Literature DB >> 25437265

Alcohol evaluations and acceptability: examining descriptive and injunctive norms among heavy drinkers.

Dawn W Foster1, Clayton Neighbors2, Heather Krieger2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed descriptive and injunctive norms, evaluations of alcohol consequences, and acceptability of drinking.
METHODS: Participants were 248 heavy-drinking undergraduates (81.05% female; Mage=23.45).
RESULTS: Stronger perceptions of descriptive and injunctive norms for drinking and more positive evaluations of alcohol consequences were positively associated with drinking and the number of drinks considered acceptable. Descriptive and injunctive norms interacted, indicating that injunctive norms were linked with number of acceptable drinks among those with higher descriptive norms. Descriptive norms and evaluations of consequences interacted, indicating that descriptive norms were positively linked with number of acceptable drinks among those with negative evaluations of consequences; however, among those with positive evaluations of consequences, descriptive norms were negatively associated with number of acceptable drinks. Injunctive norms and evaluations of consequences interacted, indicating that injunctive norms were positively associated with number of acceptable drinks, particularly among those with positive evaluations of consequences. A three-way interaction emerged between injunctive and descriptive norms and evaluations of consequences, suggesting that injunctive norms and the number of acceptable drinks were positively associated more strongly among those with negative versus positive evaluations of consequences. Those with higher acceptable drinks also had positive evaluations of consequences and were high in injunctive norms.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings supported hypotheses that norms and evaluations of alcohol consequences would interact with respect to drinking and acceptance of drinking. These examinations have practical utility and may inform development and implementation of interventions and programs targeting alcohol misuse among heavy drinking undergraduates.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptance; Alcohol; Descriptive norms; Evaluations; Injunctive norms

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25437265      PMCID: PMC4418550          DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addict Behav        ISSN: 0306-4603            Impact factor:   3.913


  28 in total

1.  Do we learn from our mistakes? An examination of the impact of negative alcohol-related consequences on college students' drinking patterns and perceptions.

Authors:  Kimberly A Mallett; Christine M Lee; Clayton Neighbors; Mary E Larimer; Rob Turrisi
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2006-03

2.  Biases in the perception of drinking norms among college students.

Authors:  J S Baer; A Stacy; M Larimer
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1991-11

3.  Secondary prevention with college drinkers: evaluation of an alcohol skills training program.

Authors:  D R Kivlahan; G A Marlatt; K Fromme; D B Coppel; E Williams
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1990-12

4.  Biases in the perceptions of the consequences of alcohol use among college students.

Authors:  J S Baer; M M Carney
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1993-01

5.  Health and behavioral consequences of binge drinking in college. A national survey of students at 140 campuses.

Authors:  H Wechsler; A Davenport; G Dowdall; B Moeykens; S Castillo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-07       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol.

Authors:  R L Collins; G A Parks; G A Marlatt
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1985-04

Review 7.  Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18-24: changes from 1998 to 2001.

Authors:  Ralph Hingson; Timothy Heeren; Michael Winter; Henry Wechsler
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 21.981

8.  Predictors of alcohol use during the first year of college: implications for prevention.

Authors:  Brian Borsari; James G Murphy; Nancy P Barnett
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Are social norms the best predictor of outcomes among heavy-drinking college students?

Authors:  Clayton Neighbors; Christine M Lee; Melissa A Lewis; Nicole Fossos; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.582

10.  The Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire: an instrument for the assessment of adolescent and adult alcohol expectancies.

Authors:  S A Brown; B A Christiansen; M S Goldman
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1987-09
View more
  3 in total

1.  Social Anxiety and Cannabis-Related Impairment: The Synergistic Influences of Peer and Parent Descriptive and Injunctive Normative Perceptions.

Authors:  Dawn W Foster; Lorra Garey; Julia D Buckner; Michael J Zvolensky
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.164

2.  The associations among prior drinking consequences, subjective evaluations, and subsequent alcohol outcomes.

Authors:  Michelle J Zaso; Aesoon Park; Jueun Kim; Les A Gellis; Hoin Kwon; Stephen A Maisto
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2016-05

3.  The Effect of Descriptive Norms on Pregaming Frequency: Tests of Five Moderators.

Authors:  Jennifer E Merrill; Shannon R Kenney; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 2.164

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.