| Literature DB >> 25431190 |
Carolyn E Riddell, Juan D Lobaton Garces, Sally Adams, Seth M Barribeau, David Twell, Eamonn B Mallon1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ecological studies routinely show genotype-genotype interactions between insects and their parasites. The mechanisms behind these interactions are not clearly understood. Using the bumblebee Bombus terrestris/trypanosome Crithidia bombi model system (two bumblebee colonies by two Crithidia strains), we have carried out a transcriptome-wide analysis of gene expression and alternative splicing in bees during C. bombi infection. We have performed four analyses, 1) comparing gene expression in infected and non-infected bees 24 hours after infection by Crithidia bombi, 2) comparing expression at 24 and 48 hours after C. bombi infection, 3) determining the differential gene expression associated with the bumblebee-Crithidia genotype-genotype interaction at 24 hours after infection and 4) determining the alternative splicing associated with the bumblebee-Crithidia genotype-genotype interaction at 24 hours post infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25431190 PMCID: PMC4302123 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Figure 1Enriched GO terms found for differentially expressed genes at 24 hours post infection (infected versus uninfected). Using Blast2Go, we carried out an enrichment analysis (Fisher exact test p < 0.05) to see which GO terms are overrepresented relative to the entire transcriptome. These enriched GO terms were then summarized using Revigo.
Figure 2Correlations of the chitin transcripts’ expression patterns that where differentially expressed twenty four hours post-infection compared to uninfected samples (infected versus uninfected). Clustering is produced based on Euclidean distances. The histogram shows the distribution of correlation values.
List of transcripts associated with serine proteases and serine protease inhibitors found to be differentially expressed twenty four hours post infection with (Infected versus uninfected)
| Serine proteases | Upregulated | Downregulated |
|---|---|---|
|
| BTT20125_1 | |
|
| BTT07313_1, BTT31897_1 | |
|
| BTT10579_1, BTT10912_1, | |
| BTT18247_1BTT25711_1, | ||
| BTT06803_1 | ||
|
| BTT03436_1 | |
|
| BTT08108_1, BTT38696_1 | |
|
| BTT05300_1 | |
| Serine protease | Upregulated | Downregulated |
| homologues | ||
|
| BTT01977_1 | BTT06125_1 |
| Serine protease | Upregulated | Downregulated |
| inhibitors | ||
|
| BTT31997_1 | |
|
| BTT04130_1, BTT40693_1, | |
| BTT41025_1, BTT41461_1 | ||
|
| BTT04508_1, BTT20259_1 |
Figure 3Correlations of the immunity transcripts’ expression patterns that were differentially expressed depending on host genotype – parasite genotype interactions (Specifcity). Clustering is produced based on Euclidean distances. The histogram shows the distribution of correlation values.
List of transcripts associated with serine proteases and serine protease inhibitors found to be differentially expressed in the specificity analysis
| Serine proteases | Upregulated | Downregulated |
|---|---|---|
|
| BTT35293_1 | BTT10579_1, BTT10912_1, BTT18247_1, BTT25711_1 |
|
| BTT20808_1 | |
|
| BTT40251_1 | |
|
| BTT20637_1 | |
|
| BTT05300_1 | BTT10155_1 |
|
| BTT15256_1 | |
|
| BTT01709_1, BTT05886_1, BTT09081_1, BTT20661_1, BTT20725_1, BTT24359_1, BTT25071_1 | |
| Serine protease homologues | Upregulated | Downregulated |
|
| BTT21868_1 | |
|
| BTT27769_1 | |
|
| BTT17814_1 | |
| Serine protease inhibitors | Upregulated | Downregulated |
|
| BTT14993_1 | |
|
| BTT35742_1 | |
|
| BTT04130_1 | |
|
| BTT02607_1, BTT4508_1, BTT20259_1, BTT40693_1 |
Figure 4(XLOC_010845 XLOC_010849) differential exon usage for each of the four host-parasite strain combinations (K6, K8 Q6, Q8). DEXSeq removes the gene-level changes in expression so the differential exon usage is clear. Below is the gene model produced by our cufflinks analysis. The grey blocks are normal exons, the purple blocks represent those exons showing alternative splicing.