Literature DB >> 2543914

Detection and characterization of a low affinity form of cytosolic Ah receptor in livers of mice nonresponsive to induction of cytochrome P1-450 by 3-methylcholanthrene.

A B Okey1, L M Vella, P A Harper.   

Abstract

Ah "nonresponsive" mice (prototype, DBA/2) show no significant increase in hepatic P1-450 (P450IA1) when treated with 3-methylcholanthrene or other nonhalogenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Potent halogenated aromatics such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) induce P1-450 in liver of nonresponsive mice, but the dose required is approximately 15-fold higher than in "responsive" mice (prototype, C57BL/6). It was postulated several years ago that the genetic basis of nonresponsiveness was a "defect" in the Ah receptor, which normally binds TCDD and other inducers and mediates the induction process. Cytosolic Ah receptor hitherto had not been detectable in hepatic cytosol from nonresponsive mice. Using a modified sucrose gradient assay that we developed in studies on human tissue [Cancer Res. 47:4861-4868 (1987)], we now have detected cytosolic Ah receptor in nonresponsive mice. By saturation analysis, the concentration of specific binding sites for [3H]TCDD in hepatic cytosol from DBA/2J mice was (mean +/- SE) 55 +/- 6.6 fmol/mg of cytosolic protein (n = 21) compared with 133 +/- 7.1 fmol/mg (n = 21) in responsive C57BL/6J mice. Ah receptor also was detected in significant concentrations in other nonresponsive strains; SWR/J, AKR/J, RF/J, and DBA/2N. The sedimentation coefficient on sucrose gradients was the same (approximately 9 S) in nonresponsive as in responsive strains. The major difference in nonresponsive mice is that hepatic cytosolic Ah receptor has an apparent affinity for [3H]TCDD that is about 10-fold lower than in responsive strains; Kd in DBA/2J mice = 16 +/- 2.5 nM (n = 21) and Kd in C57BL/6J mice = 1.8 +/- 0.2 nM (n = 21). Thus, nonresponsive mice do possess the cytosolic Ah receptor in liver. However, the receptor is present in reduced concentration and appears to be a low affinity form, possibly as the result of a mutation in the gene(s) coding for the receptor protein(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2543914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  31 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of dioxin response elements in human, mouse and rat genomic sequences.

Authors:  Y V Sun; D R Boverhof; L D Burgoon; M R Fielden; T R Zacharewski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor by TCDD prevents diabetes in NOD mice and increases Foxp3+ T cells in pancreatic lymph nodes.

Authors:  Nancy I Kerkvliet; Linda B Steppan; William Vorachek; Shannon Oda; David Farrer; Carmen P Wong; Duy Pham; Dan V Mourich
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.196

Review 3.  The Ah receptor and the mechanism of dioxin toxicity.

Authors:  J P Landers; N J Bunce
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 4.  Oral tolerance.

Authors:  Howard L Weiner; Andre Pires da Cunha; Francisco Quintana; Henry Wu
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 5.  Oral tolerance.

Authors:  Ana M C Faria; Howard L Weiner
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.988

6.  Comparative analysis of temporal and dose-dependent TCDD-elicited gene expression in human, mouse, and rat primary hepatocytes.

Authors:  Agnes L Forgacs; Edward Dere; Michelle M Angrish; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Distinct response to dioxin in an arylhydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-humanized mouse.

Authors:  Takashi Moriguchi; Hozumi Motohashi; Tomonori Hosoya; Osamu Nakajima; Satoru Takahashi; Seiichiroh Ohsako; Yasunobu Aoki; Noriko Nishimura; Chiharu Tohyama; Yoshiaki Fujii-Kuriyama; Masayuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacts with c-Maf to promote the differentiation of type 1 regulatory T cells induced by IL-27.

Authors:  Lionel Apetoh; Francisco J Quintana; Caroline Pot; Nicole Joller; Sheng Xiao; Deepak Kumar; Evan J Burns; David H Sherr; Howard L Weiner; Vijay K Kuchroo
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 25.606

9.  Toxicogenomic evaluation of long-term hepatic effects of TCDD in immature, ovariectomized C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Anna K Kopec; Darrell R Boverhof; Rance Nault; Jack R Harkema; Colleen Tashiro; Dave Potter; Bonnie Sharratt; Brock Chittim; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Cloning of the Ah-receptor cDNA reveals a distinctive ligand-activated transcription factor.

Authors:  K M Burbach; A Poland; C A Bradfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.