| Literature DB >> 34722770 |
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of veneering and aging on the translucency of newly introduced extra and high translucent zirconia with different thickness.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34722770 PMCID: PMC8553453 DOI: 10.1155/2021/7011021
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Chemical composition and manufacturer of materials.
| Material | Composition | Manufacturer |
|---|---|---|
| VITA YZ HT | ZrO2 (90-95%) | VITA Zahnfabrik, Germany |
|
| ||
| VITA YZ XT | ZrO2 (86-91%) | VITA Zahnfabrik, Germany |
Figure 1Size and form of specimens. (a) Nonveneered (XT, HT) and (b) veneered (XTV, HTV) groups. As light-colored ones present zirconia, dark-colored ones present veneering ceramics.
Mean TP values and standard deviations of veneered (XTV, HTV) and nonveneered (XT, HT) specimens.
| Thickness | Aging | XTV | XT | HTV | HT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | Before | 25.84 (0.66)A,a | 19.43 (0.50)B,a | ||
| After | 21.45 (0.69) | 16.06 (0.45) | |||
|
| |||||
| 0.5 + 0.5; 1 | Before | 21.98 (1.01)C,c | 21.72 (0.40)C,c | 17.43 (0.82)D,c | 14.95 (0.33)E,c |
| After | 19.02 (1.16) | 18.36 (0.80) | 15.46 (0.93) | 12.35 (0.41) | |
|
| |||||
| 0.5 + 1.0; 1.5 | Before | 17.24 (0.87)F,e | 16.82 (0.46)F,e | 14.36 (0.66)G,e | 10.65 (0.51)H,e |
| After | 15.04 (1.03) | 14.24 (0.49) | 12.89 (0.60) | 8.64 (0.36) | |
|
| |||||
| 0.5 + 1.5; 2 | Before | 12.34 (1.10)I,g | 11.63 (0.51)I,g | 9.54 (0.93)J,g | 6.67 (0.24)K,g |
| After | 10.51 (1.22) | 9.61 (0.48) | 8.38 (0.60) | 5.04 (0.34) | |
Same superscript uppercase letters and symbols indicate no statistically significant difference within each row. Same superscript lowercase letters indicate no statistically significant difference within each column (p < 0.05).
Difference between TP values of specimens before and after aging.
| Thickness | XTV | XT | HTV | HT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | -4.39 (0.67)A,b | -3.37 (0.49)B,f | ||
| 0.5 + 0.5; 1 | -2.96 (1.92)C,a | -3.36 (0.99)C,c | -1.97 (0.87)C,e | -2.60 (0.43)C,g |
| 0.5 + 1; 1.5 | -2.20 (1.02)DE,a | -2.58 (0.76)D,cd | -1.47 (0.96)E,e | -2.01 (0.43)DE,h |
| 0.5 + 1.5; 2 | -1.83 (1.94)F,a | -2.02 (0.22)F,d | -1.16 (0.73)F,e | -1.63 (0.39)F,h |
Same superscript uppercase letters indicate no statistically significant difference within each row. Same superscript lowercase letters indicate no statistically significant difference within each column (p < 0.05).
Mean CR values and standard deviations of veneered (XTV, HTV) and nonveneered (XT, HT) specimens.
| Thickness | Aging | XTV | XT | HTV | HT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | Before | 0.38 (0.02)A,a | 0.50 (0.02)B,a | ||
| After | 0.47 (0.02) | 0.58 (0.02) | |||
|
| |||||
| 0.5 + 0.5; 1 | Before | 0.46 (0.03)C,c | 0.48 (0.02)C,c | 0.57 (0.03)D,c | 0.64 (0.02)E,c |
| After | 0.52 (0.05) | 0.55 (0.02) | 0.62 (0.03) | 0.70 (0.02) | |
|
| |||||
| 0.5 + 1; 1.5 | Before | 0.57 (0.03)F,e | 0.58 (0.02)F,e | 0.65 (0.03)G,e | 0.73 (0.03)H,e |
| After | 0.62 (0.03) | 0.64 (0.02) | 0.69 (0.03) | 0.78 (0.02) | |
|
| |||||
| 0.5 + 1.5; 2 | Before | 0.68 (0.03)I,g | 0.70 (0.02)I,g | 0.76 (0.03)J,g | 0.90 (0.03)K,g |
| After | 0.72 (0.02) | 0.75 (0.03) | 0.79 (0.03) | 0.94 (0.03) | |
Same superscript uppercase letters and symbols indicate no statistically significant difference within each row. Same superscript lowercase letters indicate no statistically significant difference within each column (p < 0.05).
Difference between CR values of specimens before and after aging.
| Thickness | XTV | XT | HTV | HT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 0.09 (0.02)A,b | 0.08 (0.03)A,f | ||
| 0.5 + 0.5; 1 | 0.06 (0.05)B,a | 0.07 (0.03)B,bc | 0.05 (0.04)B,e | 0.06 (0.04)B,f |
| 0.5 + 1; 1.5 | 0.05 (0.04)C,a | 0.06 (0.02)C,cd | 0.04 (0.03)C,e | 0.05 (0.04)C,f |
| 0.5 + 1.5; 2 | 0.04 (0.03)D,a | 0.05 (0.02)D,cd | 0.03 (0.03)D,e | 0.04 (0.03)D,f |
Same superscript uppercase letters indicate no statistically significant difference within each row. Same superscript lowercase letters indicate no statistically significant difference within each column (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Pearson correlation analysis.