Literature DB >> 25432801

Transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to potassium starvation.

Ida G Anemaet, G Paul H van Heusden1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ion homeostasis is essential for every cell and aberrant cation homeostasis is related to diseases like Alzheimer's disease and epilepsy. The mechanisms responsible for cation homeostasis are only partly understood. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an excellent organism to study fundamental aspects of cation homeostasis. In this study we investigated the transcriptional response of this yeast to potassium starvation by using Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE)-tag sequencing.
RESULTS: Comparison of transcript levels in cells grown for 60 min in media without potassium with those in cells grown under standard potassium concentrations showed that the mRNA levels of 105 genes were significantly (P < 0.01) up-regulated more than 2.0-fold during potassium starvation and the mRNA levels of 172 genes significantly down-regulated. These genes belong to several functional categories. Genes involved in stress response including HSP30, YRO2 and TPO2 and phosphate metabolism including PHO84, PHO5 and SPL2 were highly up-regulated. Analysis of the promoter of PHO84 encoding a high affinity phosphate transporter, revealed that increased PHO84 RNA levels are caused by both increased Pho4-dependent transcription and decreased RNA turnover. In the latter process antisense transcription may be involved. Many genes involved in cell cycle control, and to a lesser extent genes involved in amino acid transport, were strongly down-regulated.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that yeast cells respond to potassium starvation in a complex way and reveals a direct link between potassium homeostasis and phosphate metabolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25432801      PMCID: PMC4289377          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


Background

Cation homeostasis is an indispensable process for every living cell. The intracellular concentration of H+, K+ and Na+ cations must be tightly regulated because H+ and K+ are involved in important processes and activities of many cellular systems. On the other hand, extreme Na+ concentrations are toxic for cells. Aberrant cellular cation homeostasis is related to human neurological diseases like Alzheimer’s disease [1, 2] and epilepsy [3]. Furthermore, cation homeostasis is critically important for apoptosis [4] and aberrant serum potassium levels are related to diseases like hypo- and hyperkalemia and Crohn's disease. Properties of ion homeostasis in plants determine their ability to grow in environments with very low or high concentrations of salts (for review see: [5]). The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an excellent model organism to study cation homeostasis (for reviews see: [6-8]). In this yeast intracellular potassium concentration is relatively stable at 200 – 300 mM. On the other hand, the intracellular Na+ concentration is an order of magnitude lower, around 20 mM. Maintenance of high intracellular concentrations of potassium is facilitated by the generation of a membrane potential by the proton ATPase Pma1 [9] and two high affinity potassium transporters Trk1 and Trk2 [10, 11]. Sodium ions are mainly extruded by the Ena1-5 ATP-dependent sodium-potassium transporters [12, 13]. Potassium is extruded from the cells by the Nha1 and Tok1 transporters [14, 15]. The activity of these transporters is highly regulated by several protein kinases and protein phosphatases and by protein turnover. Regulation of ion homeostasis at the transcriptional level is less well understood. Genome-wide studies mainly addressed the transcriptional response to high sodium- or potassium levels rather than the response to cation starvation conditions [16-19]. To further understand cation homeostasis in S. cerevisiae a number of European research groups including ours collaborate in the Translucent consortium [8]. To allow studies on the response of yeast to different concentrations of potassium, a new YNB medium containing negligible concentrations of alkali metal cations has been developed by the consortium [20]. In a recent study this medium was used to study the short-term response to potassium starvation at the transcriptional level using DNA microarrays [21]. This study showed that the lack of potassium drastically activates sulfur metabolism (mainly methionine and cysteine metabolism), triggers an oxidative stress response and activate the retrograde pathway. The expression of genes encoding ribosomal proteins and proteins involved in the cell cycle was considerably lowered. In this study, we investigated the transcriptional response to potassium starvation using Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE)-tag sequencing. The expression of genes involved in several cellular processes was shown to be affected during potassium starvation including genes encoding proteins involved in stress response and phosphate metabolism. The effect of potassium starvation on the expression of PHO84 encoding an high affinity phosphate transporter was shown to be caused by an activation of the PHO84 promoter through the Pho4 transcription factor as well as at the level of RNA turnover.

Results

Transcriptome analysis by SAGE tag sequencing

To further understand the mechanisms of ion homeostasis we analyzed the effects of potassium starvation on the genome-wide transcription in S. cerevisiae. In our studies we used the Translucent YNB medium containing very low concentrations of alkali metal cations, allowing controlled addition of potassium. Exponential growing cells in four independent cultures were transferred to medium containing 50 mM KCl or lacking KCl and grown for 60 min. RNA was isolated for transcriptome analysis. Recent technological developments made RNA sequencing the method of choice over analysis using DNA microarrays for such studies. We used SAGE tag sequencing allowing accurate quantification of RNA levels. The SAGE tags were aligned to a virtual tag library corresponding to all S. cerevisiae annotated open reading frames (http://www.yeastgenome.org) including 200 bp downstream sequences. In this way, transcriptional information was obtained for 6053 loci [see Additional file 1]. Comparison of transcript levels isolated from cells grown in media without potassium with those isolated from cells grown under standard potassium concentrations showed that the mRNA levels of 105 genes were significantly (P < 0.01) up-regulated more than 2.0-fold during potassium starvation and the mRNA levels of 172 genes significantly down-regulated. The 25 most up-regulated genes are shown in Table 1, the 25 most down-regulated genes in Table 2. Classification according to GO-term biological process using FunSpec [22] of the genes up-regulated at least 2-fold (P < 0.01) showed that the up-regulated genes belong to many different categories and that especially genes involved in phosphate metabolism, cytogamy and stress response are enriched in this set of genes (Table 3). In addition, genes involved carbohydrate metabolism are affected and genes subject to glucose repression like HXK1 are induced. Classification of the genes down-regulated at least 2-fold (P < 0.01) by potassium starvation shows a very clear enrichment of genes involved in cell cycle-related processes. In addition genes involved in ammonia assimilation and amino acid transport are enriched in this set of genes (Table 4).
Table 1

The 25 most up-regulated genes after 60 min of potassium starvation (P < 0.01)

