Literature DB >> 25454974

Postoperative pancreatic fistula after robot distal gastrectomy.

Ho Seok Seo1, Jung Ho Shim1, Hae Myung Jeon1, Cho Hyun Park1, Kyo Young Song2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the incidences of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) between robot-assisted distal gastrectomy (RADG) and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 patients with gastric cancer who underwent RADG were compared with 40 initial patients who underwent LADG by a single surgeon. We evaluated and compared the clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical outcomes, and operative complications including POPF in two groups.
RESULTS: The POPF was observed more frequently in the LADG group than in the RADG group (22.5% versus 10%, P < 0.001). Although the serum amylase levels in the 20 first-half cases did not statistically differ between LADG and RADG (P = 0.32), those in the 20 latter-half cases were significantly lower in the RADG group (P < 0.05). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified laparoscopic surgery and visceral fat area as POPF-associated risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: RADG is feasible and safe for distal gastrectomy in terms of POPF.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric cancer; Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy; Postoperative pancreatic fistula; Robot-assisted distal gastrectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25454974     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  24 in total

1.  Late phase II study of robot-assisted gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Rie Makuuchi; Yuiciro Miki; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer: a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study.

Authors:  Ichiro Uyama; Koichi Suda; Masaya Nakauchi; Takahiro Kinoshita; Hirokazu Noshiro; Shuji Takiguchi; Kazuhisa Ehara; Kazutaka Obama; Shiro Kuwabara; Hiroshi Okabe; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 3.  Robotic surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Terashima; Masanori Tokunaga; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taaichi Kawamura; Yuichiro Miki; Rie Makuuchi; Shinsaku Honda; Taichi Tatsubayashi; Wataru Takagi; Hayato Omori; Fumiko Hirata
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Authors:  Yoo Min Kim; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-04

Review 5.  Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Akio Kaito; Shizuki Sugita; Masahiro Watanabe; Hideki Sunagawa; Takahiro Kinoshita
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-06-02

6.  Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for cT1 Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Makoto Hikage; Masanori Tokunaga; Rie Makuuchi; Tomoyuki Irino; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Pancreas-related complications following gastrectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of open versus minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Francesco Guerra; Giuseppe Giuliani; Martina Iacobone; Paolo Pietro Bianchi; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  The anatomical location of the pancreas is associated with the incidence of pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic gastrectomy.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Migita; Sohei Matsumoto; Kohei Wakatsuki; Masahiro Ito; Tomohiro Kunishige; Hiroshi Nakade; Mitsuhiro Nakatani; Mutsuko Kitano; Yoshiyuki Nakajima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Morbidity and short-term surgical outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large cohort study.

Authors:  Li Zheng-Yan; Zhao Yong-Liang; Qian Feng; Shi Yan; Yu Pei-Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: single Western center results.

Authors:  Luigi Marano; Alessia D'Ignazio; Luca Resca; Daniele Marrelli; Franco Roviello
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.