| Literature DB >> 25432399 |
Alagu Manickavelu, Abdulqader Jighly, Tomohiro Ban.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Landraces are an important source of genetic diversity in common wheat, but archival collections of Afghan wheat landraces remain poorly characterised. The recent development of array based marker systems, particularly single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, provide an excellent tool for examining the genetic diversity of local populations. Here we used SNP analysis to demonstrate the importance of Afghan wheat landraces and found tremendous genetic diversity and province-specific characteristics unique to this geographic region.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25432399 PMCID: PMC4255927 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-014-0320-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Figure 1Geographical location of Afghan wheat landraces and their grouping based on agro-ecological zones. The map is divide into eight agro-ecological zones according to FAO [Food and Agricultural Organization]. The number of accessions from each province are shown in green squared boxes.
Figure 2Classification of spikes in Afghan wheat landraces. The germplasm number and botanical variety for each landrace are mentioned in the attached label. Although a total of 19 botanical varieties were identified, only those showing clear variation are shown here.
Figure 3Chromosomal locations of SNP markers. Markers were arranged along the long arm (green), centromere (dark red), and short arm (blue), respectively. For the markers on chromosome 3B, there are no details regarding chromosome arm.
Figure 4Distribution of pairwise (a) Roger’s genetic distance among the landraces; (b) Roger’s genetic distance between landraces and controls; (c) relative kinship among landraces, and (d) relative kinship calculated between landraces and controls.
Figure 5Diversity of Afghan wheat landraces. Each province is identified using a different colour. Landraces with unknown origins and those collected from Ghazni, Kunduz, Parwan, and Wardak provinces were left unshaded. Individual clade dendrograms are shown in Additional file 2: Figure S2.
The kinship coefficients (below diameter) and the distances (above diameter) among highly differentiated landraces; mean germplasm distances and the durum control are also shown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 743 | - | 0.32 | 0.21 | 0.004 | 0.39 | 0.43 |
| 818 | 0.53 | - | 0.33 | 0.32 | 0.25 | 0.36 |
| 942 | 1.05 | 0.52 | - | 0.21 | 0.39 | 0.43 |
| 943 | 1.98 | 0.53 | 1.03 | - | 0.39 | 0.44 |
| Durum | 0.23 | 0.88 | 0.23 | 0.26 | - | 0.45 |
| Average | 0.05 | 0.37 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 0.009 | - |
Full descriptions of each landrace number are available in Additional file 1: Table S1.
Figure 6Population structures of Afghan wheat landraces according to collection site and botanical variety. Population structure analysis resulted in 15 sub-populations (K = 15). Details of the botanical variety composition are indicated for each group. Mixed type structure is defined as landraces lacking a specific botanical variety and those in which the province of origin is not known.
Figure 7Population structures of 385 Afghan wheat landraces collected from nine provinces (K = 2 to 10); only provinces with ≥10 landraces were used in this analysis.
Nei’s genetic distance of Afghan wheat landraces from selected provinces
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.130 |
| |||||||
| 0.075 | 0.092 |
| ||||||
| 0.105 | 0.054 | 0.036 |
| |||||
| 0.111 | 0.039 | 0.070 | 0.027 |
| ||||
| 0.046 | 0.085 | 0.064 | 0.066 | 0.061 |
| |||
| 0.197 | 0.109 | 0.149 | 0.090 | 0.064 | 0.122 |
| ||
| 0.074 | 0.093 | 0.102 | 0.101 | 0.088 | 0.056 | 0.142 |
| |
| 0.035 | 0.199 | 0.125 | 0.183 | 0.186 | 0.090 | 0.267 | 0.103 |
|
Figure 8Principal component analysis of Afghan wheat landraces. The first coordinate explained 52.7% of the variability, while the second one accounted for an additional 17.6%.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for the landraces collected from nine provinces, Badakhshan, Takhar, Ghor, Herat, Kabul, Badghis, Kandahar, Bamyan, and Samangan (1, 2 and 3), according to their geographical distribution, and for all collected landraces with (4) and without (5) controls, according to their year of collection
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 1- Nine populations one region | Among populations | 14% |
| Within populations | 86% | |
| 2- Two populations one region** | Between populations | 16% |
| Within populations | 84% | |
| 3- Nine populations two regions** | Between regions | 13% |
| Among populations | 4% | |
| Within populations | 83% | |
| 4- Two populations landraces & controls | Between populations | 5% |
| Within populations | 95% | |
| 5- Three populations year of collection | Among populations | 12% |
| Within populations | 88% |
*P <0.001.
**Badakhshan and Takhar provinces were considered as one population in (2) and as a single region in (3), while the remaining provinces were considered as a single population in (2) and as a single region in (3).