AnnotationDescriptionRNA level 50 mM (reads per million) (± SD; n = 4)RNA level 0 mM (reads per million) (± SD; n = 4)Fold-change (0 mM/ 50 mM)P-value
SSN8 Cyclin-like component of the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme5.2 ± 2.571 ± 2013.70.001
YER138W-A Putative protein of unknown function2.3 ± 2.329 ± 1312.40.007
CIT3 Dual specificity mitochondrial citrate and methylcitrate synthase6.6 ± 3.275 ± 2611.40.002
HSP82 Hsp90 chaperone; redundant in function with Hsc82p175 ± 521845 ± 33310.60.000
PDC5 Minor isoform of pyruvate decarboxylase21 ± 6219 ± 4310.50.000
PHO84 High-affinity inorganic phosphate (Pi) transporter50 ± 27516 ± 21410.30.005
YBR085C-A Protein of unknown function46 ± 19443 ± 1809.60.005
YGR161W-C Putative protein of unknown function7.6 ± 3.472 ± 269.50.002
YIL082W-A Retrotransposon TYA Gag and TYB Pol genes1.2 ± 0.59.8 ± 2.78.10.001
SPL2 Protein with similarity to cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors31 ± 5224 ± 707.30.001
MCM10 Essential chromatin-associated protein2.1 ± 0.614 ± 46.90.001
HSP104 Disaggregase107 ± 50718 ± 2876.70.006
IES5 Protein that associates with the Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex31 ± 10186 ± 666.10.003
PHM6 Protein of unknown function11 ± 666 ± 255.90.005
YNL146W Putative protein of unknown function3.2 ± 1.619 ± 65.80.003
HSP42 Small heat shock protein with chaperone activity57 ± 25331 ± 955.80.001
ECL1 Protein of unknown function99 ± 49549 ± 1695.50.002
STI1 Hsp90 cochaperone157 ± 51805 ± 2305.10.002
ARE2 Acyl-CoA:sterol acyltransferase4.7 ± 1.224 ± 105.10.010
HXK1 Hexokinase isoenzyme 1202 ± 701027 ± 3735.10.005
FUS1 Membrane protein localized to the shmoo tip22 ± 13107 ± 324.90.002
SSA3 ATPase involved in protein folding and the response to stress7.2 ± 1.835 ± 154.90.010
ESC2 Sumo-like domain protein2.4 ± 1.211 ± 54.80.009
MET28 bZIP transcriptional activator in the Cbf1p-Met4p-Met28p complex11 ± 451 ± 204.80.008
YBL005W-B Retrotransposon TYA Gag and TYB Pol genes1495 ± 7147106 ± 19424.70.002
Table 2

The 25 most down-regulated genes after 60 min of potassium starvation (P < 0.01)

AnnotationDescriptionRNA level 50 mM (reads per million) (± SD; n = 4)RNA level 0 mM (reads per million) (± SD; n = 4)Fold-change (50 mM/0 mM)P-value
YIL171W-A Dubious open reading frame0.6 ± 0.20.0 ± 0.0-0.001
RER1 Protein involved in retention of membrane proteins0.5 ± 0.20.0 ± 0.0-0.001
CLB6 B-type cyclin involved in DNA replication during S phase23 ± 100.3 ± 0.471.20.004
TOS6 Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-dependent cell wall protein395 ± 4212 ± 932.50.000
POL30 Proliferating cell nuclear antigen166 ± 465.7 ± 4.029.10.000
PCL1 Cyclin, interacts with cyclin-dependent kinase Pho85p100 ± 304.1 ± 3.424.60.001
TOS4 Putative transcription factor, contains Forkhead Associated domain54 ± 152.5 ± 2.421.30.001
KCC4 Protein kinase of the bud neck involved in the septin checkpoint42 ± 142.1 ± 1.420.30.001
YMR230W-A Putative protein of unknown function23 ± 111.1 ± 1.020.10.007
YOX1 Homeobox transcriptional repressor71 ± 214.1 ± 3.117.20.001
HTA1 Histone H2A1248 ± 39274 ± 3117.00.001
CDC45 DNA replication initiation factor27 ± 91.9 ± 1.314.10.002
SWE1 Protein kinase that regulates the G2/M transition81 ± 356.8 ± 4.711.90.006
CDC21 Thymidylate synthase98 ± 348.3 ± 5.911.80.002
ALG14 Component of UDP-GlcNAc transferase76 ± 266.7 ± 4.611.40.002
YIG1 Protein that interacts with glycerol 3-phosphatase1.5 ± 0.50.1 ± 0.310.70.003
MCD1 Essential alpha-kleisin subunit of the cohesin complex87 ± 308.4 ± 5.210.40.002
RPL18B Ribosomal 60S subunit protein L18B774 ± 13275 ± 1310.40.000
LSM4 Lsm (Like Sm) protein0.9 ± 0.20.1 ± 0.210.20.001
GAP1 General amino acid permease146 ± 1815 ± 69.60.000
YER088C-A Dubious open reading frame24 ± 52.6 ± 1.89.40.000
YLR413W Putative protein of unknown function207 ± 5822 ± 119.40.001
TOS2 Protein involved in localization of Cdc24p to the site of bud growth16 ± 11.7 ± 1.59.20.000
PMI40 Mannose-6-phosphate isomerase361 ± 9640 ± 299.10.001
KIP1 Kinesin-related motor protein21 ± 72.3 ± 1.68.90.002
Table 3

Functional analysis using FunSpec [22] of genes up-regulated at least 2-fold (P < 0.01) during potassium starvation

Categoryp-value (x10 −3 )In category from clusterk a f a
polyphosphate metabolic process [GO:0006797]0.19 VTC2 VTC4 PHO84 38
cytogamy [GO:0000755]0.19 FUS1 FIG 2 STE2 38
response to stress [GO:0006950]0. 52 SSA3 HSP26 AAD4 HSP42 MDJ1 POG1 HSP104 STI1 HSP82 9152
budding cell bud growth [GO:0007117]2.46 ROM1 NAP1 REH1 318
carbohydrate metabolic process [GO:0005975]3.18 GLC3 HXK1 PGM3 GLC8 ZWF1 SOL1 694
'de novo' protein folding [GO:0006458]3.40 MDJ1 HSP82 26
biological_process unknown [GO:0008150]3.70 EDS1 YBR053C YBR085C-A PCS60 RTN2 PHM6 IES5 YER138W-A TMT1 YGR127W ECL1 YGR161W-C HUA1 AIM17 YIL102C-A IKS1 YJL127C-B YKL023W TTI1 YKR075C YLR149C YLR271W CMC4 PGM3 YNL058C YNL146W YNR014W AIM41 YOR289W UIP4 301203
NADPH regeneration [GO:0006740]4.72 IDP3 ZWF1 27
cell adhesion [GO:0007155]4.72 FIG 2 SAG1 27
glucose metabolic process [GO:0006006]5.06 HXK1 PGM3 ZWF1 323
branched chain family amino acid catabolic process [GO:0009083]7.93 BAT2 PDC5 29
re-entry into mitotic cell cycle after pheromone arrest [GO:0000321]7.93 FAR7 POG1 29
vacuole fusion, non-autophagic [GO:0042144]9.77 SWF1 VTC2 VTC4 329
deadenylation-dependent decapping of nuclear-transcribed mRNA [GO:0000290]9.81 EDC2 DCS2 210
microautophagy [GO:0016237]9.81 VTC2 VTC4 210

a, k: number of genes from the input cluster in given category; f: number of genes total in given category.

