Sylvia Brandt1, Laura Perez2, Nino Künzli2, Fred Lurmann3, John Wilson4, Manuel Pastor5, Rob McConnell6. 1. Center for Public Policy and Administration and the Department of Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Mass. Electronic address: sylvbrandt@gmail.com. 2. University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland. 3. Sonoma Technology, Petaluma, Calif. 4. Spatial Science Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif. 5. Program for Environmental and Regional Equity, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif. 6. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that near-roadway air pollution (NRP) exposure causes childhood asthma. The associated costs are not well documented. OBJECTIVE: We estimated the cost of childhood asthma attributable to residential NRP exposure and regional ozone (O3) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels in Los Angeles County. We developed a novel approach to apportion the costs between these exposures under different pollution scenarios. METHODS: We integrated results from a study of willingness to pay to reduce the burden of asthma with results from studies of health care use and charges to estimate the costs of an asthma case and exacerbation. We applied those costs to the number of asthma cases and exacerbations caused by regional pollution in 2007 and to hypothetical scenarios of a 20% reduction in regional pollution in combination with a 20% reduction or increase in the proportion of the total population living within 75 m of a major roadway. RESULTS: Cost of air pollution-related asthma in Los Angeles County in 2007 was $441 million for O3 and $202 million for NO2 in 2010 dollars. Cost of routine care (care in absence of exacerbation) accounted for 18% of the combined NRP and O3 cost and 39% of the combined NRP and NO2 cost; these costs were not recognized in previous analyses. NRP-attributable asthma accounted for 43% (O3) to 51% (NO2) of the total annual cost of exacerbations and routine care associated with pollution. Hypothetical scenarios showed that costs from increased NRP exposure might offset savings from reduced regional pollution. CONCLUSIONS: Our model disaggregates the costs of regional pollution and NRP exposure and illustrates how they might vary under alternative exposure scenarios. The cost of air pollution is a substantial burden on families and an economic loss for society.
BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that near-roadway air pollution (NRP) exposure causes childhood asthma. The associated costs are not well documented. OBJECTIVE: We estimated the cost of childhood asthma attributable to residential NRP exposure and regional ozone (O3) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels in Los Angeles County. We developed a novel approach to apportion the costs between these exposures under different pollution scenarios. METHODS: We integrated results from a study of willingness to pay to reduce the burden of asthma with results from studies of health care use and charges to estimate the costs of an asthma case and exacerbation. We applied those costs to the number of asthma cases and exacerbations caused by regional pollution in 2007 and to hypothetical scenarios of a 20% reduction in regional pollution in combination with a 20% reduction or increase in the proportion of the total population living within 75 m of a major roadway. RESULTS: Cost of air pollution-related asthma in Los Angeles County in 2007 was $441 million for O3 and $202 million for NO2 in 2010 dollars. Cost of routine care (care in absence of exacerbation) accounted for 18% of the combined NRP and O3 cost and 39% of the combined NRP and NO2 cost; these costs were not recognized in previous analyses. NRP-attributable asthma accounted for 43% (O3) to 51% (NO2) of the total annual cost of exacerbations and routine care associated with pollution. Hypothetical scenarios showed that costs from increased NRP exposure might offset savings from reduced regional pollution. CONCLUSIONS: Our model disaggregates the costs of regional pollution and NRP exposure and illustrates how they might vary under alternative exposure scenarios. The cost of air pollution is a substantial burden on families and an economic loss for society.
Authors: A B Chang; C F Robertson; P P van Asperen; N J Glasgow; I B Masters; C M Mellis; L I Landau; L Teoh; P S Morris Journal: Trials Date: 2010-11-06 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Patrick W Sullivan; Karen L Smith; Vahram H Ghushchyan; Denise R Globe; Shao-Lee Lin; Gary Globe Journal: J Asthma Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 2.515
Authors: Laura Perez; Fred Lurmann; John Wilson; Manuel Pastor; Sylvia J Brandt; Nino Künzli; Rob McConnell Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Rob McConnell; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Kejia Wang; Robert Urman; Hanna Hong; Jennifer Unger; Jonathan Samet; Adam Leventhal; Kiros Berhane Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-04-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Kiros Berhane; Chih-Chieh Chang; Rob McConnell; W James Gauderman; Edward Avol; Ed Rapapport; Robert Urman; Fred Lurmann; Frank Gilliland Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-04-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Robert Urman; Sandrah Eckel; Huiyu Deng; Kiros Berhane; Ed Avol; Fred Lurmann; Rob McConnell; Frank Gilliland Journal: Environ Epidemiol Date: 2018-06
Authors: Steven G Brown; Bryan Penfold; Anondo Mukherjee; Karin Landsberg; Douglas S Eisinger Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jason G Su; Meredith A Barrett; Kelly Henderson; Olivier Humblet; Ted Smith; James W Sublett; LaQuandra Nesbitt; Chris Hogg; David Van Sickle; James L Sublett Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2016-06-24 Impact factor: 9.031