| Literature DB >> 25432771 |
Sean C L Deoni1, Jonathan O'Muircheartaigh2, Jed T Elison3, Lindsay Walker4, Ellen Doernberg4, Nicole Waskiewicz4, Holly Dirks4, Irene Piryatinsky4, Doug C Dean4, N L Jumbe5.
Abstract
Infancy and early childhood are periods of rapid brain development, during which brain structure and function mature alongside evolving cognitive ability. An important neurodevelopmental process during this postnatal period is the maturation of the myelinated white matter, which facilitates rapid communication across neural systems and networks. Though prior brain imaging studies in children (4 years of age and above), adolescents, and adults have consistently linked white matter development with cognitive maturation and intelligence, few studies have examined how these processes are related throughout early development (birth to 4 years of age). Here, we show that the profile of white matter myelination across the first 5 years of life is strongly and specifically related to cognitive ability. Using a longitudinal design, coupled with advanced magnetic resonance imaging, we demonstrate that children with above-average ability show differential trajectories of myelin development compared to average and below average ability children, even when controlling for socioeconomic status, gestation, and birth weight. Specifically, higher ability children exhibit slower but more prolonged early development, resulting in overall increased myelin measures by ~3 years of age. These results provide new insight into the early neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive ability, and suggest an early period of prolonged maturation with associated protracted white matter plasticity may result in strengthened neural networks that can better support later development. Further, these results reinforce the necessity of a longitudinal perspective in investigating typical or suspected atypical cognitive maturation.Entities:
Keywords: Brain development; Cognitive maturation; Myelination; Neurodevelopment; White matter growth
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25432771 PMCID: PMC4771819 DOI: 10.1007/s00429-014-0947-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Struct Funct ISSN: 1863-2653 Impact factor: 3.270
Participant demographic information
| Full sample | |
| Gender | |
| Male ( | 148 |
| Female ( | 109 |
| Racial background | |
| Caucasian ( | 179 |
| African American ( | 25 |
| Asian ( | 6 |
| Mixed race ( | 37 |
| Mean age (days) | 784 ± 521 |
| Age range (days) | 98–1,814 |
| Mean gestation (weeks) | 39.1 ± 3.2 |
| Mean birth weight (lbs) | 7.4 ± 1.1 |
| Mean maternal SES | 5.53 ± 1.54 |
| Infants | |
| Gender | |
| Male ( | 20 |
| Female ( | 18 |
| Racial background | |
| Caucasian ( | 17 |
| African American ( | 1 |
| Asian ( | 2 |
| Mixed race ( | 8 |
| Mean age (days) | 234 ± 44 |
| Age range (days) | 98–363 |
| Mean gestation (weeks) | 39.3 ± 1.1 |
| Mean birth weight (lbs) | 7.4 ± 1.1 |
| Mean maternal SES | 5.3 ± 1.8 |
| Mean ELC | 93.8 ± 16.6 |
| Toddlers | |
| Gender | |
| Male ( | 43 |
| Female ( | 43 |
| Racial background | |
| Caucasian ( | 64 |