Table 4

Functional analysis using FunSpec [22] of genes down-regulated at least 2-fold (P < 0.01) during potassium starvation

Categoryp-value (x10 −3 )In category from clusterk a f a
cell division [GO:0051301]0.007 LTE1 KIP1 HSL7 KCC4 MCD1 UBC9 PDS1 SPC25 CLB1 CLB6 SWE1 PCL1 SGO1 NUD1 CLN2 CLB5 KAR3 17190
regulation of cyclin-dependent protein kinase activity [GO:0000079]0.008 CLB1 CLB6 SWE1 PCL1 CLN2 CLB5 620
cell cycle [GO:0007049]0.019 LTE1 KIP1 HSL7 KCC4 MCD1 PSA1 UBC9 PDS1 SPC25 CLB1 CLB6 SWE1 SLD2 CDC45 YOX1 TOF1 PCL1 SGO1 NUD1 CLN2 CLB5 KAR3 22316
mitosis [GO:0007067]0.15 LTE1 KIP1 HSL7 MCD1 UBC9 PDS1 SPC25 CLB1 SWE1 SGO1 NUD1 KAR3 12132
ammonia assimilation cycle [GO:0019676]0.16 GAP1 PUT4 GDH1 35
amino acid transmembrane transport [GO:0003333]0.31 GNP1 HNM1 GAP1 BIO5 PUT4 524
double-strand break repair via break-induced replication [GO:0000727]0.46 RDH54 SLD5 SLD2 CDC45 CTF4 526
DNA replication [GO:0006260]0.66 POL12 POL30 SLD5 SLD2 CDC45 TOF1 RFA2 CTF4 875
G2/M transition of mitotic cell cycle [GO:0000086]0.67 HSL7 UBC9 CLB1 SWE1 CLB5 528
positive regulation of DNA replication [GO:0045740]0.67 CLB6 CLB5 22
GDP-mannose biosynthetic process [GO:0009298]0.67 PSA1 PMI40 22
meiotic mismatch repair [GO:0000710]0.87 POL30 MSH6 PMS1 38
budding cell bud growth [GO:0007117]1.00 KCC4 GIN4 TOS2 DFG5 418
'de novo' IMP biosynthetic process [GO:0006189]1.28 ADE17 ADE4 ADE2 39
microtubule nucleation [GO:0007020]1.84 SPC25 SPC97 STU2 SPC98 421
gamma-aminobutyric acid transport [GO:0015812]1.97 GAP1 PUT4 23
regulation of S phase of mitotic cell cycle [GO:0007090]1.97 CLB6 CLB5 23
mitotic sister chromatid cohesion [GO:0007064]3.08 POL30 TOF1 CTF4 KAR3 424
cell wall mannoprotein biosynthetic process [GO:0000032]3.16 PSA1 PMI40 KTR1 312
glycine metabolic process [GO:0006544]3.87 SHM2 GCV2 24
septin checkpoint [GO:0000135]3.87 KCC4 GIN4 24
amino acid transport [GO:0006865]4.30 GNP1 HNM1 GAP1 BIO5 PUT4 542
response to DNA damage stimulus [GO:0006974]4.92 RDH54 POL30 MCD1 DUN1 MSH6 HTA1 SRS2 TOS4 OGG1 PMS1 TOF1 SMC5 12197
telomere maintenance via telomerase [GO:0007004]6.17 EST1 RAP1 RFA2 315
DNA repair [GO:0006281]7.71 RDH54 POL30 MSH6 HTA1 SRS2 OGG1 PMS1 TOF1 RFA2 SMC5 CTF4 11183
negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter, global [GO:0045816]9.34 HTB1 HTA1 26
regulation of mitotic cell cycle [GO:0007346]9.34 SMI1 YOX1 26
premeiotic DNA replication [GO:0006279]9.34 CLB6 CLB5 26
replication fork protection [GO:0048478]9.34 DUN1 TOF1 26

a, k: number of genes from the input cluster in given category; f: number of genes total in given category.

The 25 most up-regulated genes after 60 min of potassium starvation (P < 0.01) The 25 most down-regulated genes after 60 min of potassium starvation (P < 0.01) Functional analysis using FunSpec [22] of genes up-regulated at least 2-fold (P < 0.01) during potassium starvation a, k: number of genes from the input cluster in given category; f: number of genes total in given category. Functional analysis using FunSpec [22] of genes down-regulated at least 2-fold (P < 0.01) during potassium starvation a, k: number of genes from the input cluster in given category; f: number of genes total in given category. Our SAGE-tag sequencing showed that the stress response genes HSP30, TPO2 and YRO2 were highly up-regulated upon potassium starvation, but due to the variation in expression in the individual cultures the effect did not meet our criteria for significance, i.e. P < 0.01. By real time qRT-PCR we verified the effects of potassium starvation on these genes, using ACT1 as control. As shown in Table 5 qRT-PCR clearly showed that HSP30, TPO2 and YRO2 were strongly up-regulated upon potassium starvation in agreement with the RNAseq data. As an additional control we verified the expression of GAP1 and ALG9 by qRT-PCR. Both by RNAseq and qRT-PCR we showed that GAP1 was strongly down-regulated whereas the control gene ALG9[23] was only slightly affected by potassium starvation (Table 5).
Table 5

Analysis of the effect of potassium starvation by qRT-PCR

GeneFold change qRT-PCRFold change RNAseq
Experiment 1Experiment 2
TPO2 4.55.14.6 (P = 0.025)
HSP30 11.118.019.7 (P = 0.011)
YRO2 10.440.923.1 (P = 0.075)
GAP1 - 12.9a - 23.7−9.6 (P < 0.001)
ALG9 1.21.7−1.25

a, down-regulation is indicated with ‘-‘.

Analysis of the effect of potassium starvation by qRT-PCR a, down-regulation is indicated with ‘-‘.

