Literature DB >> 25444985

MUSIC: patterns of care in the radiographic staging of men with newly diagnosed low risk prostate cancer.

Ishai Ross1, Paul Womble2, Jun Ye2, Susan Linsell2, James E Montie2, David C Miller2, Michael L Cher3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: MUSIC is a statewide consortium of 42 urology practices that aims to improve the quality of prostate cancer care in Michigan. As an initial priority, we examined patterns of care in the radiographic staging of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. We determined whether collaborative-wide data review and performance feedback would decrease the imaging rate in men with low risk prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Practices submitted standardized data, including the use and results of staging computerized tomography and bone scan, to a web based clinical registry of all men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. We identified all patients with low risk prostate cancer and compared imaging use patterns before and after practice level performance feedback and guideline review, which were provided at collaborative-wide meetings.
RESULTS: In MUSIC 813 patients were newly diagnosed with low risk prostate cancer during the 19-month study period. Of 410 patients diagnosed in the prefeedback period (phase I) 15 (3.7%) and 21 (5.2%) underwent bone scan and computerized tomography, respectively. Of 403 patients diagnosed after feedback (phase II) radiographic staging was done in 5 men (1.3%) with bone scan and in 13 (3.2%) with computerized tomography (p = 0.03 and 0.17, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of radiographic staging in men with newly diagnosed low risk prostate cancer was appropriately low. The imaging rate decreased even further after collaborative education and performance feedback. MUSIC appears to be a successful tool for quality improvement, affecting practice patterns and increasing efficiency of care.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnostic imaging; feedback; physician's practice patterns; prostatic neoplasms; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25444985     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  10 in total

Review 1.  Overuse of Health Care Services in the Management of Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shrujal S Baxi; Minal Kale; Salomeh Keyhani; Benjamin R Roman; Annie Yang; Antonio P Derosa; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Systematic review of interventions that improve provider compliance to imaging guidelines for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samuel M Pettit; David Mikhail; Michael Feuerstein
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.052

3.  Automating the Determination of Prostate Cancer Risk Strata From Electronic Medical Records.

Authors:  Justin R Gregg; Maximilian Lang; Lucy L Wang; Matthew J Resnick; Sandeep K Jain; Jeremy L Warner; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2017-06-08

4.  Physician-Driven Variation in Nonrecommended Services Among Older Adults Diagnosed With Cancer.

Authors:  Allison Lipitz-Snyderman; Camelia S Sima; Coral L Atoria; Elena B Elkin; Christopher Anderson; Victoria Blinder; Chiaojung Jillian Tsai; Katherine S Panageas; Peter B Bach
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 5.  Quality of care and economic considerations of active surveillance of men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher P Filson
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-04

6.  Prospective monitoring of imaging guideline adherence by physicians in a surgical collaborative: comparison of statistical process control methods for detecting outlying performance.

Authors:  Michael Inadomi; Karandeep Singh; Ji Qi; Rodney Dunn; Susan Linsell; Brian Denton; Patrick Hurley; Eduardo Kleer; James Montie; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Learning from the "tail end" of de-implementation: the case of chemical castration for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ted A Skolarus; Jane Forman; Jordan B Sparks; Tabitha Metreger; Sarah T Hawley; Megan V Caram; Lesly Dossett; Alan Paniagua-Cruz; Danil V Makarov; John T Leppert; Jeremy B Shelton; Kristian D Stensland; Brent K Hollenbeck; Vahakn Shahinian; Anne E Sales; Daniela A Wittmann
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-10-28

Review 8.  The past, present, and future of urological quality improvement collaboratives.

Authors:  Adam C Reese; Serge Ginzburg
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05

9.  Association Between Guideline-Discordant Prostate Cancer Imaging Rates and Health Care Service Among Veterans and Medicare Recipients.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Shannon Ciprut; Dawn Walter; Matthew Kelly; Heather T Gold; Xiao-Hua Zhou; Scott E Sherman; Ronald Scott Braithwaite; Cary Gross; Steven Zeliadt
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-08-03

10.  De-implementing low-value care in cancer care delivery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amir Alishahi Tabriz; Kea Turner; Alecia Clary; Young-Rock Hong; Oliver T Nguyen; Grace Wei; Rebecca B Carlson; Sarah A Birken
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 7.327

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.