Literature DB >> 29951939

A synoptic survey of select wastewater-tracer compounds and the pesticide imidacloprid in Florida's ambient freshwaters.

James Silvanima1, Andy Woeber2, Stephanie Sunderman-Barnes2, Rick Copeland2, Christopher Sedlacek2, Thomas Seal2.   

Abstract

Current wastewater treatment technologies do not remove many unregulated hydrophilic compounds, and there is growing interest that low levels of these compounds, referred to as emerging contaminants, may impact human health and the environment. A probabilistic-designed monitoring network was employed to infer the extent of Florida's ambient freshwaters containing the wastewater (Includes reuse water, septic systems leachate, and wastewater treatment effluent.) indicators sucralose, acetaminophen, carbamazepine, and primidone and those containing the widely used pesticide imidacloprid. Extent estimates with 95% confidence bounds are provided for canals, rivers, streams, small and large lakes, and unconfined aquifers containing ultra-trace concentrations of these compounds as based on analyses of 2015 sample surveys utilizing 528 sites. Sucralose is estimated to occur in greater than 50% of the canal, river, stream, and large lake resource extents. The pharmaceuticals acetaminophen, carbamazepine, and primidone are most prevalent in rivers, with approximately 30% of river kilometers estimated to contain at least one of these compounds. Imidacloprid is estimated to occur in 50% or greater of the canal and river resource extents, and it is the only compound found to exceed published toxicity or environmental effects standards. Geospatial analyses show sucralose detection frequencies within Florida's drainage basins to be significantly related to the percentage of urban land use (R2 = 0.36, p < 0.001), and imidacloprid detection frequencies to be significantly related to the percentage of urban and agricultural land use (R2 = 0.47, p < 0.001). The extent of the presence of these compounds highlights the need for additional emerging contaminant studies especially those examining effects on aquatic biota.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ambient water resource; Emerging contaminant; Imidacloprid; Probabilistic monitoring; Wastewater indicator

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29951939     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-018-6782-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  27 in total

1.  Fate of pharmaceuticals during indirect potable reuse.

Authors:  J E Drewes; T Heberer; K Reddersen
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.915

2.  Expanded Target-Chemical Analysis Reveals Extensive Mixed-Organic-Contaminant Exposure in U.S. Streams.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Celeste A Journey; Kristin M Romanok; Larry B Barber; Herbert T Buxton; William T Foreman; Edward T Furlong; Susan T Glassmeyer; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Daniel K Jones; Dana W Kolpin; Kathryn M Kuivila; Keith A Loftin; Marc A Mills; Michael T Meyer; James L Orlando; Timothy J Reilly; Kelly L Smalling; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Aquatic toxicity of acetaminophen, carbamazepine, cimetidine, diltiazem and six major sulfonamides, and their potential ecological risks in Korea.

Authors:  Younghee Kim; Kyungho Choi; Jinyong Jung; Sujung Park; Pan-Gyi Kim; Jeongim Park
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 9.621

4.  Complex mixtures of dissolved pesticides show potential aquatic toxicity in a synoptic study of Midwestern U.S. streams.

Authors:  Lisa H Nowell; Patrick W Moran; Travis S Schmidt; Julia E Norman; Naomi Nakagaki; Megan E Shoda; Barbara J Mahler; Peter C Van Metre; Wesley W Stone; Mark W Sandstrom; Michelle L Hladik
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 5.  Neonicotinoids in the Canadian aquatic environment: a literature review on current use products with a focus on fate, exposure, and biological effects.

Authors:  J C Anderson; C Dubetz; V P Palace
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 6.  Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil.

Authors:  J-M Bonmatin; C Giorio; V Girolami; D Goulson; D P Kreutzweiser; C Krupke; M Liess; E Long; M Marzaro; E A D Mitchell; D A Noome; N Simon-Delso; A Tapparo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Environmental Risks and Challenges Associated with Neonicotinoid Insecticides.

Authors:  Michelle L Hladik; Anson R Main; Dave Goulson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Neonicotinoid insecticides negatively affect performance measures of non-target terrestrial arthropods: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anson R Main; Elisabeth B Webb; Keith W Goyne; Doreen Mengel
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 4.657

9.  DrugBank: a comprehensive resource for in silico drug discovery and exploration.

Authors:  David S Wishart; Craig Knox; An Chi Guo; Savita Shrivastava; Murtaza Hassanali; Paul Stothard; Zhan Chang; Jennifer Woolsey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Artificial sweeteners in a large Canadian river reflect human consumption in the watershed.

Authors:  John Spoelstra; Sherry L Schiff; Susan J Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Regional extent, environmental relevance, and spatiotemporal variability of neonicotinoid insecticides detected in Florida's ambient flowing waters.

Authors:  James Silvanima; Stephanie Sunderman-Barnes; Rick Copeland; Andy Woeber; Elizabeth Miller
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.307

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.