Growth of selected deletion strains at low potassium concentrations

An obvious question is whether the up-regulated genes are required for growth at low potassium concentrations. To this end strains deleted for the most up-regulated genes or deleted for PHO4 (encoding a transcription factor regulating the expression of genes involved in phosphate metabolism, see below) were spotted on plates with 50 or 0.5 mM KCl. The trk1trk2 double disruptant, lacking the high affinity potassium transporters Trk1 and Trk2, was used as a control. None of the selected disruptants (Δssn8, Δcit3, Δhsp82, Δpdc5, Δpho84, Δspl2, Δhsp104, Δies5, Δpho4) showed an aberrant growth at 0.5 mM KCl, whereas the trk1trk2 mutant (BYT12) did not grow at this KCl concentration (Figure 1). These results indicate that the most up-regulated genes are not by themselves required for growth at low potassium concentrations. To study the survival of the tested disruption strains at low potassium conditions, these strains were spotted on a plate lacking potassium and after six days the cells were transferred to plates with 50 mM KCl. No significant differences in growth compared to the wild type strain were observed, except for the trk1 trk2 strain (data not shown).
Figure 1

Growth at 50 and 0.5 mM KCl of deletion strains lacking genes highly up-regulated during potassium starvation or lacking . Ten-fold serial dilutions of the indicated strains are spotted on Translucent YNB plates supplemented with histidine, methionine, leucine and uracil containing 50 or 0.5 mM KCl. Plates were incubated for 3 days at 30°C.

Growth at 50 and 0.5 mM KCl of deletion strains lacking genes highly up-regulated during potassium starvation or lacking . Ten-fold serial dilutions of the indicated strains are spotted on Translucent YNB plates supplemented with histidine, methionine, leucine and uracil containing 50 or 0.5 mM KCl. Plates were incubated for 3 days at 30°C.

Promoter analysis

Using the information available in the Yeastract database (http://www.yeastract.com) it became clear that many different transcription factors are associated with the up-regulated genes. This suggests that the transcriptional response to potassium starvation is not linked to the activation of a single transcription factor. Two of the up-regulated genes related to stress-response, i.e. YRO2 and TPO2, are also up-regulated upon weak acid stress [24]. The latter up-regulation is dependent on the transcription factor Haa1. However, in a Δhaa1 mutant YRO2 is still highly up-regulated upon potassium starvation (RM Läkamp and GPH van Heusden, unpublished results) making a role of Haa1 in the response to potassium starvation less likely. To further analyze the regulation of YRO2 and TPO2 the promoter sequences were placed upstream of the bacterial ß-galactosidase gene in plasmid pRUL302 and introduced in yeast strain BY4741. The resulting strains were cultivated in the presence of 50 mM KCl till mid-exponential growth, transferred to media with 50 mM KCl or to media lacking KCl and grown for 60 min. Then, cells were isolated and ß-galactosidase activity was determined. Using 510 bp of sequences of the TPO2 promoter or 2141 bp of sequences of the YRO2 promoter we found an only 1.3-fold or 2.1-fold, respectively, increase in β-galactosidase activity upon potassium starvation, whereas RNAseq showed 4.6-fold (P = 0.025) and 23-fold (P = 0.075), respectively, increase in mRNA level, suggesting that also other mechanisms than activation of the promoter are involved in the expression of YRO2 and TPO2 during potassium starvation.

Regulation of PHO84 by the transcription factor Pho4

Our RNAseq data reveal that genes involved in phosphate metabolism are well represented in the set of genes that were significantly up-regulated. Many of these genes, including PHO84, are strongly regulated in response to external phosphate concentrations (for review see: [25]). The transcription factor Pho4 translocates into the nucleus at low phosphate concentrations and plays a prominent role in activation of PHO84 expression [26]. To investigate the involvement of Pho4 in the activation of the PHO84 promoter during potassium starvation we inserted 600 bp promoter sequences upstream of the ß-galactosidase gene in plasmid pRUL302 and introduced the resulting plasmid in BY4741 and the Δpho4 disruptant in the BY4741 background (each containing the pRS313 plasmid). The resulting strains were cultivated as described above to determine the effect of potassium starvation on the PHO84 promoter. As shown in Table 6, in the wild type background (BY4741) there is a clear activation of the PHO84 promoter, whereas in the Δpho4 strain hardly any activity can be detected, both after cultivation at 50 mM and 0 mM KCl. Introduction of an intact copy of PHO4 (pRS313[PHO4]) in the wild type background gives a stimulation of the PHO84 promoter, both at 50 and 0 mM KCl. Introduction of an intact copy of PHO4 (pRS313[PHO4]) in the Δpho4 strain restores and activates the PHO84 promoter. These results indicate that the Pho4 transcription factor is required for the expression of PHO84 at low potassium concentrations.
Table 6

Role of Pho4 in the transcriptional regulation of during potassium starvation

StrainPlasmidß-galactosidase activity (arbitrary units)Fold change (0 mM/50 mM)
50 mM KCl0 mM KCl
BY4741pRS3130.130.564.1
BY4741pRS313[PHO4]2.363.341.4
Δpho4pRS3130.000.00-
Δpho4pRS313[PHO4]1.412.842.0

Results of a typical experiment are given. In each experiment two independent transformants were analyzed, the average is shown.

Role of Pho4 in the transcriptional regulation of during potassium starvation Results of a typical experiment are given. In each experiment two independent transformants were analyzed, the average is shown.

Promoter replacement

To further investigate the regulation of gene expression during potassium starvation we replaced the promoter sequences of a number of genes (HSP30, TPO2, YRO2, PHO84 and ALG9) by the CYC1 promoter. This promoter is most likely not influenced by potassium starvation as the levels of CYC1 RNA were hardly changed (1.2-fold lower levels after potassium starvation). The resulting strains were cultivated as above and RNA was isolated. Gene expression was determined by qRT-PCR using ACT1 as a reference gene. In this way we found the following effects of potassium starvation on the RNA levels: HSP30, 0.9- and 1.3-fold increase in two independent experiments; TPO2, 0.8- and 2.2-fold increase; YRO2, 5.3- and 3.5-fold decrease; PHO84, 6.8- and 8.6--fold increase; ALG9 (reference gene), 1.0- and 1.2-fold increase. These observations show that especially for PHO84 other regulatory aspects are involved besides activation of the promoter. Surprisingly, the levels of YRO2 RNA are reduced at 0 mM KCl.

