Literature DB >> 25443913

Impact of a single-surgeon learning curve on complications, positioning injuries, and renal function in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection.

Giovanni Battista Di Pierro1, Johann Gregory Wirth2, Matteo Ferrari3, Hansjörg Danuser3, Agostino Mattei4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a single-surgeon learning curve on complications, positioning injuries, and renal function in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection for intermediate- or high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer.
METHODS: From November 2008 to October 2012, a total of 233 consecutive patients were treated by a single surgeon experienced in open and laparoscopic procedures. Four subgroups of patients (1: cases 1-59; 2: 60-117; 3: 118-175; and 4: 176-233) were compared. Complications were classified according to the modified Clavien system. Serum creatine kinase, as an indicator of tissue injury, was measured before, during, and for 5 days after surgery. Renal function monitoring was started preoperatively and ended at discharge. Minimum follow-up was 3 months. Variables were compared using chi-square and Wilcoxon tests.
RESULTS: Overall, 115 complications were reported in 98 of 233 patients (42%) and significantly decreased after 175 procedures (P = .028). Minor complications (Clavien grades 1-2) represented the most frequent events (86 of 115 [75%]), with a significant drop in group 4 (P <.01). Similarly, the rate of positioning injuries (groups 1-4: 31%, 29%, 29%, and 7%, respectively) showed a significant improvement in group 4 (P = .023). Creatine kinase levels significantly decreased with increased experience (group 1 vs groups 2-4: P <.01). Renal function was unaltered postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: A surgeon with extensive open and laparoscopic experience presents a safe learning curve in regard to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. With increasing experience, the rates of overall and positioning-related complications significantly decrease after 175 procedures. No detrimental effect on renal function is to be expected.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25443913     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.06.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  9 in total

Review 1.  The safety of urologic robotic surgery depends on the skills of the surgeon.

Authors:  Erika Palagonia; Elio Mazzone; Geert De Naeyer; Frederiek D'Hondt; Justin Collins; Pawel Wisz; Fijs W B Van Leeuwen; Henk Van Der Poel; Peter Schatteman; Alexandre Mottrie; Paolo Dell'Oglio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Positive surgical margin rates during the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy learning curve of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon.

Authors:  Anthony F Adili; Julia Di Giovanni; Emma Kolesar; Nathan C Wong; Jen Hoogenes; Shawn Dason; Bobby Shayegan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Extended pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Impact of surgical volume on efficacy and complications in a single-surgeon series.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Di Pierro; Pietro Grande; Johann Gregory Wirth; Hansjörg Danuser; Agostino Mattei
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Robotic-assisted plate osteosynthesis of the anterior pelvic ring and acetabulum: an anatomical feasibility study.

Authors:  Markus A Küper; Alexander Trulson; Jonas Johannink; Bernhard Hirt; Artur Leis; Max Hoßfeld; Tina Histing; Steven C Herath; Bastian Amend
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-02-11

Review 5.  Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery: a systematic search and review.

Authors:  Nikolaos Grivas; Ioannis Zachos; Georgios Georgiadis; Markos Karavitakis; Vasilis Tzortzis; Charalampos Mamoulakis
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 6.  Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Immaculate F Nevis; Bahareh Vali; Caroline Higgins; Irfan Dhalla; David Urbach; Marcus Q Bernardini
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-07-16

7.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy may induce inguinal hernia within the first 2 years: An 11-year single-surgeon experience of >400 cases.

Authors:  Hong-Ray Chen; Hui-Kung Ting; Chien-Chang Kao; Chih-Wei Tsao; En Meng; Guang-Huan Sun; Dah-Shyong Yu; Sheng-Tang Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Patient positioning during minimally invasive surgery: what is current best practice?

Authors:  Jacqueline M Zillioux; Tracey L Krupski
Journal:  Robot Surg       Date:  2017-07-14

Review 9.  Complications in robotic urological surgeries and how to avoid them: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rafael Rocha Tourinho-Barbosa; Marcos Tobias-Machado; Adalberto Castro-Alfaro; Gabriel Ogaya-Pinies; Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-12-14
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.