Christopher Y Park1, Arjun Krishnan2, Qian Zhu1, Aaron K Wong1, Young-Suk Lee1, Olga G Troyanskaya3. 1. Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA, Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA and Simons Center for Data Analysis, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, 10010, USA Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA, Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA and Simons Center for Data Analysis, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, 10010, USA. 2. Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA, Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA and Simons Center for Data Analysis, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, 10010, USA. 3. Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA, Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA and Simons Center for Data Analysis, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, 10010, USA Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA, Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA and Simons Center for Data Analysis, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, 10010, USA Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA, Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA and Simons Center for Data Analysis, Simons Foundation, New York, NY, 10010, USA.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Leveraging the large compendium of genomic data to predict biomedical pathways and specific mechanisms of protein interactions genome-wide in metazoan organisms has been challenging. In contrast to unicellular organisms, biological and technical variation originating from diverse tissues and cell-lineages is often the largest source of variation in metazoan data compendia. Therefore, a new computational strategy accounting for the tissue heterogeneity in the functional genomic data is needed to accurately translate the vast amount of human genomic data into specific interaction-level hypotheses. RESULTS: We developed an integrated, scalable strategy for inferring multiple human gene interaction types that takes advantage of data from diverse tissue and cell-lineage origins. Our approach specifically predicts both the presence of a functional association and also the most likely interaction type among human genes or its protein products on a whole-genome scale. We demonstrate that directly incorporating tissue contextual information improves the accuracy of our predictions, and further, that such genome-wide results can be used to significantly refine regulatory interactions from primary experimental datasets (e.g. ChIP-Seq, mass spectrometry). AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An interactive website hosting all of our interaction predictions is publically available at http://pathwaynet.princeton.edu. Software was implemented using the open-source Sleipnir library, which is available for download at https://bitbucket.org/libsleipnir/libsleipnir.bitbucket.org. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: Leveraging the large compendium of genomic data to predict biomedical pathways and specific mechanisms of protein interactions genome-wide in metazoan organisms has been challenging. In contrast to unicellular organisms, biological and technical variation originating from diverse tissues and cell-lineages is often the largest source of variation in metazoan data compendia. Therefore, a new computational strategy accounting for the tissue heterogeneity in the functional genomic data is needed to accurately translate the vast amount of human genomic data into specific interaction-level hypotheses. RESULTS: We developed an integrated, scalable strategy for inferring multiple human gene interaction types that takes advantage of data from diverse tissue and cell-lineage origins. Our approach specifically predicts both the presence of a functional association and also the most likely interaction type among human genes or its protein products on a whole-genome scale. We demonstrate that directly incorporating tissue contextual information improves the accuracy of our predictions, and further, that such genome-wide results can be used to significantly refine regulatory interactions from primary experimental datasets (e.g. ChIP-Seq, mass spectrometry). AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An interactive website hosting all of our interaction predictions is publically available at http://pathwaynet.princeton.edu. Software was implemented using the open-source Sleipnir library, which is available for download at https://bitbucket.org/libsleipnir/libsleipnir.bitbucket.org. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: M A Harris; J Clark; A Ireland; J Lomax; M Ashburner; R Foulger; K Eilbeck; S Lewis; B Marshall; C Mungall; J Richter; G M Rubin; J A Blake; C Bult; M Dolan; H Drabkin; J T Eppig; D P Hill; L Ni; M Ringwald; R Balakrishnan; J M Cherry; K R Christie; M C Costanzo; S S Dwight; S Engel; D G Fisk; J E Hirschman; E L Hong; R S Nash; A Sethuraman; C L Theesfeld; D Botstein; K Dolinski; B Feierbach; T Berardini; S Mundodi; S Y Rhee; R Apweiler; D Barrell; E Camon; E Dimmer; V Lee; R Chisholm; P Gaudet; W Kibbe; R Kishore; E M Schwarz; P Sternberg; M Gwinn; L Hannick; J Wortman; M Berriman; V Wood; N de la Cruz; P Tonellato; P Jaiswal; T Seigfried; R White Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Silvia Fernández de Mattos; Abdelkader Essafi; Inês Soeiro; Alexandra M Pietersen; Kim U Birkenkamp; Corinne S Edwards; Anthony Martino; Brad H Nelson; Julia M Francis; Marius C Jones; Jan J Brosens; Paul J Coffer; Eric W-F Lam Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Andrew I Su; Tim Wiltshire; Serge Batalov; Hilmar Lapp; Keith A Ching; David Block; Jie Zhang; Richard Soden; Mimi Hayakawa; Gabriel Kreiman; Michael P Cooke; John R Walker; John B Hogenesch Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-04-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Shilpa Bhatia; Jaspreet Sharma; Sanjana Bukkapatnam; Ayman Oweida; Shelby Lennon; Andy Phan; Dallin Milner; Nomin Uyanga; Antonio Jimeno; David Raben; Hilary Somerset; Lynn Heasley; Sana D Karam Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Dmitriy Gorenshteyn; Elena Zaslavsky; Miguel Fribourg; Christopher Y Park; Aaron K Wong; Alicja Tadych; Boris M Hartmann; Randy A Albrecht; Adolfo García-Sastre; Steven H Kleinstein; Olga G Troyanskaya; Stuart C Sealfon Journal: Immunity Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 31.745
Authors: Sofia Khan; Rainer Fagerholm; Latha Kadalayil; William Tapper; Kristiina Aittomäki; Jianjun Liu; Carl Blomqvist; Diana Eccles; Heli Nevanlinna Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2017-11-28
Authors: Kimberly R Jordan; Matthew J Sikora; Jill E Slansky; Angela Minic; Jennifer K Richer; Marisa R Moroney; Junxiao Hu; Rebecca J Wolsky; Zachary L Watson; Tomomi M Yamamoto; James C Costello; Aaron Clauset; Kian Behbakht; T Rajendra Kumar; Benjamin G Bitler Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-09-14 Impact factor: 12.531