Nicoleta Ilie1, Bogna Stawarczyk2. 1. Senior Material Scientist, Department of Operative/Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology and Pedodontics, Ludwig-Maximilians University School of Dental Medicine Munich, Germany. Electronic address: nilie@dent.med.uni-muenchen.de. 2. Senior Material Scientist, Department of Prosthodontics, Ludwig-Maximilians University School of Dental Medicine Munich, Germany.
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Dual-polymerized luting composite resin cements would benefit from enhanced irradiance transmitted through a ceramic restoration. A quantification of the amount of transmitted light through translucent zirconia is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of light (360 to 540 nm) passing through translucent and conventional zirconia and a glass ceramic with respect to material thickness and different polymerizing modes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six translucent and a conventional zirconia (negative control) and a glass ceramic (positive control) were considered. Ten specimens of each material and thickness (.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3 mm) were fabricated (n=480). Zirconia materials were sintered according to manufacturers' instructions. The irradiance passing the different ceramics and thicknesses was measured with a violet-blue LED polymerizing unit in 3 polymerizing modes (plasma, high, and standard power mode) with a USB4000 Spectrometer. The polymerizing unit was placed directly on the specimen's surface. Data were analyzed with one and multivariate analysis and the Pearson correlation analysis (α=.05). RESULTS: In all materials, the translucency and its rate decreased exponentially according to the specimen thickness. The highest influence on the measured irradiance passing through translucent zirconia was exerted by ceramic thickness (P<.05, partial eta squared [ηP²]=.998), closely followed by polymerizing mode (ηP²=.973), while the effect of the material (P=.03, ηP²=.06) and mean grain size (P=.029, ηP²=.027) was significant but low. CONCLUSIONS: Zirconia was less translucent than the glass ceramic, but the translucency decreased more slowly with material thickness, thus approaching the translucency of glass ceramics at a specimen thicknesses of 2.5 to 3 mm.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Dual-polymerized luting composite resin cements would benefit from enhanced irradiance transmitted through a ceramic restoration. A quantification of the amount of transmitted light through translucent zirconia is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the amount of light (360 to 540 nm) passing through translucent and conventional zirconia and a glass ceramic with respect to material thickness and different polymerizing modes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six translucent and a conventional zirconia (negative control) and a glass ceramic (positive control) were considered. Ten specimens of each material and thickness (.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3 mm) were fabricated (n=480). Zirconia materials were sintered according to manufacturers' instructions. The irradiance passing the different ceramics and thicknesses was measured with a violet-blue LED polymerizing unit in 3 polymerizing modes (plasma, high, and standard power mode) with a USB4000 Spectrometer. The polymerizing unit was placed directly on the specimen's surface. Data were analyzed with one and multivariate analysis and the Pearson correlation analysis (α=.05). RESULTS: In all materials, the translucency and its rate decreased exponentially according to the specimen thickness. The highest influence on the measured irradiance passing through translucent zirconia was exerted by ceramic thickness (P<.05, partial eta squared [ηP²]=.998), closely followed by polymerizing mode (ηP²=.973), while the effect of the material (P=.03, ηP²=.06) and mean grain size (P=.029, ηP²=.027) was significant but low. CONCLUSIONS:Zirconia was less translucent than the glass ceramic, but the translucency decreased more slowly with material thickness, thus approaching the translucency of glass ceramics at a specimen thicknesses of 2.5 to 3 mm.