Andrew R Mitz1, Ravi V Chacko2, Philip T Putnam3, Peter H Rudebeck4, Elisabeth A Murray3. 1. Section on the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: arm@nih.gov. 2. Section on the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, USA. 3. Section on the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. 4. Section on the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are a valuable research model because of their behavioral, physiological and neuroanatomical similarities to humans. In the absence of language, autonomic activity can provide crucial information about cognitive and affective states during single-unit recording, inactivation and lesion studies. Methods standardized for use in humans are not easily adapted to NHPs and detailed guidance has been lacking. NEW METHOD: We provide guidance for monitoring heart rate and pupil size in the behavioral neurophysiology setting by addressing the methodological issues, pitfalls and solutions for NHP studies. The methods are based on comparative physiology to establish a rationale for each solution. We include examples from both electrophysiological and lesion studies. RESULTS: Single-unit recording, pupil responses and heart rate changes represent a range of decreasing temporal resolution, a characteristic that impacts experimental design and analysis. We demonstrate the unexpected result that autonomic measures acquired before and after amygdala lesions are comparable despite disruption of normal autonomic function. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Species and study design differences can render standard techniques used in human studies inappropriate for NHP studies. We show how to manage data from small groups typical of NHP studies, data from the short behavioral trials typical of neurophysiological studies, issues associated with longitudinal studies, and differences in anatomy and physiology. CONCLUSIONS: Autonomic measurement to infer cognitive and affective states in NHP is neither off-the-shelf nor onerous. Familiarity with the issues and solutions will broaden the use of autonomic signals in NHP single unit and lesion studies. Published by Elsevier B.V.
BACKGROUND: Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are a valuable research model because of their behavioral, physiological and neuroanatomical similarities to humans. In the absence of language, autonomic activity can provide crucial information about cognitive and affective states during single-unit recording, inactivation and lesion studies. Methods standardized for use in humans are not easily adapted to NHPs and detailed guidance has been lacking. NEW METHOD: We provide guidance for monitoring heart rate and pupil size in the behavioral neurophysiology setting by addressing the methodological issues, pitfalls and solutions for NHP studies. The methods are based on comparative physiology to establish a rationale for each solution. We include examples from both electrophysiological and lesion studies. RESULTS: Single-unit recording, pupil responses and heart rate changes represent a range of decreasing temporal resolution, a characteristic that impacts experimental design and analysis. We demonstrate the unexpected result that autonomic measures acquired before and after amygdala lesions are comparable despite disruption of normal autonomic function. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Species and study design differences can render standard techniques used in human studies inappropriate for NHP studies. We show how to manage data from small groups typical of NHP studies, data from the short behavioral trials typical of neurophysiological studies, issues associated with longitudinal studies, and differences in anatomy and physiology. CONCLUSIONS: Autonomic measurement to infer cognitive and affective states in NHP is neither off-the-shelf nor onerous. Familiarity with the issues and solutions will broaden the use of autonomic signals in NHP single unit and lesion studies. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors: Adriana L Bertrand; João Batista S Garcia; Erica B Viera; Alcione M Santos; Romero H Bertrand Journal: Pain Physician Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Matthew R Nassar; Katherine M Rumsey; Robert C Wilson; Kinjan Parikh; Benjamin Heasly; Joshua I Gold Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2012-06-03 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: David Pagliaccio; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft; Olga Dal Monte; Bruno B Averbeck; Vincent D Costa Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Avinash R Vaidya; Maia S Pujara; Michael Petrides; Elisabeth A Murray; Lesley K Fellows Journal: Trends Cogn Sci Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 20.229
Authors: Catherine Elorette; Atsushi Fujimoto; J Megan Fredericks; Frederic M Stoll; Brian E Russ; Peter H Rudebeck Journal: Behav Neurosci Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 1.912
Authors: Benjamin M Basile; Jessica A Joiner; Olga Dal Monte; Nicholas A Fagan; Chloe L Karaskiewicz; Daniel R Lucas; Steve W C Chang; Elisabeth A Murray Journal: Behav Neurosci Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 2.154
Authors: Sahib S Khalsa; Ralph Adolphs; Oliver G Cameron; Hugo D Critchley; Paul W Davenport; Justin S Feinstein; Jamie D Feusner; Sarah N Garfinkel; Richard D Lane; Wolf E Mehling; Alicia E Meuret; Charles B Nemeroff; Stephen Oppenheimer; Frederike H Petzschner; Olga Pollatos; Jamie L Rhudy; Lawrence P Schramm; W Kyle Simmons; Murray B Stein; Klaas E Stephan; Omer Van den Bergh; Ilse Van Diest; Andreas von Leupoldt; Martin P Paulus Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2017-12-28
Authors: Benjamin M Basile; Jamie L Schafroth; Chloe L Karaskiewicz; Steve W C Chang; Elisabeth A Murray Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 8.029