| African American ( | 10 |
| Asian ( | 0 |
| Mixed race ( | 12 |
| Mean age (days) | 482 ± 103 |
| Age range (days) | 365–725 |
| Mean gestation (weeks) | 39.4 ± 1.3 |
| Mean birth weight (lbs) | 7.5 ± 0.95 |
| Mean maternal SES | 5.3 ± 1.98 |
| Mean ELC | 94.6 ± 15.1 |
| Young children | |
| Gender | |
| Male ( | 56 |
| Female ( | 48 |
| Racial background | |
| Caucasian ( | 69 |
| African American ( | 14 |
| Asian ( | 4 |
| Mixed race ( | 17 |
| Mean age (days) | 1,296 ± 325 |
| Age range (days) | 737–1,814 |
| Mean gestation (weeks) | 38.9 ± 1.8 |
| Mean birth weight (lbs) | 7.3 ± 1.2 |
| Mean maternal SES | 5.83 ± 1.03 |
| Mean ELC | 97.7 ± 18.1 |
Longitudinal participant demographics
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Below average | |||
| Gender | |||
| Male | 23 |
| 0.33 |
| Female | 11 | ||
| Racial background | |||
| Caucasian | 22 |
| 0.64 |
| African American | 0 | ||
| Asian | 8 | ||
| Mixed race | 4 | ||
| Cognitive ability | |||
| Mean ELC | 79.8 ± 5.4 |
|
|
| Mean NVDQ | 3.03 ± 0.46 |
|
|
| Mean VDQ | 2.65 ± 0.56 |
|
|
| Mean age (days) | 868 ± 98 |
| 0.36 |
| Age range (days) | 98–1,808 | ||
| Mean gestation (weeks) | 39.7 ± 1.5 |
| 0.35 |
| Mean birth weight (lbs) | 7.2 ± 1.5 |
| 0.9 |
| Mean maternal SES | 5.23 ± 1.8 |
| 0.14 |
| Average | |||
| Gender | |||
| Male | 28 | ||
| Female | 26 | ||
| Racial background | |||
| Caucasian | 38 | ||
| African American | 2 | ||
| Asian | 7 | ||
| Mixed race | 7 | ||
| Cognitive ability | |||
| Mean ELC | 98.8 ± 6.5 | ||
| Mean NVDQ | 3.35 ± 0.43 | ||
| Mean VDQ | 3.21 ± 0.55 | ||
| Mean age (days) | 888 ± 98 | ||
| Age range (days) | 101–1,814 | ||
| Mean gestation (weeks) | 39.4 ± 1.3 | ||
| Mean birth weight (lbs) | 7.3 ± 1.1 | ||
| Mean maternal SES | 5.7 ± 1.3 | ||
| Above average | |||
| Gender | |||
| Male | 22 | ||
| Female | 16 | ||
| Racial background | |||
| Caucasian | 27 | ||
| African American | 2 | ||
| Asian | 4 | ||
| Mixed race | 5 | ||
| Cognitive ability | |||
| Mean ELC | 121.1 ± 5.2 | ||
| Mean NVDQ | 3.8 ± 0.51 | ||
| Mean VDQ | 3.8 ± 0.57 | ||
| Mean age (days) | 898 ± 76 | ||
| Age range (days) | 99–1,807 | ||
| Mean gestation (weeks) | 39.8 ± 1.4 | ||
| Mean birth weight (lbs) | 7.2 ± 1.0 | ||
| Mean maternal SES | 5.97 ± 1.73 | ||
Age-optimized mcDESPOT imaging protocols
| Age group | 3–9 months | 9–16 months | 16–28 months | 28–60 months |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acquisition time (min) | 18:22 | 18:42 | 21:38 | 0 h 24 m 20 s |
| Field of view (cm) | 14 × 14 × 13 | 17 × 17 × 14.4 | 18 × 18 × 15 | 20 × 20 × 15 |
| Image matrix | 80 × 80 × 76 | 96 × 96 × 80 | 104 × 104 × 84 | 112 × 112 × 84 |
| SPGR TE/TR (ms) | 5.8 ms/12 ms | 5.9 ms/12 ms | 5.4 ms/12 ms | 5.2 ms/11 ms |
| SPGR flip angles (°) | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 14 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 14 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 14 | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 16 |
| SPGR bandwidth (Hz/pixel) | 350 | 350 | 350 | 350 |
| IR-SPGR TI/TE/TR (ms) | (600, 950) ms/5.8 ms/12 ms | (600, 900) ms/5.9 ms/12 ms | (500, 850) ms/5.4 ms/12 ms | (500, 800) ms/5.2 ms/11 ms |