Antisense transcription

Several studies have shown that PHO84 is also transcribed in the opposite direction yielding antisense RNA [27, 28]. SAGE tag sequencing is able to identify antisense transcripts [29, 30]. This is illustrated for PHO84 in Figure 2A. Alignment of the sequenced tags to the complementary strand of the S. cerevisiae open reading frames (+ 200 bp downstream sequences) reveals potential antisense transcripts corresponding to 5665 loci [see Additional file 2]. The total number of tags aligning to the complementary strand is 4 to 14 percent of the total number of tags aligning to the coding strand. Comparison of the antisense transcript levels in cells grown in medium without potassium with the levels in cells grown under standard potassium concentrations shows that antisense transcription of 34 genes was significantly (P < 0.01) up-regulated more than 2-fold, whereas antisense transcripts of 76 genes were significantly down-regulated [see Additional file 3]. Several tags aligned to the complementary strand of PHO84. Almost all tags were found at a higher level using RNA isolated from cells grown at 0 mM KCl compared to cells grown at 50 mM KCl [see Additional file 3]. The total number of tags corresponding to antisense transcripts of the PHO84 gene is 8.7-fold (P = 0.07) increased after potassium starvation.
Figure 2

Antisense transcription of . A, scheme showing the position of SAGE tags corresponding to sense and antisense transcripts. B, primers used to detect PHO84 antisense transcripts. C. Detection of antisense transcripts using strand specific cDNA synthesis and PCR. RNA was isolated from cells grown for 60 min in Translucent YNB medium lacking potassium. Arrow indicates the position of the expected PCR fragment.

Antisense transcription of . A, scheme showing the position of SAGE tags corresponding to sense and antisense transcripts. B, primers used to detect PHO84 antisense transcripts. C. Detection of antisense transcripts using strand specific cDNA synthesis and PCR. RNA was isolated from cells grown for 60 min in Translucent YNB medium lacking potassium. Arrow indicates the position of the expected PCR fragment. Antisense PHO84 transcripts were further analyzed by RT-PCR using strand specific primers. cDNA synthesis using a primer specific for antisense RNA (primer AS-cDNA, Figure 2B) yields cDNA dependent on antisense transcripts. Using primers AS-PCR-Fw and AS-PCR-Rv (Figure 2B) this cDNA can be detected by PCR. As shown in Figure 2C (lanes 3 and 4) the expected PCR fragment was found. This band was not found when primer SE-cDNA (Figure 2B, lane 5 and 6) was used as primer for cDNA synthesis, which generates cDNA corresponding to sense transcripts. These results indicate that antisense PHO84 RNA can be detected RT-PCR, in agreement with our RNAseq experiments and previous studies.

Discussion and conclusion

The yeast S. cerevisiae is an excellent organism to study fundamental aspects of cation homeostasis. Although many components involved in the maintenance of cation homeostasis in this yeast have already been revealed, still many aspects remain unclear. Understanding the response of yeast cells to potassium starvation is essential for understanding the mechanisms involved in cation homeostasis. Therefore, the Translucent consortium developed a new medium, based on the widely used YNB-medium, containing negligible amounts of alkali metal cations [20]. This medium allowed potassium starvation studies. Studies have been conducted to address effects at the transcriptional [21] and proteomic level [31]. Using DNA microarrays it was shown that the lack of potassium affects the expression of more than one thousand genes including a strong activation of genes involved in sulfur metabolism, oxidative stress response and the retrograde pathway and a reduced expression of genes involved in ribosome biogenesis and cell cycle control. At the protein level a general decrease in protein content and an increased level of stress-related proteins were found. In this study we used SAGE-tag sequencing to analyze the transcriptional response of S. cerevisiae to potassium starvation. We used four independent biological replicates and for reasons unknown the variation between these replicates is somewhat larger than expected. Despite this variation, similarly to the study with DNA microarrays we found a very pronounced effect of potassium starvation on gene expression and the expression of genes belonging to many functional categories was affected. The power of SAGE-tag sequencing is that also lowly expressed genes can be analyzed. Therefore, we were able to obtain information on the expression of 6053 different loci, much higher than what can be achieved by DNA microarrays. Both in this study and in the study with DNA microarrays a strong up-regulation of genes involved in stress response and a strong down-regulation of genes involved in various aspects of cell cycle control were found. Although the overall trend found in this and the previous study is very similar, also quantitative differences were found. One of the examples is the effect on the expression of genes involved in sulfur metabolism. In the previous study after 60 min of potassium starvation SUL2, MUP3, MET3, STR3, MET14, MET28, SER3 and MET10 were all up-regulated more than 4-fold. For these genes we also found up-regulation, although much less pronounced. The effect of potassium starvation on the S. cerevisiae transcriptome has also been investigated using chemostat cultures [32]. In that study, only a limited number of genes were strongly affected by potassium limitation, and the great majority of these were genes known to be involved in nitrogen metabolism. Genes encoding ammonium ion and amino acid transporters (MEP2 and GAP1) were down-regulated 30-fold and virtually all other nitrogen catabolite-repressed genes were strongly down-regulated as well. SPS-regulated amino acid permeases were strongly up-regulated. In our study we also found a strong down-regulation of GAP1 and MEP2 (9.6 and 7.4-fold, respectively). On the other hand, in our study genes encoding amino acid permeases were down-regulated instead of up-regulated (GNP1 5.5-fold, DIP1 2.6-fold, TAT2 1.1-fold, AGP1 9.8-fold, PTR2 3.0-fold, BAP2 3.5-fold and MUP1 1.3-fold-down-regulated, see Additional file 1). In this respect it has to be mentioned that the physiological state of yeast cells in chemostat cultures can be greatly different from that of cells in shake flask cultures and that different media were used in the two studies. Potassium homeostasis is regulated by a complex interplay between transporters and regulatory proteins. Many proteins have been identified that bind to the various S. cerevisiae ion transports [8] (http://www.yeastgenome.org). The function of most of these interactions is still unknown and a role in the regulation of the ion transporters is imaginable. In Figure 3 a number of S. cerevisiae ion transporters and their binding partners is shown and the effect of potassium starvation on their transcript levels is indicated in a color scale, with down-regulation in green and up-regulation in red. It is clear that the RNA levels of some binding partners are increased and of some binding partners decreased. For example, HSP30, encoding a Nha1 binding partner, and ARR3, encoding an Ena2 binding partners are strongly up-regulated. The RNA levels of many, but not all, of the binding partners of the Nhx1 transporter are decreased. However, the significance of these observations still has to be shown.
Figure 3

The effect of potassium starvation on the RNA level of a number of ion transporters and their binding partners. Protein binding partners (physical interactions) were taken from http://www.yeastgenome.org. Squares: ion transporters; circles: binding partners. Fold changes in RNA levels are indicated in a color scale, down-regulation in green and up-regulation in red; pink, RNAseq data not available. Protein-protein interactions are shown with blue lines. The figure was made using Cytoscape [33].

