Y Gong1, C Y Xu1, J R Wang1, X H Hu1, D Hong2, X Ji1, W Shi1, H X Chen2, H B Wang3, X M Wu1. 1. Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China. 2. Department of Orthopedics, Taizhou Hospital, Linhai 317000, China. 3. State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Abstract
Inhibitors of phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) are widely used to treat erectile dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension in clinics. PDE5, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), and protein kinase G (PKG) are important components of the non-canonical Wnt signaling. This study aimed to investigate the effect of PDE5 inhibition on canonical Wnt signaling and osteoblastogenesis, using both in vitro cell culture and in vivo animal models. In the in vitro experiments, PDE5 inhibition resulted in activation of cGMP-dependent protein kinase 2 and consequent inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase 3β phosphorylation, destabilization of cytosolic β-catenin and the ultimate suppression of canonical Wnt signaling and reduced osteoblastic differentiation in HEK293T and C3H10T1/2 cells. In animal experiments, systemic inhibition of PDE5 suppressed the activity of canonical Wnt signaling and osteoblastogenesis in bone marrow-derived stromal cells, resulting in the reduction of bone mass in wild-type adult C57B/6 mice, significantly attenuated secreted Frizzled-related protein-1 (SFRP1) deletion-induced activation of canonical Wnt signaling and excessive bone growth in adult SFRP1(-/-) mice. Together, these results uncover a hitherto uncharacterized role of PDE5/cGMP/PKG signaling in bone homeostasis and provide the evidence that long-term treatment with PDE5 inhibitors at a high dosage may potentially cause bone catabolism.
Inhibitors of phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE5) are widely used to treat erectile dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension in clinics. PDE5, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), and protein kinase G (PKG) are important components of the non-canonical Wnt signaling. This study aimed to investigate the effect of PDE5 inhibition on canonical Wnt signaling and osteoblastogenesis, using both in vitro cell culture and in vivo animal models. In the in vitro experiments, PDE5 inhibition resulted in activation of cGMP-dependent protein kinase 2 and consequent inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase 3β phosphorylation, destabilization of cytosolic β-catenin and the ultimate suppression of canonical Wnt signaling and reduced osteoblastic differentiation in HEK293T and C3H10T1/2 cells. In animal experiments, systemic inhibition of PDE5 suppressed the activity of canonical Wnt signaling and osteoblastogenesis in bone marrow-derived stromal cells, resulting in the reduction of bone mass in wild-type adult C57B/6 mice, significantly attenuated secreted Frizzled-related protein-1 (SFRP1) deletion-induced activation of canonical Wnt signaling and excessive bone growth in adult SFRP1(-/-) mice. Together, these results uncover a hitherto uncharacterized role of PDE5/cGMP/PKG signaling in bone homeostasis and provide the evidence that long-term treatment with PDE5 inhibitors at a high dosage may potentially cause bone catabolism.
In the canonical Wnt (Wnt/β-catenin (β-cat)) signaling
cascade, Wnt binds to Frizzled (Frz) receptors and the low-density lipoprotein
receptor-related protein (LRP) 5 or 6, thereby activating dishevelled, suppressing the
glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) activity and inhibiting
phosphorylation of β-cat at Thr41, Ser37, and Ser33 sites. The stabilized
cytosolic β-cat enters the nucleus and consequently activates its
downstream target genes via lymphoid enhancer-binding factor-1 (Lef-1) and T-cell
factors.[1, 2] This signaling is fine-tuned in part via a negative feedback
mechanism involving secreted and transmembrane Wnt inhibitors and activators, secreted
Frz-related proteins (SFRPs), and Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1).[3, 4]Canonical Wnt signaling is critical not only to bone development in embryogenesis but
also to the maintenance of bone mass during adult life.[5] The initial evidence came from the discoveries that in humans
loss- or gain-of-function mutations in LRP5 were linked with the
osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome and a high-bone-density syndrome,
respectively.[6, 7, 8] Subsequent studies in mice showed
that Wnt signaling might promote ossification by inducing the differentiation of
bone-forming osteoblasts, suppressing the development of bone-resorbing osteoclasts, and
driving the differentiation of multi-potent stem cells toward an osteoblast cell
fate.[9]Non-canonical Wnt signaling is β-cat independent and consists of two main
pathways: the Rho small GTPases-mediated planar cell polarity pathway and the
Wnt/Ca2+ pathway,[10]
involved in various aspects of cell fate differentiation and cell movement.
