Sartori; T Besier; O Röhrle; D Lloyd
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Knee abduction moment is predicted by lower gluteus medius force and larger vertical and lateral ground reaction forces during drop vertical jump in female athletes.

Authors:  Ryo Ueno; Alessandro Navacchia; Christopher A DiCesare; Kevin R Ford; Gregory D Myer; Tomoya Ishida; Harukazu Tohyama; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Estimating Knee Joint Load Using Acoustic Emissions During Ambulation.

Authors:  Keaton L Scherpereel; Nicholas B Bolus; Hyeon Ki Jeong; Omer T Inan; Aaron J Young
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Electromyography-Driven Forward Dynamics Simulation to Estimate In Vivo Joint Contact Forces During Normal, Smooth, and Bouncy Gaits.

Authors:  Swithin S Razu; Trent M Guess
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  CEINMS: A toolbox to investigate the influence of different neural control solutions on the prediction of muscle excitation and joint moments during dynamic motor tasks.

Authors:  Claudio Pizzolato; David G Lloyd; Massimo Sartori; Elena Ceseracciu; Thor F Besier; Benjamin J Fregly; Monica Reggiani
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  The future of upper extremity rehabilitation robotics: research and practice.

Authors:  Philip P Vu; Cynthia A Chestek; Samuel R Nason; Theodore A Kung; Stephen W P Kemp; Paul S Cederna
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.217

9.  Analysis of fluid movement in skeletal muscle using fluorescent microspheres.

Authors:  Loribeth Q Evertz; Sarah M Greising; Duane A Morrow; Gary C Sieck; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.217

10.  ILIOTIBIAL BAND SYNDROME IN CYCLING: A COMBINED EXPERIMENTAL-SIMULATION APPROACH FOR ASSESSING THE EFFECT OF SADDLE SETBACK.

Authors:  Mathieu Ménard; Patrick Lacouture; Mathieu Domalain
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.