Simone Matsuda1, Tiffany Tam2, Rishi P Singh2, Peter K Kaiser2, Daniel Petkovsek2, Maria Teresa Zanella3, Justis P Ehlers4. 1. Ophthalmic Imaging Center, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America; Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil. 2. Ophthalmic Imaging Center, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America. 3. Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil. 4. Ophthalmic Imaging Center, Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America. Electronic address: ehlersj@ccf.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of insulin therapy on the outcomes of diabetic macular edema (DME) treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in people with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A retrospective consecutive case series of 95 patients with type 2 diabetes and DME who were treated with anti-VEGF therapy. We examined 2 cohorts: patients taking only oral antidiabetic agents and patients on insulin therapy. The main outcome measures were change in visual acuity and change in central subfield macular thickness measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The additional variables analyzed included glycated hemoglobin (A1C), creatinine, blood pressure and body mass index and their correlations with clinical findings. RESULTS: Both groups had a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity (oral antidiabetic agents group: 20/61 to 20/49, p=0.003; insulin therapy group: 20/76 to 20/56, p=0.005). There was no difference between groups at initial or 12-month examination (p=0.239 and p=0.489, respectively). From an anatomic standpoint, central subfield macular thickness also improved significantly in both groups: from 454.7 μm to 354.9 μm (p<0.001) in the oral antidiabetic agents group and from 471.5 μm to 368.4 μm (p<0.001) in the insulin therapy group. Again, there was no significant difference between groups at initial or 12-month follow-up examinations (p=0.586 and p=0.591, respectively). Mean A1C levels remained relatively stable during the follow up in both groups. CONCLUSION: Anti-VEGF therapy is a useful treatment for DME. This study suggests that chronic insulin therapy, compared with oral antidiabetic agents, does not modify the anatomic or functional effectiveness of DME treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of insulin therapy on the outcomes of diabetic macular edema (DME) treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in people with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A retrospective consecutive case series of 95 patients with type 2 diabetes and DME who were treated with anti-VEGF therapy. We examined 2 cohorts: patients taking only oral antidiabetic agents and patients on insulin therapy. The main outcome measures were change in visual acuity and change in central subfield macular thickness measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The additional variables analyzed included glycated hemoglobin (A1C), creatinine, blood pressure and body mass index and their correlations with clinical findings. RESULTS: Both groups had a statistically significant improvement in visual acuity (oral antidiabetic agents group: 20/61 to 20/49, p=0.003; insulin therapy group: 20/76 to 20/56, p=0.005). There was no difference between groups at initial or 12-month examination (p=0.239 and p=0.489, respectively). From an anatomic standpoint, central subfield macular thickness also improved significantly in both groups: from 454.7 μm to 354.9 μm (p<0.001) in the oral antidiabetic agents group and from 471.5 μm to 368.4 μm (p<0.001) in the insulin therapy group. Again, there was no significant difference between groups at initial or 12-month follow-up examinations (p=0.586 and p=0.591, respectively). Mean A1C levels remained relatively stable during the follow up in both groups. CONCLUSION: Anti-VEGF therapy is a useful treatment for DME. This study suggests that chronic insulin therapy, compared with oral antidiabetic agents, does not modify the anatomic or functional effectiveness of DME treatment.
Authors: Vassiliki Poulaki; Wenying Qin; Antonia M Joussen; Peter Hurlbut; Stanley J Wiegand; John Rudge; George D Yancopoulos; Anthony P Adamis Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Quan Dong Nguyen; David M Brown; Dennis M Marcus; David S Boyer; Sunil Patel; Leonard Feiner; Andrea Gibson; Judy Sy; Amy Chen Rundle; J Jill Hopkins; Roman G Rubio; Jason S Ehrlich Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2012-02-11 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ranjan Rajendram; Samantha Fraser-Bell; Andrew Kaines; Michel Michaelides; Robin D Hamilton; Simona Degli Esposti; Tunde Peto; Catherine Egan; Catey Bunce; Richard David Leslie; Philip G Hykin Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2012-08
Authors: Simone Matsuda; Tiffany Tam; Rishi P Singh; Peter K Kaiser; Dan Petkovsek; Glaucia Carneiro; Maria Teresa Zanella; Justis P Ehlers Journal: J Diabetes Complications Date: 2013-11-27 Impact factor: 2.852