Literature DB >> 25443385

Are virtual planning and guided surgery for head and neck reconstruction economically viable?

Daniel Fritz Zweifel1, Christian Simon2, Remy Hoarau3, Philippe Pasche4, Martin Broome5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Virtual planning and guided surgery with or without prebent or milled plates are becoming more and more common for mandibular reconstruction with fibular free flaps (FFFs). Although this excellent surgical option is being used more widely, the question of the additional cost of planning and cutting-guide production has to be discussed. In capped payment systems such additional costs have to be offset by other savings if there are no special provisions for extra funding. Our study was designed to determine whether using virtual planning and guided surgery resulted in time saved during surgery and whether this time gain resulted in self-funding of such planning through the time saved.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive cases of FFF surgery were evaluated during a 2-year period. Institutional data were used to determine the price of 1 minute of operative time. The time for fibula molding, plate adaptation, and insetting was recorded.
RESULTS: During the defined period, we performed 20 mandibular reconstructions using FFFs, 9 with virtual planning and guided surgery and 11 freehand cases. One minute of operative time was calculated to cost US $47.50. Multiplying this number by the time saved, we found that the additional cost of virtual planning was reduced from US $5,098 to US $1,231.50 with a prebent plate and from US $6,980 to US $3,113.50 for a milled plate.
CONCLUSIONS: Even in capped health care systems, virtual planning and guided surgery including prebent or milled plates are financially viable.
Copyright © 2015 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25443385     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.07.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  19 in total

1.  Assessment of the Learning Curve for Virtual Surgical Planning in Orbital Fractures.

Authors:  Tsung-Yen Hsieh; Mena Said; Raj D Dedhia; Mary Roz Timbang; Toby O Steele; Edward Bradley Strong
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-05-05

2.  Mandibular shape prediction model using machine learning techniques.

Authors:  Tania Camila Niño-Sandoval; Robinson Andrés Jaque; Fabio A González; Belmiro C E Vasconcelos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  3D Printing Provides a Precise Approach in the Treatment of Tetralogy of Fallot, Pulmonary Atresia with Major Aortopulmonary Collateral Arteries.

Authors:  Shafkat Anwar; Toby Rockefeller; Demetrios A Raptis; Pamela K Woodard; Pirooz Eghtesady
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-03

4.  Factors influencing CAD/CAM accuracy in fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Ahmed Hassan Sweed; Alessandro Remigio Bolzoni; Aleksandra Kadubiec; Giada Anna Beltramini; Alessandro Cherchi; Alessandro Baj
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  Virtual Surgery for the Nasal Airway: A Preliminary Report on Decision Support and Technology Acceptance.

Authors:  Derek L Vanhille; Guilherme J M Garcia; Onur Asan; Azadeh A T Borojeni; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; Sachin S Pawar; John S Rhee
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.611

6.  Customized mandibular reconstruction plates improve mechanical performance in a mandibular reconstruction model.

Authors:  Ralf Gutwald; Raimund Jaeger; Floor M Lambers
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 1.763

Review 7.  3D Printing is a Transformative Technology in Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Shafkat Anwar; Gautam K Singh; Jacob Miller; Monica Sharma; Peter Manning; Joseph J Billadello; Pirooz Eghtesady; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  JACC Basic Transl Sci       Date:  2018-05-30

8.  3D printing in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a nationwide survey among university and non-university hospitals and private practices in Germany.

Authors:  Andreas Pabst; Elisabeth Goetze; Daniel G E Thiem; Alexander K Bartella; Lukas Seifert; Fabian M Beiglboeck; Juliane Kröplin; Jürgen Hoffmann; Alexander-N Zeller
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Pre-contoured reconstruction plate fabricated via three-dimensional printed bending support.

Authors:  In-Seok Song; Jae-Jun Ryu; Young-Jun Choi; Ui-Lyong Lee
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-06-30

10.  Haptics-assisted Virtual Planning of Bone, Soft Tissue, and Vessels in Fibula Osteocutaneous Free Flaps.

Authors:  Pontus Olsson; Fredrik Nysjö; Andrés Rodríguez-Lorenzo; Andreas Thor; Jan-Michaél Hirsch; Ingrid B Carlbom
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-08-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.