Literature DB >> 25439131

Development and application of the adverse outcome pathway framework for understanding and predicting chronic toxicity: I. Challenges and research needs in ecotoxicology.

Ksenia J Groh1, Raquel N Carvalho2, James K Chipman3, Nancy D Denslow4, Marlies Halder5, Cheryl A Murphy6, Dick Roelofs7, Alexandra Rolaki5, Kristin Schirmer8, Karen H Watanabe9.   

Abstract

To elucidate the effects of chemicals on populations of different species in the environment, efficient testing and modeling approaches are needed that consider multiple stressors and allow reliable extrapolation of responses across species. An adverse outcome pathway (AOP) is a concept that provides a framework for organizing knowledge about the progression of toxicity events across scales of biological organization that lead to adverse outcomes relevant for risk assessment. In this paper, we focus on exploring how the AOP concept can be used to guide research aimed at improving both our understanding of chronic toxicity, including delayed toxicity as well as epigenetic and transgenerational effects of chemicals, and our ability to predict adverse outcomes. A better understanding of the influence of subtle toxicity on individual and population fitness would support a broader integration of sublethal endpoints into risk assessment frameworks. Detailed mechanistic knowledge would facilitate the development of alternative testing methods as well as help prioritize higher tier toxicity testing. We argue that targeted development of AOPs supports both of these aspects by promoting the elucidation of molecular mechanisms and their contribution to relevant toxicity outcomes across biological scales. We further discuss information requirements and challenges in application of AOPs for chemical- and site-specific risk assessment and for extrapolation across species. We provide recommendations for potential extension of the AOP framework to incorporate information on exposure, toxicokinetics and situation-specific ecological contexts, and discuss common interfaces that can be employed to couple AOPs with computational modeling approaches and with evolutionary life history theory. The extended AOP framework can serve as a venue for integration of knowledge derived from various sources, including empirical data as well as molecular, quantitative and evolutionary-based models describing species responses to toxicants. This will allow a more efficient application of AOP knowledge for quantitative chemical- and site-specific risk assessment as well as for extrapolation across species in the future.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP); Chronic toxicity; Cross-species extrapolation; Ecotoxicological risk assessment; Extrapolation from individual to population; Toxicokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25439131     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  28 in total

1.  Proposal to optimize ecotoxicological evaluation of wastewater treated by conventional biological and ozonation processes.

Authors:  Adriana Wigh; Alain Devaux; Vanessa Brosselin; Adriana Gonzalez-Ospina; Bruno Domenjoud; Selim Aït-Aïssa; Nicolas Creusot; Antoine Gosset; Christine Bazin; Sylvie Bony
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Accelerating Adverse Outcome Pathway Development Using Publicly Available Data Sources.

Authors:  Noffisat O Oki; Mark D Nelms; Shannon M Bell; Holly M Mortensen; Stephen W Edwards
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2016-03

Review 3.  From the exposome to mechanistic understanding of chemical-induced adverse effects.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Jörg Hackermüller; Tobias Polte; Stefan Scholz; Achim Aigner; Rolf Altenburger; Alexander Böhme; Stephanie K Bopp; Werner Brack; Wibke Busch; Marc Chadeau-Hyam; Adrian Covaci; Adolf Eisenträger; James J Galligan; Natalia Garcia-Reyero; Thomas Hartung; Michaela Hein; Gunda Herberth; Annika Jahnke; Jos Kleinjans; Nils Klüver; Martin Krauss; Marja Lamoree; Irina Lehmann; Till Luckenbach; Gary W Miller; Andrea Müller; David H Phillips; Thorsten Reemtsma; Ulrike Rolle-Kampczyk; Gerrit Schüürmann; Benno Schwikowski; Yu-Mei Tan; Saskia Trump; Susanne Walter-Rohde; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 4.  Practical approaches to adverse outcome pathway development and weight-of-evidence evaluation as illustrated by ecotoxicological case studies.

Authors:  Kellie A Fay; Daniel L Villeneuve; Carlie A LaLone; You Song; Knut Erik Tollefsen; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 5.  A framework for predicting impacts on ecosystem services from (sub)organismal responses to chemicals.

Authors:  Valery E Forbes; Chris J Salice; Bjorn Birnir; Randy J F Bruins; Peter Calow; Virginie Ducrot; Nika Galic; Kristina Garber; Bret C Harvey; Henriette Jager; Andrew Kanarek; Robert Pastorok; Steve F Railsback; Richard Rebarber; Pernille Thorbek
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Marine microplastics spell big problems for future generations.

Authors:  Tamara S Galloway; Ceri N Lewis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mixed phylogenetic signal in fish toxicity data across chemical classes.

Authors:  Andrew Hylton; Ylenia Chiari; Isabella Capellini; Mace G Barron; Scott Glaberman
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.657

Review 8.  Ecotoxico-lipidomics: An emerging concept to understand chemical-metabolic relationships in comparative fish models.

Authors:  David A Dreier; John A Bowden; Juan J Aristizabal-Henao; Nancy D Denslow; Christopher J Martyniuk
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.674

9.  Evaluating the Impact of Uncertainties in Clearance and Exposure When Prioritizing Chemicals Screened in High-Throughput Assays.

Authors:  Jeremy A Leonard; Ashley Sobel Leonard; Daniel T Chang; Stephen Edwards; Jingtao Lu; Steven Scholle; Phillip Key; Maxwell Winter; Kristin Isaacs; Yu-Mei Tan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  A Computational Model of the Rainbow Trout Hypothalamus-Pituitary-Ovary-Liver Axis.

Authors:  Kendall Gillies; Stephen M Krone; James J Nagler; Irvin R Schultz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.