Literature DB >> 25445899

Emphysema quantification on low-dose CT using percentage of low-attenuation volume and size distribution of low-attenuation lung regions: effects of adaptive iterative dose reduction using 3D processing.

Mizuho Nishio1, Sumiaki Matsumoto2, Shinichiro Seki3, Hisanobu Koyama4, Yoshiharu Ohno5, Yasuko Fujisawa6, Naoki Sugihara7, Takeshi Yoshikawa8, Kazuro Sugimura9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of adaptive iterative dose reduction using 3D processing (AIDR 3D) for quantification of two measures of emphysema: percentage of low-attenuation volume (LAV%) and size distribution of low-attenuation lung regions. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Fifty-two patients who underwent standard-dose (SDCT) and low-dose CT (LDCT)were included. SDCT without AIDR 3D, LDCT without AIDR 3D, and LDCT with AIDR 3D were used for emphysema quantification. First, LAV% was computed at 10 thresholds from −990 to −900 HU. Next, at the same thresholds, linear regression on a log–log plot was used to compute the power law exponent (D)for the cumulative frequency-size distribution of low-attenuation lung regions. Bland–Altman analysis was used to assess whether AIDR 3D improved agreement between LDCT and SDCT for emphysema quantification of LAV% and D.
RESULTS: The mean relative differences in LAV% between LDCT without AIDR 3D and SDCT were 3.73%–88.18% and between LDCT with AIDR 3D and SDCT were −6.61% to 0.406%. The mean relative differences in D between LDCT without AIDR 3D and SDCT were 8.22%–19.11% and between LDCT with AIDR3D and SDCT were 1.82%–4.79%. AIDR 3D improved agreement between LDCT and SDCT at thresholds from −930 to −990 HU for LAV% and at all thresholds for D.
CONCLUSION: AIDR 3D improved the consistency between LDCT and SDCT for emphysema quantification of LAV% and D.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25445899     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  9 in total

1.  Impact of iterative reconstructions on objective and subjective emphysema assessment with computed tomography: a prospective study.

Authors:  Steve P Martin; Joanna Gariani; Anne-Lise Hachulla; Diomidis Botsikas; Dan Adler; Wolfram Karenovics; Christoph D Becker; Xavier Montet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Clinical CT underestimation of the percentage volume occupied by cysts in patients with lymphangioleiomyomatosis.

Authors:  Thomas C Larsen; Amir M Hasani; Shirley F Rollison; Tania R Machado; Amanda M Jones; Patricia Julien-Williams; Marcus Y Chen; Joel Moss; Han Wen
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 1.605

3.  A phantom study comparing low-dose CT physical image quality from five different CT scanners.

Authors:  Yali Li; Yaojun Jiang; Huilong Liu; Xi Yu; Sihui Chen; Duoshan Ma; Jianbo Gao; Yan Wu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-01

4.  Quantitative measurements of emphysema in ultra-high resolution computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction in comparison to that using hybrid iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Shun Muramatsu; Kazuhiro Sato; Tsuneo Yamashiro; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2022-01-13

5.  Ultra-Small Lung Cysts Impair Diffusion Without Obstructing Air Flow in Lymphangioleiomyomatosis.

Authors:  Brianna P Matthew; Amir M Hasani; Yun-Ching Chen; Mehdi Pirooznia; Mario Stylianou; Shirley F Rollison; Tania R Machado; Nora M Quade; Amanda M Jones; Patricia Julien-Williams; Angelo Taveira-DaSilva; Marcus Y Chen; Joel Moss; Han Wen
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Emphysema quantification using chest CT: influence of radiation dose reduction and reconstruction technique.

Authors:  Annemarie M den Harder; Erwin de Boer; Suzanne J Lagerweij; Martijn F Boomsma; Arnold M R Schilham; Martin J Willemink; Julien Milles; Tim Leiner; Ricardo P J Budde; Pim A de Jong
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2018-11-07

7.  Emphysema quantification using hybrid versus model-based generations of iterative reconstruction: SAFIRE versus ADMIRE.

Authors:  Steve P Martin; Joanna Gariani; Grégoire Feutry; Dan Adler; Wolfram Karenovics; Christoph D Becker; Xavier Montet
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Impact of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction on the Correlation between Computed Tomography Quantification of a Low Lung Attenuation Area and Airway Measurements and Pulmonary Function Test Results in Normal Subjects.

Authors:  Da Jung Kim; Cherry Kim; Chol Shin; Seung Ku Lee; Chang Sub Ko; Ki Yeol Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Estimation of lung cancer risk using homology-based emphysema quantification in patients with lung nodules.

Authors:  Mizuho Nishio; Takeshi Kubo; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.