| Literature DB >> 25452419 |
Theodora Sideri1, Charalampos Rallis1, Danny A Bitton1, Bruno M Lages1, Fang Suo2, María Rodríguez-López1, Li-Lin Du2, Jürg Bähler3.
Abstract
Genetic factors underlying aging are remarkably conserved from yeast to human. The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is an emerging genetic model to analyze cellular aging. Chronological lifespan (CLS) has been studied in stationary-phase yeast cells depleted for glucose, which only survive for a few days. Here, we analyzed CLS in quiescent S. pombe cells deprived of nitrogen, which arrest in a differentiated, G0-like state and survive for more than 2 months. We applied parallel mutant phenotyping by barcode sequencing (Bar-seq) to assay pooled haploid deletion mutants as they aged together during long-term quiescence. As expected, mutants with defects in autophagy or quiescence were under-represented or not detected. Lifespan scores could be calculated for 1199 mutants. We focus the discussion on the 48 most long-lived mutants, including both known aging genes in other model systems and genes not previously implicated in aging. Genes encoding membrane proteins were particularly prominent as pro-aging factors. We independently verified the extended CLS in individual assays for 30 selected mutants, showing the efficacy of the screen. We also applied Bar-seq to profile all pooled deletion mutants for proliferation under a standard growth condition. Unlike for stationary-phase cells, no inverse correlation between growth and CLS of quiescent cells was evident. These screens provide a rich resource for further studies, and they suggest that the quiescence model can provide unique, complementary insights into cellular aging.Entities:
Keywords: G0 phase; cellular aging; competitive growth; longevity; quiescence
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25452419 PMCID: PMC4291465 DOI: 10.1534/g3.114.014415
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.154
Figure 1CLS assays during long-term quiescence under nitrogen deprivation. Two independent biological repeats each for wild-type and for deletion mutant pool were performed. Viability was determined from colony-forming units (CFUs) on plated cells. The CFUs determined at timepoint 0 was defined as 100% survival, and survival at the other timepoints was determined relative to this reference timepoint. For the Bar-seq screen, the mutant-pool experiments shown here were used. The timepoints at which pooled mutants were harvested for Bar-seq analysis are indicated in blue on the X-axis.
Figure 2CLS profiling and lifespan scores of deletion mutants. (A) CLS profiles showing fold-changes for the two barcode tags relative to the reference timepoint (t = 0). The columns show the data for the two biological repeats for the downtags (Down 1 and 2) and uptags (Up 1 and 2) at the five timepoints analyzed (0–14 wk). The rows correspond to the 1199 deletion mutants for which lifespan scores could be determined. The fold changes in tag abundance relative to timepoint 0 are color-coded as indicated at bottom right. The mutants are ordered by lifespan scores, with highest scores at top. The 48 mutants defined as "long-lived" (Table 1) are indicated with a red bracket at top left. The heat map was generated with GeneSpring (Agilent). (B) Plot of ordered lifespan scores for 1199 deletion mutants (see Materials and Methods). The 48 long-lived mutants are indicated in red.
Long-lived mutants
| Mutant | Product Description in PomBase ( | Verified Single Mutants | Long-Lived in Re-growth Screen | GO Cellular Component ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPBC1198.07c | Mannan endo-1,6-alpha-mannosidase (predicted) | Yes | Yes | Integral component of membrane, endoplasmic reticulum |
| SPBC14C8.15 | Triglyceride lipase-cholesterol esterase (predicted) | Not tested | Yes | Integral component of membrane, Golgi apparatus |
| SPBC18H10.18c | Sequence orphan | Yes | Yes | Integral component of membrane |
| SPCC594.02c | Conserved fungal protein | Yes | Yes | Integral component of membrane, endoplasmic reticulum |
