Literature DB >> 25457318

Fractures and fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus: A retrospective analysis of 82 cases treated with the Philos(®) locking plate.

Rocco Erasmo1, Giovanni Guerra2, Luigi Guerra3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To present the experience in a single institution of the management of 82 consecutive fractures and fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus treated with the Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (Philos(®)) plate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 81 patients with 82 proximal humerus fractures (one patient had bilateral fracture) were treated at our institution with open reduction and internal fixation with Philos(®) plate from January 2008 to December 2012 and the clinico-radiological outcome was analysed. Twelve of these patients also had a dislocation of the proximal humerus. According to the Neer classification, there were seven two-part fractures, 40 three-part fractures and 35 four-part fractures. All patients received a similar physical therapy programme following internal fixation. Mean final follow-up was 32 months. Functional outcome was evaluated for each patient using the Constant-Murley score; radiographic evaluation was also conducted and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: At the end of the follow-up period, the mean Constant-Murley score for the injured side was 75 points (range 42-92); results were graded as excellent for eight patients, good for 52, moderate for 17 and poor for five. Twenty-three patients (28%) had complications during the follow-up period. Reoperation was required in 12 patients. Complications included avascular necrosis of the humeral head in 10 patients (12%), varus positioning of the head in four patients (4.8%), impingement syndrome in three patients (3.6%), secondary screw perforation in three patients (3.6%), non-union of the fracture in two patients (2.4%) and infection in one patient (1.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with the Philos(®) plate was associated with good clinical outcomes provided the correct surgical technique was used. To better evaluate the real incidence of complications, it is important to follow patients for more than one year after surgery as some complications may arise after this time.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone plates; Fracture fixation; Humerus/injuries; Internal/methods; Shoulder fractures/surgery; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25457318     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  19 in total

1.  Cadaveric study of the anatomical reference points for proximal humeral plate positioning.

Authors:  Kittikun Thienthong; Manusak Boonard; Artit Boonrod; Kowit Chaisiwamongkol; Suwitcha Sripadungkul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-04-24

Review 2.  [Posttraumatic nonunions and malunions of the proximal humerus. Possibilities and limitations of corrective osteotomy].

Authors:  R Meller; N Hawi; U Schmiddem; P J Millett; M Petri; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation for Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly.

Authors:  Daniel C Austin; Michael T Torchia; Anna N A Tosteson; I Leah Gitajn; Stephanie J Tapp; John-Erik Bell
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

4.  No change in outcome ten years following locking plate repair of displaced proximal humerus fractures.

Authors:  Rachel Ranson; Rachel Roller; Nicket Dedhia; Connor P Littlefield; Sanjit Konda; Joseph D Zuckerman; Kenneth Egol
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-08-20

5.  CORR® Synthesis: What Is the Role of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Patients Older Than 65 Years?

Authors:  Michael A Boin; Mandeep S Virk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Postoperative Evaluation of Reduction Loss in Proximal Humeral Fractures: A Comparison of Plain Radiographs and Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Xiao-Yang Jia; Yan-Xi Chen; Min-Fei Qiang; Kun Zhang; Hao-Bo Li; Yu-Chen Jiang; Yi-Jie Zhang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.071

7.  Proximal humerus fracture-dislocation managed by mini-open reduction and percutaneous screw fixation.

Authors:  N A Johnson; R Pandey
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-08

8.  Comparison of "Bilboquet" device and locking plate for surgical treatment of proximal humerus complex fractures at two years follow-up.

Authors:  Yaniv Bismuth; Adeline Cambon-Binder; Alain Sautet; Levon Doursounian; Thomas Gregory; Claire Bastard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Complication rate after operative treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: locking plate osteosynthesis versus proximal humeral nail.

Authors:  Greta Lorenz; Wolfgang Schönthaler; Wolfgang Huf; Micha Komjati; Christian Fialka; Sandra Boesmueller
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.693

10.  Iatrogenic fracture during shoulder dislocation reduction: characteristics, management and outcomes.

Authors:  Xiaohui Pan; Yong Yao; Hongyong Yan; Jun Wang; Lei Dai; Xincong Qu; Zuyi Fang; Feng Feng; Yan Zhou
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.175

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.