Literature DB >> 25453049

Imaging DNA damage allows detection of preneoplasia in the BALB-neuT model of breast cancer.

Bart Cornelissen1, Sarah Able1, Christiana Kartsonaki1, Veerle Kersemans1, P Danny Allen1, Federica Cavallo2, Jean-Baptiste Cazier1, Manuela Iezzi3, James Knight1, Ruth Muschel1, Sean Smart1, Katherine A Vallis4.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A prominent feature of many human cancers is oncogene-driven activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) during early tumorigenesis. It has been shown previously that noninvasive imaging of the phosphorylated histone H2A variant H2AX, γH2AX, a DNA damage signaling protein, is possible using (111)In-labeled anti-γH2AX antibody conjugated to the cell-penetrating peptide transactivator of transcription (TAT). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT detects the DDR during mammary oncogenesis in BALB-neuT mice.
METHODS: Mammary fat pads from BALB-neuT and wild-type mice (age, 40-106 d) were immunostained for γH2AX. (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT or a control probe was administered intravenously to BALB-neuT mice. SPECT was performed weekly and compared with tumor detection using palpation and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
RESULTS: γH2AX expression was elevated in hyperplastic lesions in the mammary fat pads of BALB-neuT mice aged 76-106 d, compared with normal fat pads from younger mice and carcinomas from older mice (13.5 ± 1.2 γH2AX foci/cell vs. 5.2 ± 1.5 [P < 0.05] and 3.4 ± 1.1 [P < 0.001], respectively). Serial SPECT imaging revealed a 2.5-fold increase in (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT accumulation in the mammary fat pads of mice aged 76-106 d, compared with control probe (P = 0.01). The median time to detection of neoplastic lesions by (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT (defined as >5% injected dose per gram of tissue) was 96 d, compared with 120 and 131 d for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and palpation, respectively (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: DDR imaging using (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT identified mammary tumors significantly earlier than MR imaging. Imaging the DDR holds promise for the detection of preneoplasia and as a technique for screening cancer-prone individuals.
© 2014 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BALB-NeuT; breast cancer; early diagnosis; molecular imaging; γH2AX

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25453049     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.114.142083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  8 in total

1.  PET imaging of DNA damage using (89)Zr-labelled anti-γH2AX-TAT immunoconjugates.

Authors:  James C Knight; Caitríona Topping; Michael Mosley; Veerle Kersemans; Nadia Falzone; José M Fernández-Varea; Bart Cornelissen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Harnessing Integrative Omics to Facilitate Molecular Imaging of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Family for Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Martin Pool; H Rudolf de Boer; Marjolijn N Lub-de Hooge; Marcel A T M van Vugt; Elisabeth G E de Vries
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 3.  Imaging the DNA damage response with PET and SPECT.

Authors:  James C Knight; Sofia Koustoulidou; Bart Cornelissen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Avenues to molecular imaging of dying cells: Focus on cancer.

Authors:  Anna A Rybczynska; Hendrikus H Boersma; Steven de Jong; Jourik A Gietema; Walter Noordzij; Rudi A J O Dierckx; Philip H Elsinga; Aren van Waarde
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 12.944

5.  A Model System to Explore the Detection Limits of Antibody-Based Immuno-SPECT Imaging of Exclusively Intranuclear Epitopes.

Authors:  Mathew Veal; Gemma Dias; Veerle Kersemans; Deborah Sneddon; Stephen Faulkner; Bart Cornelissen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 11.082

6.  Early Detection in a Mouse Model of Pancreatic Cancer by Imaging DNA Damage Response Signaling.

Authors:  James C Knight; Julia Baguña Torres; Robert Goldin; Michael Mosley; Gemma M Dias; Luisa Contreras Bravo; Veerle Kersemans; P Danny Allen; Somnath Mukherjee; Sean Smart; Bart Cornelissen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 11.082

7.  89Zr-PET imaging of DNA double-strand breaks for the early monitoring of response following α- and β-particle radioimmunotherapy in a mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Sophie Poty; Komal Mandleywala; Edward O'Neill; James C Knight; Bart Cornelissen; Jason S Lewis
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 11.556

8.  Imaging DNA Damage Repair In Vivo After 177Lu-DOTATATE Therapy.

Authors:  Edward O'Neill; Veerle Kersemans; P Danny Allen; Samantha Y A Terry; Julia Baguña Torres; Michael Mosley; Sean Smart; Boon Quan Lee; Nadia Falzone; Katherine A Vallis; Mark W Konijnenberg; Marion de Jong; Julie Nonnekens; Bart Cornelissen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 11.082

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.