| SPBC30D10.09c | HVA22/TB2/DP1 family protein | Not tested | Yes | Integral component of membrane, endoplasmic reticulum |
| GTPase activating protein Gyp3 (predicted) | Yes | Yes | Integral component of membrane | |
| Acyltransferase (predicted) | Yes | Yes | Integral component of membrane, Golgi apparatus, endoplasmic reticulum | |
| Ferric chelate reductase (predicted) | Yes | Yes | Plasma membrane, endoplasmic reticulum | |
| Neuronal calcium sensor-related protein Ncs1 | Yes | Yes | Plasma membrane | |
| Rho family GTPase Rho2 | Yes | Yes | Plasma membrane | |
| SPCC1020.08 | Wybutosine biosynthesis protein Tyw1 (predicted) | Not tested | Yes | Endoplasmic reticulum |
| SPAC23D3.03c | GTPase-activating protein (predicted) | Yes | Yes | Golgi apparatus |
| Cell surface glycoprotein | Not tested | No | Golgi apparatus, endoplasmic reticulum | |
| Vps20-associated protein Vts1 (predicted) | Yes | Yes | ||
| SPAC8E11.05c | Conserved fungal protein | Yes | Yes | |
| SPACUNK4.16c | Trehalose-phosphate synthase (predicted) | Yes | Yes | |
| SPBC1921.04c | Dubious | Yes | Yes | |
| SPCC320.03 | Transcription factor (predicted) | Yes | Yes | |
| SPCC594.01 | DUF1769 family protein | Yes | Yes | |
| ARS binding protein Abp2 | Not tested | Yes | ||
| AP-2 adaptor complex subunit Apl1 (predicted) | Yes | Yes | ||
| AP-2 adaptor complex subunit Aps2 (predicted) | Yes | Yes | ||
| Histone H3 lysine methyltransferase Clr4 | Not tested | No | ||
| Cytosine-mismatch binding protein 1 | Not tested | No | ||
| MAPK-activated protein kinase Cmk2 | Not tested | Yes | ||
| AP-2 adaptor complex subunit Alp3 (predicted) | Yes | Yes | ||
| SPBC947.09 | ThiJ domain protein | Not tested | No | |
| Inducer of sexual development Sds23/Moc1 | Yes | Yes | ||
| SPCC306.11 | Sequence orphan | Not tested | No | |
| Glutathione peroxidase Gpx1 | Not tested | No | ||
| Histone H3 h3.1 | Yes | Yes | ||
| Mago Nashi interacting protein Mni1 (predicted) | No | Yes | ||
| Mediator of replication checkpoint 1 | Yes | Yes | ||
| MutS protein homolog 3 | Yes | Yes | ||
| CwfJ family protein, splicing factor (predicted) | Not tested | Yes | ||
| Short chain dehydrogenase (predicted) | Not tested | No | ||
| SPBC4B4.12c | Sequence orphan | Not tested | No | |
| MAP kinase kinase Pek1 | Not tested | Yes | ||
| Phospholipase B homolog Plb1 | Yes | Yes | ||
| DASH complex subunit | Not tested | No | ||
| Cyclin Clg1 (predicted) | Not tested | Yes | ||
| Histone lysine methyltransferase Set9 | Yes | Yes | ||
| Serine/threonine protein kinase Spo4 | Yes | Yes | ||
| Transcription elongation factor TFIIS | Yes | Yes | ||
| Translation initiation factor eIF2 gamma subunit (predicted) | Yes | Yes | ||
| Serine/threonine protein kinase | Yes | Yes | ||
| SPCC794.03 | Amino acid permease (predicted) | Yes | Yes | |
| SPBC8E4.02c | Sequence orphan | Yes | Yes |
Figure 3Independent verification of CLS for selected mutants in individual cultures. Mutant and wild-type (wt) control cells were assayed at 0, 9, 24, and 32 wk after entering quiescence in the absence of nitrogen. As indicated on top, 10-fold serial dilutions from each timepoint were spotted on agar plates for each culture. The mutant strains are color-coded as follows: red, long-lived mutants (Table 1); orange, mutants with high lifespan scores ∼0.4-1.2; green, lifespan score <0.14; blue, two mutants known to be long-lived during quiescence but for which no lifespan score could be computed.
Figure 4Growth profiling of deletion mutants and comparison to CLS. (A) Growth curves for two independent biological repeats of deletion mutant pool. The mutant pools were grown in EMM medium to exponential phase and diluted to OD600 0.14 (timepoint 0). The OD600 was measured at 120, 230, 340, 460, and 550 min, and the pooled mutants were harvested at the same timepoints for Bar-seq analysis (green squares). (B) Plot of ordered growth scores for 2314 deletion mutants (see Materials and Methods). (C) Plot of growth scores vs. corresponding lifespan scores of 1193 mutants for which both scores could be determined. Growth and lifespan scores show no significant correlation (rPearson = −0.009; P = ∼0.75).