The effect of potassium starvation on the RNA level of a number of ion transporters and their binding partners. Protein binding partners (physical interactions) were taken from http://www.yeastgenome.org. Squares: ion transporters; circles: binding partners. Fold changes in RNA levels are indicated in a color scale, down-regulation in green and up-regulation in red; pink, RNAseq data not available. Protein-protein interactions are shown with blue lines. The figure was made using Cytoscape [33]. Identification of transcription factors involved in the regulation of gene expression during potassium starvation is very complex. Using the information on transcription factor associations in the Yeastract database (http://www.yeastract.com) many different transcription factors were found associated with the up- or down-regulated genes. The transcription factor Pho4 may participate in gene regulation during potassium starvation. This transcription factor is found to be associated with seven of the 25 most up-regulated genes, i.e. ARE2, FUS1, HSP104, PHM6, PHO84, SPL2 and YNL146W (http://www.yeastract.com). Deletion of PHO4 strongly affected the activity of PHO84 promoter. However, other transcription factors are most likely be involved as well. In addition, RNA turnover is important. After replacement of the PHO84 promoter by the CYC1 promoter PHO84 RNA levels are still approximately five-fold increased. In this study as well as in the study using DNA microarrays [21] a strong induction if genes involved in phosphate metabolism, including PHO84, was found. Thus, despite the presence of phosphate in the medium, these genes are not repressed, when potassium is absent. The transcription factor Pho4 plays a key role in the regulation of these genes. The subcellular localization of this transcription factor is regulated via phosphorylation by the Pho80-Pho85 cyclin-kinase complex [26]. When phosphate is available Pho4 is retained in the cytoplasm, whereas under phosphate limiting conditions it translocates into the nucleus, resulting in expression of genes involved in phosphate uptake. During potassium starvation we observed an increase in nuclear Pho4-GFP (data not shown). The expression of PHO4, PHO80 and PHO85 is only slightly and not significantly affected by potassium starvation (1.14-, 0.58- and 0.94-fold, respectively) [see Additional file 1], suggesting that transcriptional regulation of these genes does not play a role. However, the mechanism of the regulation of Pho4 during potassium starvation still has to be revealed. Several studies have shown that PHO84 is also transcribed in the opposite direction yielding antisense RNA [27, 28]. This antisense RNA induces transcriptional silencing of PHO84 via histone deacetylation of the PHO84 promoter when phosphate is available. Our SAGE tag sequencing revealed many tags corresponding to antisense transcripts corresponding to 5665 loci [see Additional file 2] and the levels of many of these tags were affected by potassium starvation, including those of PHO84 [see Additional files 2 and 3]. By applying SAGE tag sequencing, tags corresponding to antisense transcripts were also found in other studies [29, 30]. However, it has been suggested that spurious synthesis of second-strand cDNA during reverse transcription reactions triggers antisense artifacts [34]. In our studies we performed cDNA synthesis on-the-bead making the formation of artifacts less likely [30]. Furthermore, several studies showed the widespread occurrence of antisense transcription in S. cerevisiae (eg. [35, 36]). By RT-PCR using antisense-specific primers during cDNA synthesis we were able to provide additional evidence for antisense transcription of PHO84 (Figure 2). However, the role of antisense transcription in the regulation of PHO84 during potassium starvation still has to be disclosed.

Methods

Yeast strains and growth conditions

In this study the yeast strain BY4741 and strains derived from BY4741 were used, as listed in Table 7. For analysis of growth at low potassium concentrations also a number of homozygous diploid deletion strains in the BY4743 background were used, obtained from Euroscarf (Frankfurt, Germany). Yeast was grown in YPD medium or selective MY medium supplemented, if required, with histidine, leucine, methionine and/or uracil to a final concentration of 20 mg/L [37]. For cultivation at defined potassium concentrations YNB medium containing very low concentrations of alkali metal cations, developed by the Translucent consortium, was used [20]. Yeast transformations were performed using the LiAc method [38]. Yeast strains carrying plasmids were obtained by transforming parental strains with the appropriate plasmids followed by selection for histidine, and/or uracil prototrophy.
Table 7

Yeast strains used in this study

Yeast strainGenotypeSource/Reference
BY4741 MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 Euroscarf, Germany
PCYC1:: PHO84 (GG3425) MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 PCYC1::PHO84 (KAN.MX)This study
PCYC1:: YRO2 (GG3424) MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 PCYC1::YRO2 (KAN.MX)This study
PCYC1:: TPO2 (GG3423) MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 PCYC1::TPO2 (KAN.MX)This study
PCYC1:: HSP30 (GG3422) MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 PCYC1:: HSP30 (KAN.MX)This study
PCYC1:: ALG9 (GG3426) MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 PCYC1::ALG9 (KAN.MX)This study
BYT12 MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 trk1Δ::loxP trk2Δ::loxP Hana Sychrova, Prague [39]
Δpho4 MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0 pho4Δ::KAN.MXEuroscarf, Germany
Yeast strains used in this study

Replacement of promoters by the CYC1 promoter

To replace the endogenous promoters of YRO2, HSP30, TPO2, PHO84 or ALG9 by the CYC1 promoter a DNA fragment was generated by PCR on plasmid pYM-N10 [40] using the primer combinations YRO2-Fw-prom/YRO2-Rev-CYC1, HSP30-Fw-prom/HSP30-Rev-CYC1, TPO2-Fw-prom/TPO2-Rev-CYC1, PHO84-Fw-prom/PHO84-Rev-CYC1 or ALG9-Fw-prom/ALG9-Rev-CYC1, respectively. The primer sequences are shown in Table 8. These DNA fragments were used to transform BY4741 and transformants were selected on YPD plates containing 150 μg/ml G418. Correct integration was verified by PCR.
Table 8