| IR-SPGR flip angle (°) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| IR-SPGR image matrix | 80 × 80 × 38 | 96 × 96 × 40 | 108 × 104 × 42 | 112 × 112 × 42 |
| bSSFP TE/TR (ms) | 5 ms/10 ms | 5.1 ms/10.2 ms | 5 ms/10 ms | 4.4 ms/9.8 ms |
| bSSFP flip angles (°) | 9, 14, 20, 27, 34, 41, 56, 70 | 9, 14, 20, 27, 34, 41, 56, 70 | 9, 14, 20, 27, 34, 41, 56, 70 | 9, 14, 20, 27, 34, 41, 56, 70 |
| bSSFP bandwidth (Hz/pixel) | 350 | 350 | 350 | 350 |
Fig. 1Example of modified Gompertz growth model defined by four parameters that reflect an initial period of slow growth (β), initial growth rate (γ), a period of transition from fast to slower growth (α), and a secondary growth rate (η)
Fig. 2Correlations between ELC and MWF. Across the full cohort we found a significant (p < 0.05 corrected) positive correlation between overall cognitive ability and MWF in the splenium of the corpus callosum. In the individual age groups, we found significant positive correlations were identified in the body and splenium of the corpus callosum; bilateral internal capsule, corticospinal tracts and primary motor and somatosensory cortices, optic radiations, superior longitudinal fasciculus, posterior cingulate, visual and auditory cortex, and cerebellar white matter in toddlers. In young children, significant positive correlations were found in throughout the corpus callosum; left Wernicke’s area and primary somatosensory cortex; and right premotor cortex and anterior cingulate
Fig. 3Across the full cohort of children, we also examined age × ELC interaction within our GLM framework. Brain regions exhibiting significant interaction are shown and include frontal, parietal, and temporal lobe WM, as well as splenium and body of the corpus callosum
Fig. 4Correlations between MWF and VDQ (red-yellow) and NVDQ (light to dark blue). Significant positive associations between MWF and NVDQ were identified throughout the corpus callosum and left cerebellum in the full cohort. A trend towards a significant relationship between MWF and VDQ was also identified in left Broca’s area (p < 0.09). In the individual age groups, no associations were identified in the infant group. In toddlers, MWF and NVDQ were significantly associated in bilateral corticospinal tracts, cerebellum, and premotor and primary motor cortices; and a trend towards a significant (p < 0.10, corrected) MWF and VDQ association was found in right temporal lobe and superior longitudinal fasciculus. In young children, a significant MWF and NVDQ association was found in bilateral cerebellum, left temporal lobe, left internal capsule and right premotor and primary motor cortices
Fig. 5Reconstructed continuous mean Gompertz growth curves for each brain region investigated. In all cases, a developmental trend with above average ELC (blue lines) > average ELC (red lines) > below average ELC (green lines)
Comparisons of individual growth model parameters between ability level groups
| Brain region | Model term | Above average | Average | Below average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global WM |
