Literature DB >> 25454246

Neonicotinoid contamination of global surface waters and associated risk to aquatic invertebrates: a review.

Christy A Morrissey1, Pierre Mineau2, James H Devries3, Francisco Sanchez-Bayo4, Matthias Liess5, Michael C Cavallaro6, Karsten Liber7.   

Abstract

Neonicotinoids, broad-spectrum systemic insecticides, are the fastest growing class of insecticides worldwide and are now registered for use on hundreds of field crops in over 120 different countries. The environmental profile of this class of pesticides indicate that they are persistent, have high leaching and runoff potential, and are highly toxic to a wide range of invertebrates. Therefore, neonicotinoids represent a significant risk to surface waters and the diverse aquatic and terrestrial fauna that these ecosystems support. This review synthesizes the current state of knowledge on the reported concentrations of neonicotinoids in surface waters from 29 studies in 9 countries world-wide in tandem with published data on their acute and chronic toxicity to 49 species of aquatic insects and crustaceans spanning 12 invertebrate orders. Strong evidence exists that water-borne neonicotinoid exposures are frequent, long-term and at levels (geometric means=0.13μg/L (averages) and 0.63μg/L (maxima)) which commonly exceed several existing water quality guidelines. Imidacloprid is by far the most widely studied neonicotinoid (66% of the 214 toxicity tests reviewed) with differences in sensitivity among aquatic invertebrate species ranging several orders of magnitude; other neonicotinoids display analogous modes of action and similar toxicities, although comparative data are limited. Of the species evaluated, insects belonging to the orders Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera and Diptera appear to be the most sensitive, while those of Crustacea (although not universally so) are less sensitive. In particular, the standard test species Daphnia magna appears to be very tolerant, with 24-96hour LC50 values exceeding 100,000μg/L (geometric mean>44,000μg/L), which is at least 2-3 orders of magnitude higher than the geometric mean of all other invertebrate species tested. Overall, neonicotinoids can exert adverse effects on survival, growth, emergence, mobility, and behavior of many sensitive aquatic invertebrate taxa at concentrations at or below 1μg/L under acute exposure and 0.1μg/L for chronic exposure. Using probabilistic approaches (species sensitivity distributions), we recommend here that ecological thresholds for neonicotinoid water concentrations need to be below 0.2μg/L (short-term acute) or 0.035μg/L (long-term chronic) to avoid lasting effects on aquatic invertebrate communities. The application of safety factors may still be warranted considering potential issues of slow recovery, additive or synergistic effects and multiple stressors that can occur in the field. Our analysis revealed that 81% (22/27) and 74% (14/19) of global surface water studies reporting maximum and average individual neonicotinoid concentrations respectively, exceeded these thresholds of 0.2 and 0.035μg/L. Therefore, it appears that environmentally relevant concentrations of neonicotinoids in surface waters worldwide are well within the range where both short- and long-term impacts on aquatic invertebrate species are possible over broad spatial scales.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic invertebrates; Neonicotinoids; Pesticides; Risk assessment; Species sensitivity distribution; Water quality guidelines

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25454246     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  88 in total

1.  Expanded Target-Chemical Analysis Reveals Extensive Mixed-Organic-Contaminant Exposure in U.S. Streams.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Celeste A Journey; Kristin M Romanok; Larry B Barber; Herbert T Buxton; William T Foreman; Edward T Furlong; Susan T Glassmeyer; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Daniel K Jones; Dana W Kolpin; Kathryn M Kuivila; Keith A Loftin; Marc A Mills; Michael T Meyer; James L Orlando; Timothy J Reilly; Kelly L Smalling; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  A synoptic survey of select wastewater-tracer compounds and the pesticide imidacloprid in Florida's ambient freshwaters.

Authors:  James Silvanima; Andy Woeber; Stephanie Sunderman-Barnes; Rick Copeland; Christopher Sedlacek; Thomas Seal
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Agricultural insecticides threaten surface waters at the global scale.

Authors:  Sebastian Stehle; Ralf Schulz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Catchment land use-dependent effects of barrage fishponds on the functioning of headwater streams.

Authors:  Brian Four; Evelyne Arce; Michaël Danger; Juliette Gaillard; Marielle Thomas; Damien Banas
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-27       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Evaluation of FOCUS surface water pesticide concentration predictions and risk assessment of field-measured pesticide mixtures-a crop-based approach under Mediterranean conditions.

Authors:  Ana Santos Pereira; Michiel A Daam; Maria José Cerejeira
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Fate and transport of furrow-applied granular tefluthrin and seed-coated clothianidin insecticides: Comparison of field-scale observations and model estimates.

Authors:  Kara E Huff Hartz; Tracye M Edwards; Michael J Lydy
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Metabolism, bioaccumulation, and toxicity of pesticides in aquatic insect larvae.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Katagi; Hitoshi Tanaka
Journal:  J Pestic Sci       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 1.519

8.  Pigmentiphaga sp. Strain D-2 Uses a Novel Amidase To Initiate the Catabolism of the Neonicotinoid Insecticide Acetamiprid.

Authors:  Hongxing Yang; Shunli Hu; Xiang Wang; Shaochuang Chuang; Weibin Jia; Jiandong Jiang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Multi-scale availability of neonicotinoid-treated seed for wildlife in an agricultural landscape during spring planting.

Authors:  Charlotte L Roy; Pamela L Coy; Da Chen; Julia Ponder; Mark Jankowski
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Acaricidal property of the essential oil from Lippia gracilis against Tetranychus urticae and a natural enemy, Neoseiulus californicus, under greenhouse conditions.

Authors:  Flávia de Souza Born; Claudio Augusto Gomes da Camara; João Paulo Ramos de Melo; Marcilio Martins de Moraes
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.