Primers used in this study

PrimerSequence (5’ – 3’)
YRO2-Fw-promTTTACGAAAAGTGTCTAGTTGCTCAATGCATATAAACTTAATCTA GCTTCGTACGCTGCAGGTCG
YRO2-Rev-CYC1GGCTTCGTTACCACCTCTTTTCAATAGTTCAACATAATCAGACATTTAGTGTGTGTATTTGTGTTTGC
HSP30-Fw-promCCTTGCGTCTCCCTGCGCGATTTTGTTGGCCATTTTCCAGATCCT GCTTCGTACGCTGCAGGTCG
HSP30-Rev-CYC1TAAAGCCTCGTTACGATTTAAAAAGCTTGATAGCGTATCGTTCAT TTAGTGTGTGTATTTGTGTTTGC
TPO2-Fw-promACCGATTTCTCGAGATGATTCCATAGCCGTTAAATTCATCTCAAA GCTTCGTACGCTGCAGGTCG
TPO2-Rev-CYC1AGTGTTTTGTGAGTTGAATGAAACAACAGATTCTTGATCACTCATTTAGTGTGTGTATTTGTGTTTGC
PHO84-Fw-promAATCAGTATTACGCACGTTGGTGCTGTTATAGGCGCCCTATACGT GCTTCGTACGCTGCAGGTCG
PHO84-Rev-CYC1ACTTCTTTCAGCAACATGAATAGTATCTTTATTGACGGAACTCAT TTAGTGTGTGTATTTGTGTTTGC
ALG9-Fw-promTTTGATGAGA ACCGTTCTGC GATATTCAGA ACTGTCAATA CAAGCGCTTCGTACGCTGCAGGTCG
ALG9-Rev-CYC1AAAATAACAACAGTAATAAACTAATGGTTACCGCCTTGCAATTCATTTAGTGTGTGTATTTGTGTTTGC
IGPf1CGGAATTCAATCAGTATTACGCACGTTGGTGCTG
IGPrCGCGGATCCTCCATTTGGATTGTATTCGTGGAGTT
IGpTfCGGAATTCCGCATTTTACTGAACGAGTCATT
IGpTrCGCGGATCCTCCATATTTGTTTTGTGTATTATTTT
IGpYf3CGGAATTCCAATTATAGAATCTGTTGACCAAG
IGpYRCGCGGATCCTCCATTTTGATGCTTTTTTTAAAAAA
PHO84-qPCR-FwACAACCTTG TTGATCCCAG AA
PHO84-qPCR-RvTGCTTCATGTTGAAGTTGAGATG
YRO2-qPCR-FwTGCCATCTCCAGCTTCTTTC
YRO2-qPCR-RvTCCTCCTCTTCTTGGGCTTT
TPO2-qPCR-FwTCCATCGACAGTGTTGAGATG
TPO2-qPCR-RvTGTGGAAATTTGTTATTTTTGTA
HSP30-qPCR-FwCAACCAGACGGTGAGGCTAT
HSP30-qPCR-RvTCCGTAGCATGGTGATGAGA
ALG9-qPCR-FwACATCGTCGCCCCAATAAAT
ALG9-qPCR-RvGATTGGCTCCGGTTACGTTGC
ACT1-qPCR-FwCTGCCGGTATTGACCAAACT
ACT1-qPCR-RvCGGTGATTTCCTTTTGCATT
IG-PHO4-Fw-EcoRIGGGAATTCGTCTCTGTCTAATGCGGTCAC
IG-PHO4-Rv-BamHIGGGGATCCGTTCTCTCAAATCTTCCAACTGATC
PHO84-AS-cDNACTTCCAGCCCATCTCAACTTC
PHO84-SE-cDNAGAAGTTGAGATGGGCTGGAAG
PHO84-AS-PCR-FwGCATAAAAGCCTCAAAGATGC
PHO84-AS-PCR-RvTGGCAGAGAGATGTGAGGAA
Primers used in this study

Transcriptome analysis by SAGE-tag sequencing

Strain BY4741 was grown overnight at 30°C in Translucent YNB medium containing 50 mM KCl, supplemented with leucine, histidine, methionine and uracil. This culture was used to inoculate two times 50 ml of supplemented YNB medium containing 50 mM KCl yielding A600nm 0.1. These cultures were grown to A600nm 0.5 and cells were isolated by centrifugation. Cells from one culture were washed twice with supplemented YNB medium containing 50 mM KCl and resuspended in 50 ml supplemented YNB medium containing 50 mM KCl. Cells from the other culture were washed twice with supplemented YNB medium lacking KCl and resuspended in 50 ml supplemented YNB medium lacking KCl. Both cultures were incubated at 180 rpm at 30°C. After 60 min the cultures were poured into plastic tubes and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Prior to RNA isolation, the frozen cultures were thawed on ice and cells were collected by centrifugation and transferred to Eppendorf tubes using ice-cold water. RNA was isolated using the Ambion RiboPure yeast RNA Purification Kit (Life Technologies). Sequence tags were prepared by the Leiden Genome Technology Center (Leiden, the Netherlands) as described [30]. Briefly, 1 μg of total RNA was incubated with oligo-dT beads to capture the polyadenlyated RNA fraction. First- and second-strand cDNA synthesis was performed while the RNA was bound to the beads. While on the beads, samples were digested with NlaIII to retain a cDNA fragment from the most 3’ CATG to the poly(A)-tail. Subsequently, the GEX adapter 1 was ligated to the free 5’-end of the RNA, and a digestion with MmeI was performed, which cuts 17 bp downstream of the CATG site. At this point, the fragments detach from the beads. After dephosphorylation and phenol extraction, the GEX adapter 2 was ligated to the 3’-end of the tag. PCR amplification with 15 cycles using Phusion polymerase was performed with primers complementary to the adapter sequences to enrich the samples for the desired fragments. Sequencing was performed at the Leiden Genome Technology Center on Illumina Hiseq2000 sequencer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Sequence tags from six samples were bar-coded, mixed and analyzed in a single lane. Obtained sequences were aligned to a virtual tag library obtained by in silico digestion by NlaIII, cutting at 5’-CATG-3’, of S. cerevisiae sequences corresponding to open reading frames plus 200 bp downstream sequences using the CLC genomic workbench (Aarhus, Denmark). For each open reading frame the number of aligned reads per million was calculated. This was done independently for each biological replicate. Then, the average expression level with standard deviation was determined for each condition (0 or 50 mM KCl) using the four biological replicates. Statistical analysis was done using the Student’s t-test. The raw sequence data have been deposited in NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and is accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE57093.