| 0.13 (0.007)†,‡ | 0.11 (0.003) | 0.11 (0.006) |
|
| 1.33 (0.09)†,‡ | 1.50 (0.09) | 1.43 (0.16) | |
|
| 0.005 (0.0005)†,‡ | 0.007 (0.0004)ℑ | 0.006 (0.0007) | |
|
| 0.0005 (0.00004)†,‡ | 0.0001 (0.00002) | 0.0001 (0.00004) | |
| Body CC |
| 0.15 (0.009)†,‡ | 0.14 (0.005)ℑ | 0.12 (0.007) |
|
| 1.56 (0.12)†,‡ | 1.73 (0.12)ℑ | 1.96 (0.32) | |
|
| 0.006 (0.0006)†,‡ | 0.007 (0.0005)ℑ | 0.009 (0.0001) | |
|
| 0.0007 (0.00004)†,‡ | 0.0001 (0.00003)ℑ | 0.002 (0.00005) | |
| Genu CC |
| 0.14 (0.011)†,‡ | 0.12 (0.005) | 0.12 (0.006) |
|
| 1.63 (0.22)†,‡ | 2.05 (0.18)ℑ | 2.22 (0.19) | |
|
| 0.006 (0.0009)†,‡ | 0.008 (0.0007) | 0.008 (0.0007) | |
|
| 0.0001 (0.00006)†,‡ | 0.0002 (0.00003) | 0.0002 (0.00003) | |
| Splenium CC |
| 0.13 (0.006)†,‡ | 0.12 (0.004)ℑ | 0.12 (0.006) |
|
| 1.77 (0.15)† | 1.91 (0.11) | 1.86 (0.21) | |
|
| 0.008 (0.0007)† | 0.008 (0.0005)ℑ | 0.008 (0.0009) | |
|
| 0.0001 (0.00004)‡ | 0.0001 (0.00003)ℑ | 0.0001 (0.00004) | |
| Cerebellar WM |
| ANOVA, | ||
|
| 0.56 (0.08)‡ | 0.57 (0.04)ℑ | 0.024 (0.13) | |
|
| 0.005 (0.0006) | 0.0005 (0.0004)ℑ | 0.004 (0.0009) | |
|
| 0.0001 (0.00004)‡ | 0.0002 (0.00001) | 0.0002 (0.000005) | |
| Frontal WM |
| 0.12 (0.008)†,‡ | 0.10 (0.005)ℑ | 0.098 (0.006) |
|
| 1.53 (0.12)†,‡ | 1.82 (0.15) | 1.86 (0.21) | |
|
| 0.005 (0.0005)†,‡ | 0.007 (0.0006) | 0.007 (0.0008) | |
|
| 0.0008 (0.00005)†,‡ | 0.0002 (0.00004)ℑ | 0.0002 (0.00004) | |
| Temporal WM |
| 0.13 (0.009)†,‡ | 0.11 (0.005)ℑ | 0.11 (0.006) |
|
| 1.56 (0.12)†,‡ | 1.91 (0.12) | 1.90 (0.19) | |
|
| 0.005 (0.0005)†,‡ | 0.0007 (0.0005)ℑ | 0.007 (0.0007) | |
|
| 0.0005 (0.00005)†,‡ | 0.0001 (0.00003)ℑ | 0.0002 (0.00004) | |
| Parietal WM |
| 0.12 (0.007)†,‡ | 0.11 (0.004)ℑ | 0.10 (0.005) |
|
| 1.54 (0.12)†,‡ | 1.80 (0.11) | 1.82 (0.19) | |
|
| 0.006 (0.0006)†,‡ | 0.0078 (0.0005) | 0.007 (0.0008) | |
|
| 0.0005 (0.00004)†,‡ | 0.0001 (0.00003)ℑ | 0.0001 (0.00003) | |
| Occipital WM |
| 0.15 (0.009)†,‡ | 0.13 (0.004) | 0.13 (0.007) |
|
| 0.99 (0.08)† | 1.12 (0.09)ℑ | 0.97 (0.13) | |
|
| 0.005 (0.0005)†,‡ | 0.007 (0.0005)ℑ | 0.006 (0.0007) | |
|
| 0.0004 (0.00004)†,‡ | 0.0001 (0.00003) | 0.0001 (0.00003) | |
†Significant difference between the Above average and Average groups; ‡ significant difference between the Above average and Below average groups; and ℑ between the Average and Below average groups. All significance is defined as p < 0.0013
Fig. 6Comparison of whole-brain white matter MWF development. Reconstructed continuous growth models for mean whole-brain white matter calculated using the longitudinal data from the above average (blue), average (red), and below average (green) ELC children. Individual data points represent the mean values calculated from each individual child’s data. The results show a trend seen in all other investigated brain regions, with overall development in the above-average children > average > below average. Differences in development are more clearly visualized by examining the ΔMWF curves, which show an early delay in myelination onset and prolonged myelination in the above-average children, resulting in an overall increase in MWF in later childhood