Literature DB >> 25450850

Cartilage thickness at the posterior medial femoral condyle is increased in femorotibial knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional CT arthrography study (Part 2).

P Omoumi1, N Michoux2, F W Roemer3, E Thienpont4, B C Vande Berg2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the thickness of cartilage at the posterior aspect of the medial and lateral condyle in Osteoarthritis (OA) knees compared to non-OA knees using computed tomography arthrography (CTA).
DESIGN: 535 consecutive knee CTAs (mean patient age = 48.7 ± 16.0; 286 males), were retrospectively analyzed. Knees were radiographically classified into OA or non-OA knees according to a modified Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grading scheme. Cartilage thickness at the posterior aspect of the medial and lateral femoral condyles was measured on sagittal reformations, and compared between matched OA and non-OA knees in the whole sample population and in subgroups defined by gender and age.
RESULTS: The cartilage of the posterior aspect of medial condyle was statistically significantly thicker in OA knees (2.43 mm (95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.36, 2.51)) compared to non-OA knees (2.13 mm (95%CI = 2.02, 2.17)) in the entire sample population (P < 0.001), as well as for all subgroups of patients over 40 years old (all P ≤ 0.01), except for females above 60 years old (P = 0.07). Increase in cartilage thickness at the posterior aspect of the medial condyle was associated with increasing K/L grade in the entire sample population, as well as for males and females separately (regression coefficient = 0.10-0.12, all P < 0.001). For the lateral condyle, there was no statistically significant association between cartilage thickness and OA (either presence of OA or K/L grade).
CONCLUSIONS: Cartilage thickness at the non-weight-bearing posterior aspect of the medial condyle, but not of the lateral condyle, was increased in OA knees compared to non-OA knees. Furthermore, cartilage thickness at the posterior aspect of the medial condyle increased with increasing K/L grade.
Copyright © 2014 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthrography; Cartilage; Computed tomography; Osteoarthritis; Thickness

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25450850     DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  10 in total

1.  Variation in the Thickness of Knee Cartilage. The Use of a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm for Cartilage Segmentation of Magnetic Resonance Images.

Authors:  Romil F Shah; Alejandro M Martinez; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas P Vail; Stefano A Bini
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Cartilage can be thicker in advanced osteoarthritic knees: a tridimensional quantitative analysis of cartilage thickness at posterior aspect of femoral condyles.

Authors:  Patrick Omoumi; Hugo Babel; Brigitte M Jolles; Julien Favre
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Severe radiographic knee osteoarthritis--does Kellgren and Lawrence grade 4 represent end stage disease?--the MOST study.

Authors:  A Guermazi; D Hayashi; F Roemer; D T Felson; K Wang; J Lynch; S Amin; J Torner; C E Lewis; M C Nevitt
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Changes in femoral posterior condylar offset and knee flexion after PCL-substituting total knee arthroplasty: comparison of anterior and posterior referencing systems.

Authors:  Hyuksoo Han; Sohee Oh; Chong Bum Chang; Seung-Baik Kang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Isotropic morphometry and multicomponent T1 ρ mapping of human knee articular cartilage in vivo at 3T.

Authors:  Rahman Baboli; Azadeh Sharafi; Gregory Chang; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Effects of Articular Cartilage Constituents on Phosphotungstic Acid Enhanced Micro-Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Sakari S Karhula; Mikko A Finnilä; Mikko J Lammi; Janne H Ylärinne; Sami Kauppinen; Lassi Rieppo; Kenneth P H Pritzker; Heikki J Nieminen; Simo Saarakkala
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of Different Approaches for Measuring Tibial Cartilage Thickness.

Authors:  Jennifer Maier; Marianne Black; Serena Bonaretti; Bastian Bier; Bjoern Eskofier; Jang-Hwan Choi; Marc Levenston; Garry Gold; Rebecca Fahrig; Andreas Maier
Journal:  J Integr Bioinform       Date:  2017-07-28

8.  Quantifying Complex Micro-Topography of Degenerated Articular Cartilage Surface by Contrast-Enhanced Micro-Computed Tomography and Parametric Analyses.

Authors:  Tuomo Ylitalo; Mikko A J Finnilä; Harpal K Gahunia; Sakari S Karhula; Heikki Suhonen; Maarit Valkealahti; Petri Lehenkari; Edward Haeggström; Kenneth P H Pritzker; Simo Saarakkala; Heikki J Nieminen
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Knee Cartilage Thickness Differs Alongside Ages: A 3-T Magnetic Resonance Research Upon 2,481 Subjects via Deep Learning.

Authors:  Liping Si; Kai Xuan; Jingyu Zhong; Jiayu Huo; Yue Xing; Jia Geng; Yangfan Hu; Huan Zhang; Qian Wang; Weiwu Yao
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-09

10.  Trans-Posterior Cruciate Ligament All-Inside Root Repair Versus Partial Meniscectomy for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: Comparison of Semiquantitative and Quantitative MRI Outcomes in Cartilage Degeneration and Osteoarthritic Progression.

Authors:  Jiarong Su; Hongyan Wan; Yingchang Pang; Yanli Lu; Jiaming Liang; Zhigang Yan; Sibo Xu; Tiezheng Sun
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.117

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.