Paul M Foreman1, Philipp Hendrix2, Christoph J Griessenauer1, Philip G R Schmalz1, Mark R Harrigan3. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA. Electronic address: mharrigan@uabmc.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is a common neurosurgical procedure performed in both the intensive care unit (ICU) and operating room (OR). The optimal setting for EVD placement in regard to safety and accuracy of placement is poorly defined. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 150 consecutive patients who underwent EVD placement at a tertiary care center from January of 2013 to February of 2014. Clinical and radiographic data were obtained and used to compare safety and accuracy of placement between EVDs placed in the ICU versus OR. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty eight patients were evaluated. Complications (hemorrhage, infection, non-functional drain) occurred in 21.5% of ICU placements and 6.7% of OR placements (p = 0.028). Grade 1, 2, and 3 placements occurred in 67.7%, 25.8%, and 6.5% of ICU placements, respectively, versus 55.6%, 42.2%, and 2.2% of OR placements (p = 0.258). No patient who received pre-placement antibiotics suffered a ventriculostomy associated infection (VAI). CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent ventriculostomy placement in the ICU differed in important ways (i.e. indication for placement and the administration of pre-procedure prophylactic antibiotics) from patients treated in the OR. However, the available data suggests that complications of hemorrhage, infection, and non-functional drains may be mitigated by ventriculostomy placement in the OR.
OBJECTIVE: External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is a common neurosurgical procedure performed in both the intensive care unit (ICU) and operating room (OR). The optimal setting for EVD placement in regard to safety and accuracy of placement is poorly defined. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on 150 consecutive patients who underwent EVD placement at a tertiary care center from January of 2013 to February of 2014. Clinical and radiographic data were obtained and used to compare safety and accuracy of placement between EVDs placed in the ICU versus OR. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty eight patients were evaluated. Complications (hemorrhage, infection, non-functional drain) occurred in 21.5% of ICU placements and 6.7% of OR placements (p = 0.028). Grade 1, 2, and 3 placements occurred in 67.7%, 25.8%, and 6.5% of ICU placements, respectively, versus 55.6%, 42.2%, and 2.2% of OR placements (p = 0.258). No patient who received pre-placement antibiotics suffered a ventriculostomy associated infection (VAI). CONCLUSION:Patients who underwent ventriculostomy placement in the ICU differed in important ways (i.e. indication for placement and the administration of pre-procedure prophylactic antibiotics) from patients treated in the OR. However, the available data suggests that complications of hemorrhage, infection, and non-functional drains may be mitigated by ventriculostomy placement in the OR.
Authors: Achim Müller; W Andrew Mould; W David Freeman; Nichol McBee; Karen Lane; Rachel Dlugash; Rick Thompson; Saman Nekoovaght-Tak; Vikram Madan; Hasan Ali; Agnieszka Stadnik; Issam Awad; Daniel Hanley; Wendy C Ziai Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Alejandro Enriquez-Marulanda; Luis C Ascanio; Mohamed M Salem; Georgios A Maragkos; Ray Jhun; Abdulrahman Y Alturki; Justin M Moore; Christopher S Ogilvy; Ajith J Thomas Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Jack M Leschke; Andrew Lozen; Mayank Kaushal; Akinwunmi Oni-Orisan; Mazen Noufal; Osama Zaidat; Glen A Pollock; Wade M Mueller Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Bujung Hong; Anani Apedjinou; Hans E Heissler; Hind Chaib; Josef M Lang; Shadi Al-Afif; Joachim K Krauss Journal: Acta Neurochir (Wien) Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 2.216
Authors: Herbert I Fried; Barnett R Nathan; A Shaun Rowe; Joseph M Zabramski; Norberto Andaluz; Adarsh Bhimraj; Mary McKenna Guanci; David B Seder; Jeffrey M Singh Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.210