Edward O'Neill1, Veerle Kersemans1, P Danny Allen1, Samantha Y A Terry2, Julia Baguña Torres1, Michael Mosley1, Sean Smart1, Boon Quan Lee1, Nadia Falzone1, Katherine A Vallis1, Mark W Konijnenberg3, Marion de Jong3, Julie Nonnekens3,4,5, Bart Cornelissen6. 1. CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Imaging Chemistry and Biology, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Molecular Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and. 5. Oncode Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 6. CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom bart.cornelissen@oncology.ox.ac.uk.
Abstract
Molecular radiotherapy using 177Lu-DOTATATE is a most effective treatment for somatostatin receptor-expressing neuroendocrine tumors. Despite its frequent and successful use in the clinic, little or no radiobiologic considerations are made at the time of treatment planning or delivery. On positive uptake on octreotide-based PET/SPECT imaging, treatment is usually administered as a standard dose and number of cycles without adjustment for peptide uptake, dosimetry, or radiobiologic and DNA damage effects in the tumor. Here, we visualized and quantified the extent of DNA damage response after 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy using SPECT imaging with 111In-anti-γH2AX-TAT. This work was a proof-of-principle study of this in vivo noninvasive biodosimeter with β-emitting therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Methods: Six cell lines were exposed to external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or 177Lu-DOTATATE, after which the number of γH2AX foci and the clonogenic survival were measured. Mice bearing CA20948 somatostatin receptor-positive tumor xenografts were treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE or sham-treated and coinjected with 111In-anti-γH2AX-TAT, 111In-IgG-TAT control, or vehicle. Results: Clonogenic survival after external-beam radiotherapy was cell-line-specific, indicating varying levels of intrinsic radiosensitivity. Regarding in vitro cell lines treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE, clonogenic survival decreased and γH2AX foci increased for cells expressing high levels of somatostatin receptor subtype 2. Ex vivo measurements revealed a partial correlation between 177Lu-DOTATATE uptake and γH2AX focus induction between different regions of CA20948 xenograft tumors, suggesting that different parts of the tumor may react differentially to 177Lu-DOTATATE irradiation. Conclusion: 111In-anti-γH2AX-TAT allows monitoring of DNA damage after 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy and reveals heterogeneous damage responses.
Molecular radiotherapy using 177Lu-DOTATATE is a most effective treatment for somatostatin receptor-expressing neuroendocrine tumors. Despite its frequent and successful use in the clinic, little or no radiobiologic considerations are made at the time of treatment planning or delivery. On positive uptake on octreotide-based PET/SPECT imaging, treatment is usually administered as a standard dose and number of cycles without adjustment for peptide uptake, dosimetry, or radiobiologic and DNA damage effects in the tumor. Here, we visualized and quantified the extent of DNA damage response after 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy using SPECT imaging with 111In-anti-γH2AX-TAT. This work was a proof-of-principle study of this in vivo noninvasive biodosimeter with β-emitting therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Methods: Six cell lines were exposed to external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or 177Lu-DOTATATE, after which the number of γH2AX foci and the clonogenic survival were measured. Mice bearing CA20948 somatostatin receptor-positive tumor xenografts were treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE or sham-treated and coinjected with 111In-anti-γH2AX-TAT, 111In-IgG-TAT control, or vehicle. Results: Clonogenic survival after external-beam radiotherapy was cell-line-specific, indicating varying levels of intrinsic radiosensitivity. Regarding in vitro cell lines treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE, clonogenic survival decreased and γH2AX foci increased for cells expressing high levels of somatostatin receptor subtype 2. Ex vivo measurements revealed a partial correlation between 177Lu-DOTATATE uptake and γH2AX focus induction between different regions of CA20948 xenograft tumors, suggesting that different parts of the tumor may react differentially to 177Lu-DOTATATE irradiation. Conclusion: 111In-anti-γH2AX-TAT allows monitoring of DNA damage after 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy and reveals heterogeneous damage responses.
Authors: James C Knight; Michael J Mosley; Luisa Contreras Bravo; Veerle Kersemans; P Danny Allen; Somnath Mukherjee; Eric O'Neill; Bart Cornelissen Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Thomas A Hope; Amanda Abbott; Karen Colucci; David L Bushnell; Linda Gardner; William S Graham; Sheila Lindsay; David C Metz; Daniel A Pryma; Michael G Stabin; Jonathan R Strosberg Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Clemens Kratochwil; Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Matthias Eiber; Richard Baum; Murat Fani Bozkurt; Johannes Czernin; Roberto C Delgado Bolton; Samer Ezziddin; Flavio Forrer; Rodney J Hicks; Thomas A Hope; Levant Kabasakal; Mark Konijnenberg; Klaus Kopka; Michael Lassmann; Felix M Mottaghy; Wim Oyen; Kambiz Rahbar; Heiko Schöder; Irene Virgolini; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Lisa Bodei; Stefano Fanti; Uwe Haberkorn; Ken Herrmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Hendrik Bergsma; Mark W Konijnenberg; Wouter A van der Zwan; Boen L R Kam; Jaap J M Teunissen; Peter P Kooij; Katya A L Mauff; Eric P Krenning; Dik J Kwekkeboom Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Alfred Morgenstern; Christos Apostolidis; Clemens Kratochwil; Mike Sathekge; Leszek Krolicki; Frank Bruchertseifer Journal: Curr Radiopharm Date: 2018
Authors: E Fokas; R Prevo; J R Pollard; P M Reaper; P A Charlton; B Cornelissen; K A Vallis; E M Hammond; M M Olcina; W Gillies McKenna; R J Muschel; T B Brunner Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 8.469
Authors: Giulia Tamborino; Julie Nonnekens; Marijke De Saint-Hubert; Lara Struelens; Danny Feijtel; Marion de Jong; Mark W Konijnenberg Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Sara Lundsten; Hanna Berglund; Preeti Jha; Cecilia Krona; Mehran Hariri; Sven Nelander; David P Lane; Marika Nestor Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2021-11-15
Authors: Dirk Zboralski; Aileen Hoehne; Anne Bredenbeck; Anne Schumann; Minh Nguyen; Eberhard Schneider; Jan Ungewiss; Matthias Paschke; Christian Haase; Jan L von Hacht; Tanya Kwan; Kevin K Lin; Jan Lenore; Thomas C Harding; Jim Xiao; Andrew D Simmons; Ajay-Mohan Mohan; Nicola Beindorff; Ulrich Reineke; Christiane Smerling; Frank Osterkamp Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Thorsten Derlin; Natalia Bogdanova; Fiona Ohlendorf; Dhanya Ramachandran; Rudolf A Werner; Tobias L Ross; Hans Christiansen; Frank M Bengel; Christoph Henkenberens Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Pavel Lobachevsky; Helen B Forrester; Alesia Ivashkevich; Joel Mason; Andrew W Stevenson; Chris J Hall; Carl N Sprung; Valentin G Djonov; Olga A Martin Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: An Aerts; Uta Eberlein; Sören Holm; Roland Hustinx; Mark Konijnenberg; Lidia Strigari; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Gerhard Glatting; Michael Lassmann Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 9.236