Literature DB >> 25434069

Are health nudges coercive?

Muireann Quigley.   

Abstract

Governments and policy-makers have of late displayed renewed attention to behavioural research in an attempt to achieve a range of policy goals, including health promotion. In particular, approaches which could be labelled as 'nudges' have gained traction with policy-makers. A range of objections to nudging have been raised in the literature. These include claims that nudges undermine autonomy and liberty, may lead to a decrease in responsibility in decision-making, lack transparency, involve deception, and involve manipulation, potentially occasioning coercion. In this article I focus on claims of coercion, examining nudges within two of the main approaches to coercion-the pressure approach and the more recent enforcement approach. I argue that coercion entails an element of control over the behaviour of agents which is not plausibly displayed by the kinds of serious examples of nudges posited in the literature.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25434069     DOI: 10.1007/s40592-014-0008-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev        ISSN: 1321-2753


  10 in total

1.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Against autonomy: justifying coercive paternalism.

Authors:  Sarah Conly
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Payment for research participation: a coercive offer?

Authors:  A Wertheimer; F G Miller
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  The concept of voluntary consent.

Authors:  Robert M Nelson; Tom Beauchamp; Victoria A Miller; William Reynolds; Richard F Ittenbach; Mary Frances Luce
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Salvaging the concept of nudge.

Authors:  Yashar Saghai
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

Authors:  A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Framing of information: its influence upon decisions of doctors and patients.

Authors:  T M Marteau
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  1989-03

8.  Framing effect debiasing in medical decision making.

Authors:  Sammy Almashat; Brian Ayotte; Barry Edelstein; Jennifer Margrett
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-12-27

9.  Opt-out organ donation: on evidence and public policy.

Authors:  Brian H Willis; Muireann Quigley
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Nudging for health: on public policy and designing choice architecture.

Authors:  Muireann Quigley
Journal:  Med Law Rev       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 1.267

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Nudges and coercion: conceptual, empirical, and normative considerations.

Authors:  Kelso Cratsley
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015 Jun-Sep

2.  On Power and Freedom: Extending the Definition of Coercion.

Authors:  Sonia M Goltz
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2020-01-06

3.  Childhood Vaccination Mandates: Scope, Sanctions, Severity, Selectivity, and Salience.

Authors:  Katie Attwell; Mark C Navin
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Resisting Moralisation in Health Promotion.

Authors:  Rebecca C H Brown
Journal:  Ethical Theory Moral Pract       Date:  2018-11-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.