Noga Fuchs Weizman1, Elmira Manoucheri1, Allison F Vitonis2, Gloria J Hicks3, Jon I Einarsson1, Sarah L Cohen4. 1. Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Simulation, Training, Research, and Technology Utilization System (STRATUS) Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: scohen20@partners.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to design and validate a new assessment tool for laparoscopic vaginal cuff suturing in a box trainer. DESIGN: A primary grading tool was constructed including a novel checklist component and a previously validated global rating scale. A four-step validation process was then undertaken. Face validity was determined by a survey of a panel of experts in the field of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Content validity was assessed via analysis of consistency and variability of the experts' ratings, and items were removed or rephrased according to the experts' comments. PARTICIPANTS: Overall, five novices and five expert laparoscopic surgeons were videotaped performing suture closure of a latex vaginal cuff model in a box trainer. The videotapes were reviewed by two raters. Discriminate validity, along with interrater and intrarater reliabilities, was assessed by analysis of the video ratings. SETTING: The Simulation, Training, Research, and Technology Utilization System center at Brigham and Women's Hospital, a tertiary medical center in Boston, MA. RESULTS: The final assessment tool is presented. CONCLUSION: We have validated an assessment tool for vaginal cuff suturing in a box trainer.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to design and validate a new assessment tool for laparoscopic vaginal cuff suturing in a box trainer. DESIGN: A primary grading tool was constructed including a novel checklist component and a previously validated global rating scale. A four-step validation process was then undertaken. Face validity was determined by a survey of a panel of experts in the field of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Content validity was assessed via analysis of consistency and variability of the experts' ratings, and items were removed or rephrased according to the experts' comments. PARTICIPANTS: Overall, five novices and five expert laparoscopic surgeons were videotaped performing suture closure of a latex vaginal cuff model in a box trainer. The videotapes were reviewed by two raters. Discriminate validity, along with interrater and intrarater reliabilities, was assessed by analysis of the video ratings. SETTING: The Simulation, Training, Research, and Technology Utilization System center at Brigham and Women's Hospital, a tertiary medical center in Boston, MA. RESULTS: The final assessment tool is presented. CONCLUSION: We have validated an assessment tool for vaginal cuff suturing in a box trainer.