Literature DB >> 29130836

Composite 3D printed scaffold with structured electrospun nanofibers promotes chondrocyte adhesion and infiltration.

M Rampichová1,2, E Košt'áková Kuželová3, E Filová2, J Chvojka3, J Šafka4, M Pelcl3, J Daňková2, E Prosecká2, M Buzgo1, M Plencner2, D Lukáš3, E Amler1,2.   

Abstract

Additive manufacturing, also called 3D printing, is an effective method for preparing scaffolds with defined structure and porosity. The disadvantage of the technique is the excessive smoothness of the printed fibers, which does not support cell adhesion. In the present study, a 3D printed scaffold was combined with electrospun classic or structured nanofibers to promote cell adhesion. Structured nanofibers were used to improve the infiltration of cells into the scaffold. Electrospun layers were connected to 3D printed fibers by gluing, thus enabling the fabrication of scaffolds with unlimited thickness. The composite 3D printed/nanofibrous scaffolds were seeded with primary chondrocytes and tested in vitro for cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation. The experiment showed excellent cell infiltration, viability, and good cell proliferation. On the other hand, partial chondrocyte dedifferentiation was shown. Other materials supporting chondrogenic differentiation will be investigated in future studies.

Keywords:  3D printing; cell infiltration; chondrocytes; electrospinning; nanofibres

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29130836      PMCID: PMC6149432          DOI: 10.1080/19336918.2017.1385713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Adh Migr        ISSN: 1933-6918            Impact factor:   3.405


  33 in total

1.  The cleavage of N-cadherin is essential for chondrocyte differentiation.

Authors:  Shigeto Nakazora; Akihiko Matsumine; Takahiro Iino; Masahiro Hasegawa; Ayae Kinoshita; Kengo Uemura; Rui Niimi; Atsumasa Uchida; Akihiro Sudo
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  Introducing a 3-dimensionally Printed, Tissue-Engineered Graft for Airway Reconstruction: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Todd A Goldstein; Benjamin D Smith; David Zeltsman; Daniel Grande; Lee P Smith
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 3.  Three-dimensional bioprinting in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Guifang Gao; Xiaofeng Cui
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.461

4.  Medical Applications for 3D Printing: Current and Projected Uses.

Authors:  C Lee Ventola
Journal:  P T       Date:  2014-10

5.  Elastic three-dimensional poly (ε-caprolactone) nanofibre scaffold enhances migration, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  M Rampichová; J Chvojka; M Buzgo; E Prosecká; P Mikeš; L Vysloužilová; D Tvrdík; P Kochová; T Gregor; D Lukáš; E Amler
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 6.831

6.  Preparation of poly(ε-caprolactone)-based tissue engineering scaffolds by stereolithography.

Authors:  Laura Elomaa; Sandra Teixeira; Risto Hakala; Harri Korhonen; Dirk W Grijpma; Jukka V Seppälä
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  Phage nanofibers induce vascularized osteogenesis in 3D printed bone scaffolds.

Authors:  Jianglin Wang; Mingying Yang; Ye Zhu; Lin Wang; Antoni P Tomsia; Chuanbin Mao
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 30.849

8.  Effect of fiber diameter on spreading, proliferation, and differentiation of osteoblastic cells on electrospun poly(lactic acid) substrates.

Authors:  Anand S Badami; Michelle R Kreke; M Shane Thompson; Judy S Riffle; Aaron S Goldstein
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 9.  Bone formation via cartilage models: the "borderline" chondrocyte.

Authors:  P Bianco; F D Cancedda; M Riminucci; R Cancedda
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 11.583

10.  Redifferentiation of dedifferentiated human chondrocytes in high-density cultures.

Authors:  G Schulze-Tanzil; P de Souza; H Villegas Castrejon; T John; H-J Merker; A Scheid; M Shakibaei
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Strategies to Tune Electrospun Scaffold Porosity for Effective Cell Response in Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Jimna Mohamed Ameer; Anil Kumar Pr; Naresh Kasoju
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2019-07-09

2.  A step toward engineering thick tissues: Distributing microfibers within 3D printed frames.

Authors:  Joseph Molde; Joseph A M Steele; Alexandra K Pastino; Anisha Mahat; N Sanjeeva Murthy; Joachim Kohn
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 4.396

3.  Influence of surface topography on PCL electrospun scaffolds for liver tissue engineering.

Authors:  Yunxi Gao; Anthony Callanan
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 6.331

4.  Effect of electrohydrodynamic printing scaffold with different spacing on chondrocyte dedifferentiation.

Authors:  Xincheng Liu; Zhao Zhang; Yubo Shi; Xingxing Meng; Zhennan Qiu; Xiaoli Qu; Jingyi Dang; Yushen Zhang; Liguo Sun; Lei Wang; Dongze Zhu; Zhenzhou Mi; Jiankang He; Hongbin Fan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-07

Review 5.  3D Electrospun Nanofiber-Based Scaffolds: From Preparations and Properties to Tissue Regeneration Applications.

Authors:  Shanshan Han; Kexin Nie; Jingchao Li; Qingqing Sun; Xiaofeng Wang; Xiaomeng Li; Qian Li
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 6.  Bioinks and bioprinting technologies to make heterogeneous and biomimetic tissue constructs.

Authors:  N Ashammakhi; S Ahadian; C Xu; H Montazerian; H Ko; R Nasiri; N Barros; A Khademhosseini
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2019-05-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.