Literature DB >> 25437135

Divide and conquer: when and why leaders undermine the cohesive fabric of their group.

Charleen R Case1, Jon K Maner1.   

Abstract

Cohesion, cooperation, and the formation of positive bonds among group members are key processes that facilitate effective group functioning. Consequently, group leaders usually work to enhance the positive social bonds among group members to facilitate cooperation and group cohesion. The present research suggests, however, that leaders sometimes are motivated to generate divisions--not cooperation--among their subordinates. Although such divisions may undermine group functioning, they can also serve as a means of protecting the leader's own power. Four experiments supported the hypothesis that, when they perceive their power to be threatened, leaders create divisions among their subordinates in order to protect their power and reduce threats posed by potential alliances among those subordinates. Leaders restricted the amount of communication among subordinates (Experiment 1), physically sequestered subordinates (Experiment 2), and prevented subordinates from bonding with one another interpersonally (Experiments 3 and 4). Those behaviors were observed only among dominance-motivated leaders (not prestige-motivated leaders), and were directed only toward highly skilled (and thus highly threatening) subordinates. Consistent with the hypothesis that leaders' behavior was driven by a desire to protect their power, the tendency to prevent in-group bonding was eliminated when leaders were assured that their power could not be lost (Experiment 4). These results shed light on factors that may undermine positive social processes within groups.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25437135     DOI: 10.1037/a0038201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  8 in total

1.  Hierarchy stability moderates the effect of status on stress and performance in humans.

Authors:  Erik L Knight; Pranjal H Mehta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Neuroendocrine and cardiovascular responses to shifting status.

Authors:  Daan Scheepers; Erik L Knight
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-07-25

3.  People with disagreeable personalities (selfish, combative, and manipulative) do not have an advantage in pursuing power at work.

Authors:  Cameron Anderson; Daron L Sharps; Christopher J Soto; Oliver P John
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men's aggressive responses to low situational power.

Authors:  Nickola C Overall; Matthew D Hammond; James K McNulty; Eli J Finkel
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-08

Review 5.  Status, Power, and Intergroup Relations: The Personal Is the Societal.

Authors:  Susan T Fiske; Cydney H Dupree; Gandalf Nicolas; Jillian K Swencionis
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2016-10

6.  Determinants of physician networks: an ethnographic study examining the processes that inform patterns of collaboration and referral decision-making among physicians.

Authors:  Patrick Kierkegaard; Jason Owen-Smith
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Two Routes to Status, One Route to Health: Trait Dominance and Prestige Differentially Associate with Self-reported Stress and Health in Two US University Populations.

Authors:  Erik L Knight
Journal:  Adapt Human Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-08-23

8.  Costs and benefits of provocation in bacterial warfare.

Authors:  Diego Gonzalez; Akshay Sabnis; Kevin R Foster; Despoina A I Mavridou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.