qRT-PCR analysis

qRT-PCR was performed essentially as described earlier [41]. Yeast strains were cultivated in Translucent YNB medium and RNA was isolated as described above. RNA (1 μg) was treated with DNase I (Ambion), according to the recommended protocol, with the addition of 0.5 μl RNasin (Promega) per reaction. From each sample, 0.5 μg was used for subsequent cDNA synthesis with the oligo-dT primer, using an iScript Select cDNA kit (BioRad). Several dilutions of this cDNA were prepared and qRT-PCR was performed in 25 μl reaction volumes using a standard PCR reaction mix for Phusion DNA polymerase (Thermo Scientific), with the addition of 1.25 μl 500× diluted SYBR Green (Life Technologies) in DMSO. PCR efficiency was determined using a series of dilutions of genomic BY4741 DNA. To measure transcript levels of PHO84, YRO2, TPO2, HSP30 and ALG9, primer combinations PHO84-qPCR-Fw/PHO84-qPCR-Rv, YRO2-qPCR-Fw/YRO2-qPCR-Rv, TPO2-qPCR-Fw/TPO2-qPCR-Rv, HSP30-qPCR-Fw /HSP30-qPCR-Rv and ALG9-qPCR-Fw/ALG9-qPCR-Rv, respectively, were used. Transcript levels were normalized against expression of the ACT1, measured using the primer combination ACT1-qPCR-Fw/ACT1-qPCR-Rv. Experiments were performed on a Chromo4 Real-Time PCR Detection system controlled by the Opticon Monitor 3.1 software (Biorad).

Promoter activity assays

Promoter activity was determined by fusion of selected promoter regions to the bacterial ß-galactosidase gene in plasmid pRUL302 as described [42]. Promoter regions of PHO84, TPO2 and YRO2 were amplified by PCR on chromosomal DNA isolated from BY4741 using the primer combinations IGPf1/IGPr, IGpTf/IGpTr or IGpYf3/IGpYR, respectively, yielding fragments of 600, 510 and 2141 bp, respectively. These fragments were digested with BamH1 and EcoRI and ligated in pRUL302 digested with the same enzymes. These constructs were introduced in yeast and transformants were selected for uracil prototrophy. pRS313[PHO4] (pRUL1334), containing the PHO4 coding region and 578 bp upstream sequences and 500 bp downstream sequences was made by ligating a PCR fragment into pRS313 [43] using the restriction enzymes EcoRI and BamHI. The PHO4 PCR fragment was obtained by PCR using primers IG-PHO4-Fw-EcoRI and IG-PHO4-Rv-BamHI with BY4741 genomic DNA as template. All PCR products were analyzed by DNA sequencing. Yeast strains carrying the various pRUL302 plasmids were grown in Translucent YNB medium supplemented with histidine, methionine and leucine as described above. Yeast cells were isolated from the frozen cultures after thawing and centrifugation and resuspendend in water. ß-Galactosidase activity was measured using the Yeast β-Galactosidase Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific).

Assays for growth at low potassium concentrations

Strains were taken from the collection of systematic diploid homozygous deletion strains (Euroscarf, Germany) and were cultivated overnight in Translucent YNB medium supplemented with 50 mM KCl and histidine, uracil, leucine and methionine. Aliquots of these cultures were centrifuged and cells were washed twice with Translucent YNB medium lacking potassium and subsequently resuspended in Translucent YNB medium lacking potassium till A620 of 0.5. Ten-fold serial dilutions were made in the same medium and 10 μl aliquots were spotted on plates with Translucent YNB medium with different concentrations of KCl supplemented with histidine, uracil, leucine and methionine. As controls BY4741 and Δtrk1Δtrk2 in BY4741 were included. Plates were incubated at 30°C for 3 days. Additional file 1: Effect of potassium starvation on RNA levels determined by SAGE tag sequencing. (PDF 286 KB) Additional file 2: Effect of potassium starvation on antisense transcript levels determined by SAGE tag sequencing. (PDF 283 KB) Additional file 3: Genes of which antisense transcripts are up‒ or down‒regulated more than 2‒fold upon potassium starvation (P<0.01). (PDF 82 KB)
  42 in total

1.  Antisense RNA stabilization induces transcriptional gene silencing via histone deacetylation in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jurgi Camblong; Nahid Iglesias; Céline Fickentscher; Guennaelle Dieppois; Françoise Stutz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Function and regulation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ENA sodium ATPase system.

Authors:  Amparo Ruiz; Joaquín Ariño
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2007-10-19

3.  Yeast translational response to high salinity: global analysis reveals regulation at multiple levels.

Authors:  Daniel Melamed; Lilach Pnueli; Yoav Arava
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 4.942

4.  Transcriptional regulation of YML083c under aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

Authors:  J J M Ter Linde; M Régnacq; H Y Steensma
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 3.239

5.  Characterization of potassium transport in wild-type and isogenic yeast strains carrying all combinations of trk1, trk2 and tok1 null mutations.

Authors:  Adam Bertl; José Ramos; Jost Ludwig; Hella Lichtenberg-Fraté; John Reid; Hermann Bihler; Fernando Calero; Paula Martínez; Per O Ljungdahl
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: new fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes.

Authors:  Carsten Janke; Maria M Magiera; Nicole Rathfelder; Christof Taxis; Simone Reber; Hiromi Maekawa; Alexandra Moreno-Borchart; Georg Doenges; Etienne Schwob; Elmar Schiebel; Michael Knop
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.239

7.  Potassium channel dysfunction in fibroblasts identifies patients with Alzheimer disease.

Authors:  R Etcheberrigaray; E Ito; K Oka; B Tofel-Grehl; G E Gibson; D L Alkon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Bidirectional promoters generate pervasive transcription in yeast.

Authors:  Zhenyu Xu; Wu Wei; Julien Gagneur; Fabiana Perocchi; Sandra Clauder-Münster; Jurgi Camblong; Elisa Guffanti; Françoise Stutz; Wolfgang Huber; Lars M Steinmetz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Ammonium toxicity and potassium limitation in yeast.

Authors:  David C Hess; Wenyun Lu; Joshua D Rabinowitz; David Botstein
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Antisense artifacts in transcriptome microarray experiments are resolved by actinomycin D.

Authors:  Fabiana Perocchi; Zhenyu Xu; Sandra Clauder-Münster; Lars M Steinmetz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

1.  The acid phosphatase Pho5 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is not involved in polyphosphate breakdown.

Authors:  Nadeshda Andreeva; Larisa Ledova; Lubov Ryasanova; Tatiana Kulakovskaya; Michail Eldarov
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Lack of 14-3-3 proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in cell-to-cell heterogeneity in the expression of Pho4-regulated genes SPL2 and PHO84.

Authors:  Janneke H M Teunissen; Marjolein E Crooijmans; Pepijn P P Teunisse; G Paul H van Heusden
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.969

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.