Literature DB >> 25444780

Incentive salience attribution under reward uncertainty: A Pavlovian model.

Patrick Anselme1.   

Abstract

There is a vast literature on the behavioural effects of partial reinforcement in Pavlovian conditioning. Compared with animals receiving continuous reinforcement, partially rewarded animals typically show (a) a slower development of the conditioned response (CR) early in training and (b) a higher asymptotic level of the CR later in training. This phenomenon is known as the partial reinforcement acquisition effect (PRAE). Learning models of Pavlovian conditioning fail to account for it. In accordance with the incentive salience hypothesis, it is here argued that incentive motivation (or 'wanting') plays a more direct role in controlling behaviour than does learning, and reward uncertainty is shown to have an excitatory effect on incentive motivation. The psychological origin of that effect is discussed and a computational model integrating this new interpretation is developed. Many features of CRs under partial reinforcement emerge from this model.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dopamine; Frustration; Learning; Motivation; Partial reinforcement

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25444780     DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Processes        ISSN: 0376-6357            Impact factor:   1.777


  9 in total

1.  Age differences in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning and extinction in rats.

Authors:  Heidi C Meyer; David J Bucci
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-10-11

2.  Amphetamine-induced sensitization and reward uncertainty similarly enhance incentive salience for conditioned cues.

Authors:  Mike J F Robinson; Patrick Anselme; Kristen Suchomel; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Suboptimal choice in rats: Incentive salience attribution promotes maladaptive decision-making.

Authors:  Jonathan J Chow; Aaron P Smith; A George Wilson; Thomas R Zentall; Joshua S Beckmann
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The role of 'jackpot' stimuli in maladaptive decision-making: dissociable effects of D1/D2 receptor agonists and antagonists.

Authors:  Aaron P Smith; Rebecca S Hofford; Thomas R Zentall; Joshua S Beckmann
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-02-18       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  The Straw That Broke the Camel's Back: Natural Variations in 17β-Estradiol and COMT-Val158Met Genotype Interact in the Modulation of Model-Free and Model-Based Control.

Authors:  Esther K Diekhof; Andra Geana; Frederike Ohm; Bradley B Doll; Michael J Frank
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core.

Authors:  Bryan F Singer; Myranda A Bryan; Pavlo Popov; Raymond Scarff; Cody Carter; Erin Wright; Brandon J Aragona; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.460

7.  The origins of individual differences in how learning is expressed in rats: A general-process perspective.

Authors:  E Patitucci; A J D Nelson; Dominic M Dwyer; R C Honey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.478

8.  "Wanting" versus "needing" related value: An fMRI meta-analysis.

Authors:  Juvenal Bosulu; Max-Antoine Allaire; Laurence Tremblay-Grénier; Yi Luo; Simon Eickhoff; Sébastien Hétu
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.405

9.  Rats that sign-track are resistant to Pavlovian but not instrumental extinction.

Authors:  Allison M Ahrens; Bryan F Singer; Christopher J Fitzpatrick; Jonathan D Morrow; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.352

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.