Literature DB >> 25430050

Processing strategies and software solutions for data-independent acquisition in mass spectrometry.

Aivett Bilbao1, Emmanuel Varesio, Jeremy Luban, Caterina Strambio-De-Castillia, Gérard Hopfgartner, Markus Müller, Frédérique Lisacek.   

Abstract

Data-independent acquisition (DIA) offers several advantages over data-dependent acquisition (DDA) schemes for characterizing complex protein digests analyzed by LC-MS/MS. In contrast to the sequential detection, selection, and analysis of individual ions during DDA, DIA systematically parallelizes the fragmentation of all detectable ions within a wide m/z range regardless of intensity, thereby providing broader dynamic range of detected signals, improved reproducibility for identification, better sensitivity, and accuracy for quantification, and, potentially, enhanced proteome coverage. To fully exploit these advantages, composite or multiplexed fragment ion spectra generated by DIA require more elaborate processing algorithms compared to DDA. This review examines different DIA schemes and, in particular, discusses the concepts applied to and related to data processing. Available software implementations for identification and quantification are presented as comprehensively as possible and examples of software usage are cited. Processing workflows, including complete proprietary frameworks or combinations of modules from different open source data processing packages are described and compared in terms of software availability and usability, programming language, operating system support, input/output data formats, as well as the main principles employed in the algorithms used for identification and quantification. This comparative study concludes with further discussion of current limitations and expectable improvements in the short- and midterm future.
© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bottom-up proteomics; Data processing and analysis; Data-independent acquisition; Label-free quantification; Mass spectrometry-LC-MS/MS

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25430050     DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201400323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  39 in total

1.  Peptide-level Robust Ridge Regression Improves Estimation, Sensitivity, and Specificity in Data-dependent Quantitative Label-free Shotgun Proteomics.

Authors:  Ludger J E Goeminne; Kris Gevaert; Lieven Clement
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Mapping Biological Networks from Quantitative Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry: Data to Knowledge Pipelines.

Authors:  Erin L Crowgey; Andrea Matlock; Vidya Venkatraman; Justyna Fert-Bober; Jennifer E Van Eyk
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2017

3.  Toward a Consensus on Applying Quantitative Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Proteomics in Translational Pharmacology Research: A White Paper.

Authors:  Bhagwat Prasad; Brahim Achour; Per Artursson; Cornelis E C A Hop; Yurong Lai; Philip C Smith; Jill Barber; Jacek R Wisniewski; Daniel Spellman; Yasuo Uchida; Michael A Zientek; Jashvant D Unadkat; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Quantitative Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics: An Overview.

Authors:  Svitlana Rozanova; Katalin Barkovits; Miroslav Nikolov; Carla Schmidt; Henning Urlaub; Katrin Marcus
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

5.  diaPASEF: parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation combined with data-independent acquisition.

Authors:  Florian Meier; Andreas-David Brunner; Max Frank; Annie Ha; Isabell Bludau; Eugenia Voytik; Stephanie Kaspar-Schoenefeld; Markus Lubeck; Oliver Raether; Nicolai Bache; Ruedi Aebersold; Ben C Collins; Hannes L Röst; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 28.547

6.  Relative protein quantification and accessible biology in lung tumor proteomes from four LC-MS/MS discovery platforms.

Authors:  Paul A Stewart; Bin Fang; Robbert J C Slebos; Guolin Zhang; Adam L Borne; Katherine Fellows; Jamie K Teer; Y Ann Chen; Eric Welsh; Steven A Eschrich; Eric B Haura; John M Koomen
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  Untargeted, spectral library-free analysis of data-independent acquisition proteomics data generated using Orbitrap mass spectrometers.

Authors:  Chih-Chiang Tsou; Chia-Feng Tsai; Guo Ci Teo; Yu-Ju Chen; Alexey I Nesvizhskii
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 8.  Advances in targeted proteomics and applications to biomedical research.

Authors:  Tujin Shi; Ehwang Song; Song Nie; Karin D Rodland; Tao Liu; Wei-Jun Qian; Richard D Smith
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 9.  Clinical applications of quantitative proteomics using targeted and untargeted data-independent acquisition techniques.

Authors:  Jesse G Meyer; Birgit Schilling
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.940

10.  Advanced Precursor Ion Selection Algorithms for Increased Depth of Bottom-Up Proteomic Profiling.

Authors:  Simion Kreimer; Mikhail E Belov; William F Danielson; Lev I Levitsky; Mikhail V Gorshkov; Barry L Karger; Alexander R Ivanov
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.