UNLABELLED: A prominent feature of many human cancers is oncogene-driven activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) during early tumorigenesis. It has been shown previously that noninvasive imaging of the phosphorylated histone H2A variant H2AX, γH2AX, a DNA damage signaling protein, is possible using (111)In-labeled anti-γH2AX antibody conjugated to the cell-penetrating peptide transactivator of transcription (TAT). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT detects the DDR during mammary oncogenesis in BALB-neuT mice. METHODS: Mammary fat pads from BALB-neuT and wild-type mice (age, 40-106 d) were immunostained for γH2AX. (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT or a control probe was administered intravenously to BALB-neuT mice. SPECT was performed weekly and compared with tumor detection using palpation and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. RESULTS: γH2AX expression was elevated in hyperplastic lesions in the mammary fat pads of BALB-neuT mice aged 76-106 d, compared with normal fat pads from younger mice and carcinomas from older mice (13.5 ± 1.2 γH2AX foci/cell vs. 5.2 ± 1.5 [P < 0.05] and 3.4 ± 1.1 [P < 0.001], respectively). Serial SPECT imaging revealed a 2.5-fold increase in (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT accumulation in the mammary fat pads of mice aged 76-106 d, compared with control probe (P = 0.01). The median time to detection of neoplastic lesions by (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT (defined as >5% injected dose per gram of tissue) was 96 d, compared with 120 and 131 d for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and palpation, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: DDR imaging using (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT identified mammary tumors significantly earlier than MR imaging. Imaging the DDR holds promise for the detection of preneoplasia and as a technique for screening cancer-prone individuals.
UNLABELLED: A prominent feature of many humancancers is oncogene-driven activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) during early tumorigenesis. It has been shown previously that noninvasive imaging of the phosphorylated histone H2A variant H2AX, γH2AX, a DNA damage signaling protein, is possible using (111)In-labeled anti-γH2AX antibody conjugated to the cell-penetrating peptide transactivator of transcription (TAT). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT detects the DDR during mammary oncogenesis in BALB-neuT mice. METHODS: Mammary fat pads from BALB-neuT and wild-type mice (age, 40-106 d) were immunostained for γH2AX. (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT or a control probe was administered intravenously to BALB-neuT mice. SPECT was performed weekly and compared with tumor detection using palpation and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. RESULTS: γH2AX expression was elevated in hyperplastic lesions in the mammary fat pads of BALB-neuT mice aged 76-106 d, compared with normal fat pads from younger mice and carcinomas from older mice (13.5 ± 1.2 γH2AX foci/cell vs. 5.2 ± 1.5 [P < 0.05] and 3.4 ± 1.1 [P < 0.001], respectively). Serial SPECT imaging revealed a 2.5-fold increase in (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT accumulation in the mammary fat pads of mice aged 76-106 d, compared with control probe (P = 0.01). The median time to detection of neoplastic lesions by (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT (defined as >5% injected dose per gram of tissue) was 96 d, compared with 120 and 131 d for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and palpation, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: DDR imaging using (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT identified mammary tumors significantly earlier than MR imaging. Imaging the DDR holds promise for the detection of preneoplasia and as a technique for screening cancer-prone individuals.
Authors: James C Knight; Caitríona Topping; Michael Mosley; Veerle Kersemans; Nadia Falzone; José M Fernández-Varea; Bart Cornelissen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Martin Pool; H Rudolf de Boer; Marjolijn N Lub-de Hooge; Marcel A T M van Vugt; Elisabeth G E de Vries Journal: Theranostics Date: 2017-05-27 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Anna A Rybczynska; Hendrikus H Boersma; Steven de Jong; Jourik A Gietema; Walter Noordzij; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Philip H Elsinga; Aren van Waarde Journal: Med Res Rev Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 12.944
Authors: James C Knight; Julia Baguña Torres; Robert Goldin; Michael Mosley; Gemma M Dias; Luisa Contreras Bravo; Veerle Kersemans; P Danny Allen; Somnath Mukherjee; Sean Smart; Bart Cornelissen Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-12-20 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Sophie Poty; Komal Mandleywala; Edward O'Neill; James C Knight; Bart Cornelissen; Jason S Lewis Journal: Theranostics Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 11.556
Authors: Edward O'Neill; Veerle Kersemans; P Danny Allen; Samantha Y A Terry; Julia Baguña Torres; Michael Mosley; Sean Smart; Boon Quan Lee; Nadia Falzone; Katherine A Vallis; Mark W Konijnenberg; Marion de Jong; Julie Nonnekens; Bart Cornelissen Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 11.082