Literature DB >> 33456685

Assessment of the Learning Curve for Virtual Surgical Planning in Orbital Fractures.

Tsung-Yen Hsieh1, Mena Said2, Raj D Dedhia1, Mary Roz Timbang1, Toby O Steele1, Edward Bradley Strong1.   

Abstract

Virtual surgical planning (VSP) is becoming more widely used in maxillofacial reconstruction and can be surgeon-based or industry-based. Surgeon-based models require software training but allow surgeon autonomy. We evaluate the learning curve for VSP through a prospective cohort study in which planning times and accuracy of 7 otolaryngology residents with no prior VSP experience were compared to that of a proficient user after a single training protocol and 6 planning sessions for orbital fractures. The average planning time for the first session was 21 minutes 41 seconds ± 6 minutes 11 seconds with an average maximum deviation of 2.5 ± 0.8 mm in the lateral orbit and 2.3 ± 0.6 mm in the superior orbit. The average planning time for the last session was 13 minutes 5 seconds ± 10 minutes and 7 seconds with an average maximum deviation of 1.4 ± 0.5 mm in the lateral orbit and 1.3 ± 0.4 mm in the superior orbit. Novice users reduced planning time by 40% and decreased maximum deviation of plans by 44% and 43% in the lateral and superior orbits, respectively, approaching that of the proficient user. Virtual surgical planning has a quick learning curve and may be incorporated into surgical training.
© The Author(s) 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computer aided surgery; maxillofacial trauma; orbital fractures; surgical training; virtual surgical planning

Year:  2020        PMID: 33456685      PMCID: PMC7797975          DOI: 10.1177/1943387520923940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  13 in total

1.  Influence of Mirrored Computed Tomograms on Decision-Making for Revising Surgically Treated Orbital Floor Fractures.

Authors:  Michael Blumer; Thomas Gander; Astrid Kruse Gujer; Burkhardt Seifert; Martin Rücker; Heinz-Theo Lübbers
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Customized "In-Office" Three-Dimensional Printing for Virtual Surgical Planning in Craniofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Bernardino M Mendez; Michael V Chiodo; Parit A Patel
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.046

3.  Preformed vs intraoperative bending of titanium mesh for orbital reconstruction.

Authors:  E Bradley Strong; Scott C Fuller; David F Wiley; Janina Zumbansen; M D Wilson; Marc C Metzger
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 3.497

4.  Computer-assisted planning, stereolithographic modeling, and intraoperative navigation for complex orbital reconstruction: a descriptive study in a preliminary cohort.

Authors:  R Bryan Bell; Michael R Markiewicz
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Correction of a Posttraumatic Orbital Deformity Using Three-Dimensional Modeling, Virtual Surgical Planning with Computer-Assisted Design, and Three-Dimensional Printing of Custom Implants.

Authors:  Kristopher M Day; Paul M Phillips; Larry A Sargent
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-04-03

Review 6.  Advances in oncologic head and neck reconstruction: systematic review and future considerations of virtual surgical planning and computer aided design/computer aided modeling.

Authors:  Katherine A Rodby; Sergey Turin; Ryan J Jacobs; Janet F Cruz; Victor J Hassid; Antonio Kolokythas; Anuja K Antony
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Computer-guided orbital reconstruction to improve outcomes.

Authors:  Randall A Bly; Shu-Hong Chang; Maria Cudejkova; Jack J Liu; Kris S Moe
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.611

8.  Virtual Surgical Planning: The Pearls and Pitfalls.

Authors:  Johnny I Efanov; Andrée-Anne Roy; Ke N Huang; Daniel E Borsuk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-01-17

Review 9.  Using 3D computer planning for complex reconstruction of mandibular defects.

Authors:  Diana N Kirke; Randall P Owen; Vincent Carrao; Brett A Miles; Jason I Kass
Journal:  Cancers Head Neck       Date:  2016-12-09

10.  Precision of posttraumatic primary orbital reconstruction using individually bent titanium mesh with and without navigation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Harald Essig; Lars Dressel; Majeed Rana; Madiha Rana; Horst Kokemueller; Martin Ruecker; Nils-Claudius Gellrich
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.151

View more
  1 in total

1.  Primary Orbital Reconstruction with Selective Laser Melting (SLM) of Patient-Specific Implants (PSIs): An Overview of 96 Surgically Treated Patients.

Authors:  Majeed Rana; Henriette L Moellmann; Lara Schorn; Julian Lommen; Madiha Rana; Max Wilkat; Karsten Hufendiek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.