OBJECTIVE: The present study tested the feasibility of training peers with spinal cord injury (SCI) to learn brief action planning (BAP), an application of motivational interviewing principles, to promote physical activity to mentees with SCI. METHOD: Thirteen peers with SCI attended a half-day BAP workshop. Using a one-arm, pre-, post-test design, feasibility to learn BAP was assessed in terms of peers' (1) BAP and motivational interviewing spirit competence; (2) training satisfaction; and (3) motivations to use BAP as assessed by measures of the theory of planned behavior constructs. Measures were taken at baseline, immediately post-training, and 1 month follow up. RESULTS: Following the training, participants' BAP and motivational interviewing competence significantly increased (P's < 0.05, d's > 2.27). Training satisfaction was very positive with all means falling above the scale midpoint. Participants' perceived behavioral control to use BAP increased from baseline to post (P < 0.05, d = 0.91) but was not maintained at follow up (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Training peers with a SCI to learn to use BAP is feasible. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: BAP is a tool that can be feasibly learned by peers to promote physical activity to their mentees.
OBJECTIVE: The present study tested the feasibility of training peers with spinal cord injury (SCI) to learn brief action planning (BAP), an application of motivational interviewing principles, to promote physical activity to mentees with SCI. METHOD: Thirteen peers with SCI attended a half-day BAP workshop. Using a one-arm, pre-, post-test design, feasibility to learn BAP was assessed in terms of peers' (1) BAP and motivational interviewing spirit competence; (2) training satisfaction; and (3) motivations to use BAP as assessed by measures of the theory of planned behavior constructs. Measures were taken at baseline, immediately post-training, and 1 month follow up. RESULTS: Following the training, participants' BAP and motivational interviewing competence significantly increased (P's < 0.05, d's > 2.27). Training satisfaction was very positive with all means falling above the scale midpoint. Participants' perceived behavioral control to use BAP increased from baseline to post (P < 0.05, d = 0.91) but was not maintained at follow up (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Training peers with a SCI to learn to use BAP is feasible. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: BAP is a tool that can be feasibly learned by peers to promote physical activity to their mentees.
Authors: Steve Martino; Gregory S Brigham; Christine Higgins; Steve Gallon; Thomas E Freese; Lonnetta M Albright; Eric G Hulsey; Laurie Krom; Susan A Storti; Harold Perl; Cathrine D Nugent; Denise Pintello; Timothy P Condon Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2010-06
Authors: Heather L Gainforth; Amy E Latimer-Cheung; Spencer Moore; Peter Athanasopoulos; Kathleen A Martin Ginis Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2015-06
Authors: Hardeep Singh; Carol Y Scovil; Karen Yoshida; Sarah Oosman; Anita Kaiser; Catharine Craven; Susan Jaglal; Kristin E Musselman Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-02-25 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Donna Patricia Manca; Carolina Fernandes; Eva Grunfeld; Kris Aubrey-Bassler; Melissa Shea-Budgell; Aisha Lofters; Denise Campbell-Scherer; Nicolette Sopcak; Mary Ann O'Brien; Christopher Meaney; Rahim Moineddin; Kerry McBrien; Ginetta Salvalaggio; Paul Krueger Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-09-26 Impact factor: 4.430