Srikanth Ryali1, Tianwen Chen2, Aarthi Padmanabhan2, Weidong Cai2, Vinod Menon3. 1. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, United States. Electronic address: sryali@stanford.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, United States. 3. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, United States; Program in Neuroscience, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, United States; Department of Neurology & Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clustering methods are increasingly employed to segment brain regions into functional subdivisions using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). However, these methods are highly sensitive to the (i) precise algorithms employed, (ii) their initializations, and (iii) metrics used for uncovering the optimal number of clusters from the data. NEW METHOD: To address these issues, we develop a novel consensus clustering evidence accumulation (CC-EAC) framework, which effectively combines multiple clustering methods for segmenting brain regions using rs-fMRI data. Using extensive computer simulations, we examine the performance of widely used clustering algorithms including K-means, hierarchical, and spectral clustering as well as their combinations. We also examine the accuracy and validity of five objective criteria for determining the optimal number of clusters: mutual information, variation of information, modified silhouette, Rand index, and probabilistic Rand index. RESULTS: A CC-EAC framework with a combination of base K-means clustering (KC) and hierarchical clustering (HC) with probabilistic Rand index as the criterion for choosing the optimal number of clusters, accurately uncovered the correct number of clusters from simulated datasets. In experimental rs-fMRI data, these methods reliably detected functional subdivisions of the supplementary motor area, insula, intraparietal sulcus, angular gyrus, and striatum. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Unlike conventional approaches, CC-EAC can accurately determine the optimal number of stable clusters in rs-fMRI data, and is robust to initialization and choice of free parameters. CONCLUSIONS: A novel CC-EAC framework is proposed for segmenting brain regions, by effectively combining multiple clustering methods and identifying optimal stable functional clusters in rs-fMRI data.
BACKGROUND: Clustering methods are increasingly employed to segment brain regions into functional subdivisions using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). However, these methods are highly sensitive to the (i) precise algorithms employed, (ii) their initializations, and (iii) metrics used for uncovering the optimal number of clusters from the data. NEW METHOD: To address these issues, we develop a novel consensus clustering evidence accumulation (CC-EAC) framework, which effectively combines multiple clustering methods for segmenting brain regions using rs-fMRI data. Using extensive computer simulations, we examine the performance of widely used clustering algorithms including K-means, hierarchical, and spectral clustering as well as their combinations. We also examine the accuracy and validity of five objective criteria for determining the optimal number of clusters: mutual information, variation of information, modified silhouette, Rand index, and probabilistic Rand index. RESULTS: A CC-EAC framework with a combination of base K-means clustering (KC) and hierarchical clustering (HC) with probabilistic Rand index as the criterion for choosing the optimal number of clusters, accurately uncovered the correct number of clusters from simulated datasets. In experimental rs-fMRI data, these methods reliably detected functional subdivisions of the supplementary motor area, insula, intraparietal sulcus, angular gyrus, and striatum. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Unlike conventional approaches, CC-EAC can accurately determine the optimal number of stable clusters in rs-fMRI data, and is robust to initialization and choice of free parameters. CONCLUSIONS: A novel CC-EAC framework is proposed for segmenting brain regions, by effectively combining multiple clustering methods and identifying optimal stable functional clusters in rs-fMRI data.
Authors: Tinca J C Polderman; M Florencia Gosso; Danielle Posthuma; Toos C E M Van Beijsterveldt; Peter Heutink; Frank C Verhulst; Dorret I Boomsma Journal: Acta Neurol Belg Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 2.396
Authors: Tobias Egner; Jim M P Monti; Emily H Trittschuh; Christina A Wieneke; Joy Hirsch; M-Marsel Mesulam Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2008-06-11 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Alexander L Cohen; Damien A Fair; Nico U F Dosenbach; Francis M Miezin; Donna Dierker; David C Van Essen; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-03-25 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Gagan S Wig; Timothy O Laumann; Alexander L Cohen; Jonathan D Power; Steven M Nelson; Matthew F Glasser; Francis M Miezin; Abraham Z Snyder; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Kelly Anne Barnes; Alexander L Cohen; Jonathan D Power; Steven M Nelson; Yannic B L Dosenbach; Francis M Miezin; Steven E Petersen; Bradley L Schlaggar Journal: Front Syst Neurosci Date: 2010-06-10
Authors: Raymond Salvador; John Suckling; Martin R Coleman; John D Pickard; David Menon; Ed Bullmore Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2005-01-05 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Mojtaba Zarei; Christian F Beckmann; Maja A A Binnewijzend; Menno M Schoonheim; Mohammad Ali Oghabian; Ernesto J Sanz-Arigita; Philip Scheltens; Paul M Matthews; Frederik Barkhof Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-11-03 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Sarah Genon; Hai Li; Lingzhong Fan; Veronika I Müller; Edna C Cieslik; Felix Hoffstaedter; Andrew T Reid; Robert Langner; Christian Grefkes; Peter T Fox; Susanne Moebus; Svenja Caspers; Katrin Amunts; Tianzi Jiang; Simon B Eickhoff Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Pantea Moghimi; Anh The Dang; Quan Do; Theoden I Netoff; Kelvin O Lim; Gowtham Atluri Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 2.974
Authors: Rui Yuan; Jordan M Nechvatal; Christine L Buckmaster; Sarah Ayash; Karen J Parker; Alan F Schatzberg; David M Lyons; Vinod Menon Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2021-01-25 Impact factor: 8.294