Literature DB >> 25444589

Inter-individual variation in the after-effect of paired associative stimulation can be predicted from short-interval intracortical inhibition with the threshold tracking method.

Nagako Murase1, Bülent Cengiz2, John C Rothwell2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Paired associative stimulation (PAS), which is used to test a long term potentiation (LTP)-like effect, involves repeated pairing of peripheral somatosensory input with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) given 25 ms later over M1 (PAS25). The effect is usually quantified as an increase in amplitude of motor evoked potentials evoked by single pulse TMS. However, the effect varies greatly between individuals. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that variability depends on either the individual level of GABAAergic activity in cortex, or on the proportion of late I-wave inputs that are evoked by TMS pulses during PAS25. Low levels of GABA facilitate LTP, whereas late I-waves are the site of facilitation after PAS25.
METHODS: GABAAergic inhibition was quantified using SICI measured with a threshold tracking method (SICI-TT) before and after PAS25 in 18 healthy volunteers.
RESULTS: The PAS25 effect correlated with the level of SICI-TT (r = 0.6) before PAS25. Contrary to the GABA hypothesis, people who had good facilitation after PAS25 had good inhibition measured by SICI-TT. On completion of the PAS25 protocol, SICI-TT was reduced by an amount correlated with the size of the PAS25 effect (r = 0.5-0.6 at an interstimulus interval of 2.5-3.0 ms).
CONCLUSIONS: SICI is known to target late I-waves, thus SICI-TT will depend on the proportion of late I-waves evoked by the TMS test pulse. If the pulse recruits a large fraction of late I-waves, individuals will show good SICI-TT; they will also respond well to PAS25 since this relies on facilitation of late I-waves.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  I-wave; Paired associative stimulation; Short-interval intracortical inhibition; Short-latency afferent inhibition; Variability

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25444589     DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  14 in total

1.  Desynchronization does not contribute to intracortical inhibition and facilitation: a paired-pulse paradigm study combined with TST.

Authors:  L Caranzano; M A Stephan; F R Herrmann; D H Benninger
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  GABA and primary motor cortex inhibition in young and older adults: a multimodal reliability study.

Authors:  Ronan A Mooney; John Cirillo; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Longitudinal assessment of 1H-MRS (GABA and Glx) and TMS measures of cortical inhibition and facilitation in the sensorimotor cortex.

Authors:  Marie Chantal Ferland; Jean-Marc Therrien-Blanchet; Geneviève Lefebvre; Gabrielle Klees-Themens; Sébastien Proulx; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Age-related changes in late I-waves influence motor cortex plasticity induction in older adults.

Authors:  George M Opie; John Cirillo; John G Semmler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Associative plasticity in the human motor cortex is enhanced by concurrently targeting separate muscle representations with excitatory and inhibitory protocols.

Authors:  Marc R Kamke; Abbey S Nydam; Martin V Sale; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Assessment of cortical inhibition depends on inter individual differences in the excitatory neural populations activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Andris Cerins; Daniel Corp; George Opie; Michael Do; Bridgette Speranza; Jason He; Pamela Barhoun; Ian Fuelscher; Peter Enticott; Christian Hyde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Efficacy and interindividual variability in motor-cortex plasticity following anodal tDCS and paired-associative stimulation.

Authors:  Wolfgang Strube; Tilmann Bunse; Berend Malchow; Alkomiet Hasan
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.599

8.  Brain State-Dependent Closed-Loop Modulation of Paired Associative Stimulation Controlled by Sensorimotor Desynchronization.

Authors:  Vladislav Royter; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 5.505

9.  Direct and crossed effects of somatosensory electrical stimulation on motor learning and neuronal plasticity in humans.

Authors:  M P Veldman; I Zijdewind; S Solnik; N A Maffiuletti; K M M Berghuis; M Javet; J Négyesi; T Hortobágyi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Increased threshold of short-latency motor evoked potentials in transgenic mice expressing Channelrhodopsin-2.

Authors:  Wei Wu; Wenhui Xiong; Ping Zhang; Lifang Chen; Jianqiao Fang; Christopher Shields; Xiao-Ming Xu; Xiaoming Jin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.