Literature DB >> 25453953

Ornamenting 3D printed scaffolds with cell-laid extracellular matrix for bone tissue regeneration.

Falguni Pati1, Tae-Ha Song1, Girdhari Rijal1, Jinah Jang2, Sung Won Kim3, Dong-Woo Cho4.   

Abstract

3D printing technique is the most sophisticated technique to produce scaffolds with tailorable physical properties. But, these scaffolds often suffer from limited biological functionality as they are typically made from synthetic materials. Cell-laid mineralized ECM was shown to be potential for improving the cellular responses and drive osteogenesis of stem cells. Here, we intend to improve the biological functionality of 3D-printed synthetic scaffolds by ornamenting them with cell-laid mineralized extracellular matrix (ECM) that mimics a bony microenvironment. We developed bone graft substitutes by using 3D printed scaffolds made from a composite of polycaprolactone (PCL), poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA), and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) and mineralized ECM laid by human nasal inferior turbinate tissue-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hTMSCs). A rotary flask bioreactor was used to culture hTMSCs on the scaffolds to foster formation of mineralized ECM. A freeze/thaw cycle in hypotonic buffer was used to efficiently decellularize (97% DNA reduction) the ECM-ornamented scaffolds while preserving its main organic and inorganic components. The ECM-ornamented 3D printed scaffolds supported osteoblastic differentiation of newly-seeded hTMSCs by upregulating four typical osteoblastic genes (4-fold higher RUNX2; 3-fold higher ALP; 4-fold higher osteocalcin; and 4-fold higher osteopontin) and increasing calcium deposition compared to bare 3D printed scaffolds. In vivo, in ectopic and orthotopic models in rats, ECM-ornamented scaffolds induced greater bone formation than that of bare scaffolds. These results suggest a valuable method to produce ECM-ornamented 3D printed scaffolds as off-the-shelf bone graft substitutes that combine tunable physical properties with physiological presentation of biological signals.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printed scaffolds; Bone regeneration; Cell-laid extracellular matrix; Osteoconduction; Osteoinduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25453953     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  51 in total

1.  3D printed composite scaffolds with dual small molecule delivery for mandibular bone regeneration.

Authors:  Wenhai Zhang; Wen Shi; Shaohua Wu; Mitchell Kuss; Xiping Jiang; Jason B Untrauer; St Patrick Reid; Bin Duan
Journal:  Biofabrication       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 9.954

2.  Co-culture cell-derived extracellular matrix loaded electrospun microfibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Marta S Carvalho; João C Silva; Ranodhi N Udangawa; Joaquim M S Cabral; Frederico Castelo Ferreira; Cláudia L da Silva; Robert J Linhardt; Deepak Vashishth
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 3.  Microfluidic devices for disease modeling in muscle tissue.

Authors:  Mollie M Smoak; Hannah A Pearce; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Fa-Ming Chen; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 29.190

5.  Enhancing cell seeding and osteogenesis of MSCs on 3D printed scaffolds through injectable BMP2 immobilized ECM-Mimetic gel.

Authors:  Farahnaz Fahimipour; Erfan Dashtimoghadam; Mohammad Mahdi Hasani-Sadrabadi; Jessica Vargas; Daryoosh Vashaee; Douglas C Lobner; Tahereh S Jafarzadeh Kashi; Behnam Ghasemzadeh; Lobat Tayebi
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Composite 3D printed scaffold with structured electrospun nanofibers promotes chondrocyte adhesion and infiltration.

Authors:  M Rampichová; E Košt'áková Kuželová; E Filová; J Chvojka; J Šafka; M Pelcl; J Daňková; E Prosecká; M Buzgo; M Plencner; D Lukáš; E Amler
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues.

Authors:  Christian Mandrycky; Zongjie Wang; Keekyoung Kim; Deok-Ho Kim
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 14.227

8.  Growth Factor Dose Tuning for Bone Progenitor Cell Proliferation and Differentiation on Resorbable Poly(propylene fumarate) Scaffolds.

Authors:  Ruchi Mishra; Ryan S Sefcik; Tyler J Bishop; Stefani M Montelone; Nisha Crouser; Jean F Welter; Arnold I Caplan; David Dean
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 9.  Review of the Applications of Biomedical Compositions Containing Hydroxyapatite and Collagen Modified by Bioactive Components.

Authors:  Agnieszka Sobczak-Kupiec; Anna Drabczyk; Wioletta Florkiewicz; Magdalena Głąb; Sonia Kudłacik-Kramarczyk; Dagmara Słota; Agnieszka Tomala; Bożena Tyliszczak
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 10.  Bridging the Gap: From 2D Cell Culture to 3D Microengineered Extracellular Matrices.

Authors:  Yanfen Li; Kristopher A Kilian
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 9.933

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.