Paul Z Y Liu1, Natalka Suchowerska2, David R McKenzie3. 1. School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, Australia. Electronic address: pliu@physics.usyd.edu.au. 2. School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, Australia. 3. School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diode detectors are commonly used in dosimetry, but have been reported to over-respond in small fields. Diode correction factors have been reported in the literature. The purpose of this study is to determine whether correction factors for a given diode type can be universally applied over a range of irradiation conditions including beams of different qualities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mathematical relation of diode over-response as a function of the field size was developed using previously published experimental data in which diodes were compared to an air core scintillation dosimeter. Correction factors calculated from the mathematical relation were then compared those available in the literature. RESULTS: The mathematical relation established between diode over-response and the field size was found to predict the measured diode correction factors for fields between 5 and 30 mm in width. The average deviation between measured and predicted over-response was 0.32% for IBA SFD and PTW Type E diodes. Diode over-response was found to be not strongly dependent on the type of linac, the method of collimation or the measurement depth. CONCLUSIONS: The mathematical relation was found to agree with published diode correction factors derived from Monte Carlo simulations and measurements, indicating that correction factors are robust in their transportability between different radiation beams.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diode detectors are commonly used in dosimetry, but have been reported to over-respond in small fields. Diode correction factors have been reported in the literature. The purpose of this study is to determine whether correction factors for a given diode type can be universally applied over a range of irradiation conditions including beams of different qualities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A mathematical relation of diode over-response as a function of the field size was developed using previously published experimental data in which diodes were compared to an air core scintillation dosimeter. Correction factors calculated from the mathematical relation were then compared those available in the literature. RESULTS: The mathematical relation established between diode over-response and the field size was found to predict the measured diode correction factors for fields between 5 and 30 mm in width. The average deviation between measured and predicted over-response was 0.32% for IBA SFD and PTW Type E diodes. Diode over-response was found to be not strongly dependent on the type of linac, the method of collimation or the measurement depth. CONCLUSIONS: The mathematical relation was found to agree with published diode correction factors derived from Monte Carlo simulations and measurements, indicating that correction factors are robust in their transportability between different radiation beams.
Authors: Madelaine K Tyler; Paul Z Y Liu; Christopher Lee; David R McKenzie; Natalka Suchowerska Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2016-05-08 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Khalsa Al Shukaili; Stéphanie Corde; Marco Petasecca; Vladimir Pereveratylo; Michael Lerch; Michael Jackson; Anatoly Rosenfeld Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 2.102