Literature DB >> 25445726

Very urgent carotid endarterectomy does not increase the procedural risk.

B Rantner1, C Schmidauer2, M Knoflach2, G Fraedrich3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The timing of CEA for symptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis remains a matter of controversy. Recent registry data showed a significantly increased risk, especially in the very early days after the onset of symptoms. In this study the outcome of CEA in the hyperacute phase has been investigated.
METHODS: The outcome of CEA for symptomatic ICA stenosis between January 2004 and December 2013 has been retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into four timing groups: surgery within 0 and 2 days, between 3 and 7 days, 8 and 14 days, and thereafter. The post-operative 30 day stroke and death rates were assessed.
RESULTS: A total of 761 symptomatic patients (40.1% with transient ischemic attack [TIA], 21.3% with amaurosis fugax, and 38.6% with ischemic stroke) were included, with an overall peri-operative stroke and death rate of 3.3%. A stroke and death rate of 4.4% (9/206) for surgery within 0 and 2 days, 1.8% (4/219) between 3 and 7 days, 4.4% (6/136) between 8 and 14 days, and 2.5% (5/200) in the period thereafter (p = .25 for the difference between the groups) was observed. The timing of surgery did not influence the peri-operative outcome in a multivariate regression analysis (OR 0.93 [0.63-1.36], p = .71).
CONCLUSIONS: These data show that very urgent surgery in symptomatic patients can be performed without increased procedural risk. Given the fact that ruptured plaques with neurological symptoms carry the highest risk of a recurrent ischemic event in the first 2 days, treating patients as soon as possible to offer the highest benefit in stroke prevention is recommended.
Copyright © 2014 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid endarterectomy; Hyperacute period; Internal carotid artery; Symptomatic stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25445726     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  7 in total

Review 1.  Management of transient ischemic attack or nondisabling stroke related to extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Varun Kapila; Prasad Jetty; Vincenzo S Basile; Luc Dubois
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Carotid Endarterectomy: Current Concepts and Practice Patterns.

Authors:  Sibu P Saha; Subhajit Saha; Krishna S Vyas
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-08-14

3.  Effects of timing on in-hospital and one-year outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization.

Authors:  Christina L Cui; Hanaa Dakour-Aridi; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Marc L Schermerhorn; Jeffrey J Siracuse; Mahmoud B Malas
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Safety and Efficacy of Early Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiao Chen; Jing Su; Guojun Wang; Han Zhao; Shizhong Zhang; Tao Liu; Xindi Su; Ning Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: Surgery, Stenting, or Medical Therapy?

Authors:  Ashley M Wabnitz; Tanya N Turan
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-08

Review 6.  Management and prognosis of acute extracranial internal carotid artery occlusion.

Authors:  Lukas Mayer; Astrid Grams; Christian F Freyschlag; Maria Gummerer; Michael Knoflach
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10

Review 7.  Timing of carotid endarterectomy and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Bilal Azhar; Arsalan Wafi; James Budge; Ian Loftus
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.