Literature DB >> 28195392

Relative protein quantification and accessible biology in lung tumor proteomes from four LC-MS/MS discovery platforms.

Paul A Stewart1, Bin Fang2, Robbert J C Slebos1, Guolin Zhang1, Adam L Borne1, Katherine Fellows1, Jamie K Teer3, Y Ann Chen3, Eric Welsh3, Steven A Eschrich3, Eric B Haura1, John M Koomen4.   

Abstract

Discovery proteomics experiments include many options for sample preparation and MS data acquisition, which are capable of creating datasets for quantifying thousands of proteins. To define a strategy that would produce a dataset with sufficient content while optimizing required resources, we compared (1) single-sample LC-MS/MS with data-dependent acquisition to single-sample LC-MS/MS with data-independent acquisition and (2) peptide fractionation with label-free (LF) quantification to peptide fractionation with relative quantification of chemically labeled peptides (sixplex tandem mass tags (TMT)). These strategies were applied to the same set of four frozen lung squamous cell carcinomas and four adjacent tissues, and the overall outcomes of each experiment were assessed. We identified 6656 unique protein groups with LF, 5535 using TMT, 3409 proteins from single-sample analysis with data-independent acquisition, and 2219 proteins from single-sample analysis with data-dependent acquisition. Pathway analysis indicated the number of proteins per pathway was proportional to the total protein identifications from each method, suggesting limited biological bias between experiments. The results suggest the use of single-sample experiments as a rapid tissue assessment tool and digestion quality control or as a technique to maximize output from limited samples and use of TMT or LF quantification as methods for larger amounts of tumor tissue with the selection being driven mainly by instrument time limitations. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifiers PXD004682, PXD004683, PXD004684, and PXD005733.
© 2017 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data-independent acquisition; Discovery proteomics; Label-free quantification; Lung squamous cell carcinoma; TMT

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28195392      PMCID: PMC5606153          DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201600300

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteomics        ISSN: 1615-9853            Impact factor:   3.984


  44 in total

1.  Identification of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for non-small cell lung cancer by proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Fengwei Tan; Ying Jiang; Nan Sun; Zhaoli Chen; Yongzhuang Lv; Kang Shao; Ning Li; Bin Qiu; Yibo Gao; Baozhong Li; Xiaogang Tan; Fang Zhou; Zhen Wang; Dapeng Ding; Jiwen Wang; Jian Sun; Jie Hang; Susheng Shi; Xiaoli Feng; Fuchu He; Jie He
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Identification and Characterization of Potential Biomarkers by Quantitative Tissue Proteomics of Primary Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chiung-Hung Hsu; Chia-Wei Hsu; Chuen Hsueh; Chih-Liang Wang; Yi-Cheng Wu; Chih-Ching Wu; Chin-Ching Liu; Jau-Song Yu; Yu-Sun Chang; Chia-Jung Yu
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Primary tumor xenografts of human lung adeno and squamous cell carcinoma express distinct proteomic signatures.

Authors:  Yuhong Wei; Jiefei Tong; Paul Taylor; Dan Strumpf; Vladimir Ignatchenko; Nhu-An Pham; Naoki Yanagawa; Geoffrey Liu; Igor Jurisica; Frances A Shepherd; Ming-Sound Tsao; Thomas Kislinger; Michael F Moran
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Quantitative proteomics profiling of primary lung adenocarcinoma tumors reveals functional perturbations in tumor metabolism.

Authors:  Maria Pernemalm; Luigi De Petris; Rui M Branca; Jenny Forshed; Lena Kanter; Jean-Charles Soria; Philippe Girard; Pierre Validire; Yudi Pawitan; Joost van den Oord; Vladimir Lazar; Sven Påhlman; Rolf Lewensohn; Janne Lehtiö
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.466

5.  Single-shot proteomics using capillary zone electrophoresis-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry with production of more than 1250 Escherichia coli peptide identifications in a 50 min separation.

Authors:  Guijie Zhu; Liangliang Sun; Xiaojing Yan; Norman J Dovichi
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  A cross-platform toolkit for mass spectrometry and proteomics.

Authors:  Matthew C Chambers; Brendan Maclean; Robert Burke; Dario Amodei; Daniel L Ruderman; Steffen Neumann; Laurent Gatto; Bernd Fischer; Brian Pratt; Jarrett Egertson; Katherine Hoff; Darren Kessner; Natalie Tasman; Nicholas Shulman; Barbara Frewen; Tahmina A Baker; Mi-Youn Brusniak; Christopher Paulse; David Creasy; Lisa Flashner; Kian Kani; Chris Moulding; Sean L Seymour; Lydia M Nuwaysir; Brent Lefebvre; Frank Kuhlmann; Joe Roark; Paape Rainer; Suckau Detlev; Tina Hemenway; Andreas Huhmer; James Langridge; Brian Connolly; Trey Chadick; Krisztina Holly; Josh Eckels; Eric W Deutsch; Robert L Moritz; Jonathan E Katz; David B Agus; Michael MacCoss; David L Tabb; Parag Mallick
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Blood-based lung cancer biomarkers identified through proteomic discovery in cancer tissues, cell lines and conditioned medium.

Authors:  Charles E Birse; Robert J Lagier; William FitzHugh; Harvey I Pass; William N Rom; Eric S Edell; Aaron O Bungum; Fabien Maldonado; James R Jett; Mehdi Mesri; Erin Sult; Elizabeth Joseloff; Aiqun Li; Jenny Heidbrink; Gulshan Dhariwal; Chad Danis; Jennifer L Tomic; Robert J Bruce; Paul A Moore; Tao He; Marcia E Lewis; Steve M Ruben
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.988

8.  MS-GF+ makes progress towards a universal database search tool for proteomics.

Authors:  Sangtae Kim; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Triple SILAC quantitative proteomic analysis reveals differential abundance of cell signaling proteins between normal and lung cancer-derived exosomes.

Authors:  David J Clark; William E Fondrie; Austin Yang; Li Mao
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Reproducibility of Differential Proteomic Technologies in CPTAC Fractionated Xenografts.

Authors:  David L Tabb; Xia Wang; Steven A Carr; Karl R Clauser; Philipp Mertins; Matthew C Chambers; Jerry D Holman; Jing Wang; Bing Zhang; Lisa J Zimmerman; Xian Chen; Harsha P Gunawardena; Sherri R Davies; Matthew J C Ellis; Shunqiang Li; R Reid Townsend; Emily S Boja; Karen A Ketchum; Christopher R Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Henry Rodriguez; Tao Liu; Sangtae Kim; Jason E McDermott; Samuel H Payne; Vladislav A Petyuk; Karin D Rodland; Richard D Smith; Feng Yang; Daniel W Chan; Bai Zhang; Hui Zhang; Zhen Zhang; Jian-Ying Zhou; Daniel C Liebler
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.466

View more
  1 in total

1.  Managing a Large-Scale Multiomics Project: A Team Science Case Study in Proteogenomics.

Authors:  Paul A Stewart; Eric A Welsh; Bin Fang; Victoria Izumi; Tania Mesa; Chaomei Zhang; Sean Yoder; Guolin Zhang; Ling Cen; Fredrik Pettersson; Yonghong Zhang; Zhihua Chen; Chia-Ho Cheng; Ram Thapa; Zachary Thompson; Melissa Avedon; Marek Wloch; Michelle Fournier; Katherine M Fellows; Jewel M Francis; James J Saller; Theresa A Boyle; Y Ann Chen; Eric B Haura; Jamie K Teer; Steven A Eschrich; John M Koomen
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.