Literature DB >> 25442088

Diagnostic performance of EUS in predicting advanced cancer among patients with Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia/early adenocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bashar J Qumseya1, Jessica Brown2, Merna Abraham1, Donna White3, Herbert Wolfsen1, Neil Gupta4, Prashanth Vennalaganti3, Prateek Sharma3, Michael B Wallace1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of EUS among patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or suspected mucosal carcinoma is controversial.
OBJECTIVE: To define the role of EUS in detecting advanced disease among patients with BE.
DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
SETTING: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central databases. PATIENTS: Patients with BE and HGD or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) who were referred for endoscopic evaluation and underwent EUS.
INTERVENTIONS: EUS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Pooled proportion of patients with advanced EAC identified by EUS among patients with BE who are referred for HGD or EAC (with or without visible lesions). Forest plots were used to contrast effect sizes in each of the studies and random effect models when tests of heterogeneity were significant (I(2) > 50% or P < .1 for the Q statistic).
RESULTS: Of 1278 articles, 47 were reviewed in full text, and 11 articles met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 656 patients. Based on a random-effects model, the proportion of patients with advanced disease detected on EUS was 14% (95% confidence interval, 8%-22%; P < .0001). In a subanalysis, the pooled proportion of patients with advanced disease on EUS in the absence of nodules was 4% (95% confidence interval, 2%-6%, P < .0001). LIMITATIONS: Significant heterogeneity among studies.
CONCLUSIONS: EUS will result in a change in the therapeutic approach among in a significant minority of patients with BE who are referred for HGD or EAC.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25442088     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.08.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  15 in total

1.  Quantitative evaluation of in vivo vital-dye fluorescence endoscopic imaging for the detection of Barrett's-associated neoplasia.

Authors:  Nadhi Thekkek; Michelle H Lee; Alexandros D Polydorides; Daniel G Rosen; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 2.  Neoadjuvant treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: response assessment before surgery and how to predict response to chemoradiation before starting treatment.

Authors:  Elfriede Bollschweiler; Arnulf H Hölscher; Matthias Schmidt; Ute Warnecke-Eberz
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 3.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnifying endoscopy for assessment of the invasion depth of shallow gastrointestinal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhang Tao; Chen Yan; He Zhao; Jiawei Tsauo; Xiaowu Zhang; Bing Qiu; Yanqing Zhao; Xiao Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  [Pretherapeutic misclassification of esophageal cancer and adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction : Possibilities and clinical consequences].

Authors:  I Gockel; F Lordick; O Lyros; N Kreuser; A H Hölscher; C Wittekind
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Correlation between endoscopic forceps biopsies and endoscopic mucosal resection with endoscopic ultrasound in patients with Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia and early cancer.

Authors:  Prashanthi N Thota; Alaa Sada; Madhusudhan R Sanaka; Sunguk Jang; Rocio Lopez; John R Goldblum; Xiuli Liu; John A Dumot; John Vargo; Gregory Zuccarro
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Endoscopic mucosal resection for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma: a Canadian experience.

Authors:  Denise Tami Yamashita; Chao Li; Drew Bethune; Harry Henteleff; James Ellsmere
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 7.  Recent Updates in the Endoscopic Diagnosis of Barrett's Oesophagus.

Authors:  Neel Sharma; Khek Yu Ho
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2016-04-15

8.  Quality indicators for Barrett's endotherapy (QBET): UK consensus statements for patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for Barrett's neoplasia.

Authors:  Durayd Alzoubaidi; Krish Ragunath; Sachin Wani; Ian D Penman; Nigel John Trudgill; Marnix Jansen; Matthew Banks; Pradeep Bhandari; Allan John Morris; Robert Willert; Phil Boger; Howard L Smart; Narayanasamy Ravi; Jason Dunn; Charles Gordon; Jayan Mannath; Inder Mainie; Massi di Pietro; Andrew M Veitch; Sally Thorpe; Cormac Magee; Martin Everson; Sarmed Sami; Paul Bassett; David Graham; Stephen Attwood; Oliver Pech; Prateek Sharma; Laurence B Lovat; Rehan Haidry
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-14

9.  Endoscopic Tumor Length Should Be Reincluded in the Esophageal Cancer Staging System: Analyses of 662 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Michele Valmasoni; Elisa Sefora Pierobon; Alberto Ruol; Carlo Alberto De Pasqual; Gianpietro Zanchettin; Lucia Moletta; Renato Salvador; Mario Costantini; Stefano Merigliano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Endoscopic ultrasound in oncology: An update of clinical applications in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Manuel Valero; Carlos Robles-Medranda
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2017-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.