Literature DB >> 25435752

Introduction of lens-angle reconstruction surgery in rabbit eyes.

Min Hee Kim1, Ho Sik Hwang2, Kyoung Jin Park3, Je Hyung Hwang4, Choun Ki Joo1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study, we examined the stability of the lens-angle supporter (LAS) for accommodation restoration by comparing intraocular lens (IOL) location, after-cataract and ciliary body damage after cataract surgery in rabbits.
METHODS: Eight rabbits were divided into experimental and control groups of four rabbits each. Phacoemulsification and irrigation and aspiration were performed in all rabbits. This was followed by an LAS and IOL insertion in the four experimental rabbits. In the four control rabbits, only an IOL insertion was performed. Six months after the surgery, the location of the IOL, the conditions of the lens capsule and ciliary body were evaluated using a slitl-amp examination and Miyake-Apple view.
RESULTS: For the experimental group, the ultrasound biomicroscope results showed normal LAS and IOL positioning in all four cases. According to the slitlamp examination and Miyake-Apple view, the IOL was positioned at the center, with less after-cataract and damage to the ciliary body. For the control group, ultrasound biomicroscope results indicated a higher IOL position than normal, as well as a single case of IOL decentering. According to the slit-lamp examination and Miyake-Apple view, the IOL was decentered with more severe after-cataract and ciliary body damage.
CONCLUSIONS: The LAS has the potential to maintain a stable IOL position while producing less after-cataract when used in lens-angle reconstruction for correction of presbyopia. Moreover, LAS implantation incurs less damage to the ciliary body.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accommodation; Cataract surgery; Presbyopia

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25435752      PMCID: PMC4239468          DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2014.28.6.486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1011-8942


  10 in total

Review 1.  Accommodation and presbyopia: the ciliary neuromuscular view.

Authors:  Mary Ann Croft; Paul L Kaufman
Journal:  Ophthalmol Clin North Am       Date:  2006-03

Review 2.  The mechanism of accommodation and presbyopia.

Authors:  Ronald A Schachar
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  2006

3.  Miyake-Apple posterior video analysis/photographic technique.

Authors:  Frederico A S Pereira; Liliana Werner; E John Milverton; Minas T Coroneo
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  [Accommodation and presbyopia : part 1: physiology of accommodation and development of presbyopia].

Authors:  M Baumeister; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 5.  [Accommodative intraocular lenses--principles of clinical evaluation and current results].

Authors:  O K Klaproth; C Titke; M Baumeister; T Kohnen
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 0.700

6.  Quantitative ultrasound biomicroscopy study of biometry of the lens and anterior chamber.

Authors:  Ilhami Salcan; Umit Aykan; Ozlem Yildirim; Arzu Kanik
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.597

7.  Preoperative and postoperative size and movements of the lens capsular bag: ultrasound biomicroscopy analysis.

Authors:  Marina Modesti; Giacomo Pasqualitto; Rossella Appolloni; Irene Pecorella; Philippe Sourdille
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept.

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; Joshua Ben-nun; José L Rodríguez-Prats; Ana B Plaza
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity function after accommodative and multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Cem Mesci; Hasan Erbil; Levent Ozdoker; Yucel Karakurt; Ayse Dolar Bilge
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.597

10.  Functional assessment of two different accommodative intraocular lenses compared with a monofocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Giorgio Marchini; Paolo Mora; Emilio Pedrotti; Francesca Manzotti; Raffaella Aldigeri; Stefano A Gandolfi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 12.079

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.