Satoko Amemori1, Ken-Ichi Amemori1, Margaret L Cantor1, Ann M Graybiel2. 1. McGovern Institute for Brain Research and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States. 2. McGovern Institute for Brain Research and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States. Electronic address: graybiel@mit.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We have developed a novel head-holding device for behaving non-human primates that affords stability suitable for reliable chronic electrophysiological recording experiments. The device is completely non-invasive, and thus avoids the risk of infection and other complications that can occur with the use of conventional, surgically implanted head-fixation devices. NEW METHOD: The device consists of a novel non-invasive head mold and bar clamp holder, and is customized to the shape of each monkey's head. The head-holding device that we introduce, combined with our recording system and reflection-based eye-tracking system, allows for chronic behavioral experiments and single-electrode or multi-electrode recording, as well as manipulation of brain activity. RESULTS AND COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: With electrodes implanted chronically in multiple brain regions, we could record neural activity from cortical and subcortical structures with stability equal to that recorded with conventional head-post fixation. Consistent with the non-invasive nature of the device, we could record neural signals for more than two years with a single implant. Importantly, the monkeys were able to hold stable eye fixation positions while held by this device, demonstrating the possibility of analyzing eye movement data with only the gentle restraint imposed by the non-invasive head-holding device. CONCLUSIONS: We show that the head-holding device introduced here can be extended to the head holding of smaller animals, and note that it could readily be adapted for magnetic resonance brain imaging over extended periods of time.
BACKGROUND: We have developed a novel head-holding device for behaving non-human primates that affords stability suitable for reliable chronic electrophysiological recording experiments. The device is completely non-invasive, and thus avoids the risk of infection and other complications that can occur with the use of conventional, surgically implanted head-fixation devices. NEW METHOD: The device consists of a novel non-invasive head mold and bar clamp holder, and is customized to the shape of each monkey's head. The head-holding device that we introduce, combined with our recording system and reflection-based eye-tracking system, allows for chronic behavioral experiments and single-electrode or multi-electrode recording, as well as manipulation of brain activity. RESULTS AND COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: With electrodes implanted chronically in multiple brain regions, we could record neural activity from cortical and subcortical structures with stability equal to that recorded with conventional head-post fixation. Consistent with the non-invasive nature of the device, we could record neural signals for more than two years with a single implant. Importantly, the monkeys were able to hold stable eye fixation positions while held by this device, demonstrating the possibility of analyzing eye movement data with only the gentle restraint imposed by the non-invasive head-holding device. CONCLUSIONS: We show that the head-holding device introduced here can be extended to the head holding of smaller animals, and note that it could readily be adapted for magnetic resonance brain imaging over extended periods of time.
Authors: Joseph Feingold; Theresa M Desrochers; Naotaka Fujii; Ray Harlan; Patrick L Tierney; Hideki Shimazu; Ken-Ichi Amemori; Ann M Graybiel Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Andrew R Mitz; Ravi V Chacko; Philip T Putnam; Peter H Rudebeck; Elisabeth A Murray Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Helen N Schwerdt; Hideki Shimazu; Ken-Ichi Amemori; Satoko Amemori; Patrick L Tierney; Daniel J Gibson; Simon Hong; Tomoko Yoshida; Robert Langer; Michael J Cima; Ann M Graybiel Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jacqueline A Overton; Dylan F Cooke; Adam B Goldring; Steven A Lucero; Conor Weatherford; Gregg H Recanzone Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2017-08-30 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Caroline B Drucker; Monica L Carlson; Koji Toda; Nicholas K DeWind; Michael L Platt Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Amy M Ryan; Sara M Freeman; Takeshi Murai; Allison R Lau; Michelle C Palumbo; Casey E Hogrefe; Karen L Bales; Melissa D Bauman Journal: Front Behav Neurosci Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 3.558
Authors: Heather Slater; Alice E Milne; Benjamin Wilson; Ross S Muers; Fabien Balezeau; David Hunter; Alexander Thiele; Timothy D Griffiths; Christopher I Petkov Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2016-05-14 Impact factor: 2.390