Literature DB >> 25448457

Nomogram for predicting incomplete cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer patients.

Seung-Hyuk Shim1, Sun Joo Lee1, Seon-Ok Kim2, Soo-Nyung Kim1, Dae-Yeon Kim3, Jong Jin Lee4, Jong-Hyeok Kim5, Yong-Man Kim5, Young-Tak Kim5, Joo-Hyun Nam5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Accurately predicting cytoreducibility in advanced-ovarian cancer is needed to establish preoperative plans, consider neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and improve clinical trial protocols. We aimed to develop a positron-emission tomography/computed tomography-based nomogram for predicting incomplete cytoreduction in advanced-ovarian cancer patients.
METHODS: Between 2006 and 2012, 343 consecutive advanced-ovarian cancer patients underwent positron-emission tomography/computed tomography before primary cytoreduction: 240 and 103 patients were assigned to the model development or validation cohort, respectively. After reviewing the detailed surgical documentation, incomplete cytoreduction was defined as a remaining gross residual tumor. We evaluated each individual surgeon's surgical aggressiveness index (number of high-complex surgeries/total number of surgeries). Possible predictors, including surgical aggressiveness index and positron-emission tomography/computed tomography features, were analyzed using logistic regression modeling. A nomogram based on this model was developed and externally validated.
RESULTS: Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 120 patients (35%). Surgical aggressiveness index and five positron-emission tomography/computed tomography features were independent predictors of incomplete cytoreduction. Our nomogram predicted incomplete cytoreduction by incorporating these variables and demonstrated good predictive accuracy (concordance index = 0.881; 95% CI = 0.838-0.923). The predictive accuracy of our validation cohort was also good (concordance index = 0.881; 95% CI = 0.790-0.932) and the predicted probability was close to the actual observed outcome. Our model demonstrated good performance across surgeons with varying degrees of surgical aggressiveness.
CONCLUSION: We have developed and validated a nomogram for predicting incomplete cytoreduction in advanced-ovarian cancer patients which may help stratify patients for clinical trials, establish meticulous preoperative plans, and determine if neoadjuvant chemotherapy is warranted.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nomogram; Ovarian cancer; Positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT); Residual cancer; Surgical specialty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25448457     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  16 in total

1.  Correlation of Pattern of Spread and Outcomes in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancers.

Authors:  Amrutha Ramachandran; Anupama Rajanbabu; Kiran Gulabrao Bagul; Keechilat Pavithran; Dehannathparambil K Vijaykumar
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-02

Review 2.  Prediction of optimal debulking surgery in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Yong Jung Song
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-03

3.  18F-FDG-PET/CT based total metabolic tumor volume change during neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts outcome in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Tuulia Vallius; Johanna Hynninen; Jukka Kemppainen; Victor Alves; Kari Auranen; Jaakko Matomäki; Sinikka Oksa; Johanna Virtanen; Seija Grénman; Annika Auranen; Marko Seppänen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Prognostic value of complete metabolic response on ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT after three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Young Shin Chung; Yup Kim; Hyun-Soo Kim; Jung-Yun Lee; Won Jun Kang; Sunghoon Kim; Sang Wun Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.756

Review 5.  Systematic Review on the Accuracy of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Ovarian Cancer: Is Functional Information Really Needed?

Authors:  Subapriya Suppiah; Wing Liong Chang; Hasyma Abu Hassan; Chalermrat Kaewput; Andi Anggeriana Andi Asri; Fathinul Fikri Ahmad Saad; Abdul Jalil Nordin; Sobhan Vinjamuri
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep

6.  Prediction model for 30-day morbidity after gynecological malignancy surgery.

Authors:  Seung-Hyuk Shim; Sun Joo Lee; Meari Dong; Jung Hwa Suh; Seo Yeon Kim; Ji Hye Lee; Soo-Nyung Kim; Soon-Beom Kang; Jayoun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Preoperative PET/CT score can predict complete resection in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Bingxin Gu; Lingfang Xia; Huijuan Ge; Shuai Liu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-03

Review 8.  ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE Consensus Statement on pre-operative diagnosis of ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Dirk Timmerman; François Planchamp; Tom Bourne; Chiara Landolfo; Andreas du Bois; Luis Chiva; David Cibula; Nicole Concin; Daniela Fischerova; Wouter Froyman; Guillermo Gallardo Madueño; Birthe Lemley; Annika Loft; Liliana Mereu; Philippe Morice; Denis Querleu; Antonia Carla Testa; Ignace Vergote; Vincent Vandecaveye; Giovanni Scambia; Christina Fotopoulou
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.437

9.  Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing tumour resectability in advanced epithelial ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer.

Authors:  Joline F Roze; Jacob P Hoogendam; Fleur T van de Wetering; René Spijker; Leen Verleye; Joan Vlayen; Wouter B Veldhuis; Rob Jpm Scholten; Ronald P Zweemer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-08

10.  Gene expression profiling of ovarian carcinomas and prognostic analysis of outcome.

Authors:  Sheng-Yun Cai; Tian Yang; Yu Chen; Jing-Wen Wang; Li Li; Ming-Juan Xu
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 4.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.