Non-canonical Wnt signaling has profound effects on tissue morphogenesis in a variety of
vertebrate species.[10] The potential role for
non-canonical Wnt signaling in bone formation has been investigated recently in limited
studies, which have shown that the non-canonical Wnt-Gαq/11-PKC pathway
operates in mammalian osteoprogenitors to promote osteoblast development, and that Wnt16
exhibits a stimulatory effect on bone metabolism.[11,
12, 13]
Nevertheless, the molecular events in the non-canonical Wnt signaling regulation of bone
development and homeostasis have yet to be further elucidated.Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are a large family of enzymes that cleave cyclic nucleotides.
To date, 11 PDE subtypes have been identified, among which PDE5 has been most
extensively studied. PDE5, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), and cGMP-dependent
protein kinase (PKG) are among the major components of the non-canonical Wnt signaling
pathway and are involved in the regulation of intracellular Ca2+
concentration.[14, 15] It is now well established that PDE5 degrades
3'-5′- cGMP and its inhibition leads to an increase in intracellular cGMP
levels and activation of protein kinase G (PKG), resulting in a decrease in
Ca2+ influx and consequent relaxation of smooth muscles, which
produces the therapeutic effects in clinical erectile dysfunction (ED) and pulmonary
hypertension (PH).[14] Currently, little is
known regarding the involvement of PDE5 in Wnt signaling regulation of bone formation
and homeostasis. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of PDE5
inhibition on canonical Wnt signaling and bone mass.
Results
Involvement of PDE5 and PKG in canonical Wnt signaling
To examine the possibility of PDE5 and PKG in canonical Wnt signaling, we
determined the effects of PDE5 and PKG inhibitors, and PDE5- and PKG-specific
siRNAs on Lef1 reporter activity in 293 T cells. The two PDE5 inhibitors (i.e.,
tadalafil and vardenafil) used inhibited the Lef1-luciferase activity in a
dose-dependent manner; at 10 μM, tadalafil and vardenafil
decreased the reporter activity by 58 and 30%, respectively, in the
presence of control L cell-conditioned medium (L), and by 42 and 60%,
respectively, in the presence of Wnt3a-expressing cell-conditioned medium (Wnt3a)
(Figure 1a and Supplementary
Figure 1a). In contrast, KT5823, a potent inhibitor of PKG, dose
dependently induced the Lef1-luciferase activity in 293 T cells; at
5 μM, it increased the reporter activity by 2.4- and
1.5-fold, respectively, in the presence of control L cell-conditioned medium and
Wnt3a-expressing cell-conditioned medium (Figure 1b).
Neither tadalafil nor KT5823 at the indicated concentrations affected the
apoptosis of either 293 T cells or C3H10T1/2 cells, after 24 h
treatments (Supplementary Figure 1c–e). To
further confirm the specificity of PDE5 and PKG inhibitors in regulation of
canonical Wnt signaling, we transfected the cells with either PDE5a or PKG siRNA
and determined the Lef1 reporter activities. Wnt3a affected neither the cGMP
levels nor the PDE5a expression (Figure 1e and
Supplementary Figure 1b). PDE5a siRNA decreased
PDE5a expression by ~60% at the protein level and suppressed
Lef1-luciferase activity by 15 and 45% in the presence of control L
cell-conditioned medium and Wnt3a-expressing cell-conditioned medium, respectively
(Figures 1c and e). PKG1 and PKG2 siRNAs, each
lone, reduced PKG1 and PKG2 protein contents by 60 and 90%, respectively,
whereas the combination of PKG1 and PKG2 siRNAs reduced PKG1 and PKG2 protein
contents by 70 and 80%, respectively (Figure
1f). Silencing of PKG2 but not PKG1 resulted in a decrease in
Lef1-luciferase activities by 20 and 33% in the presence of control L
cell-conditioned medium and Wnt3a-expressing cell-conditioned medium,
respectively, and knockdown of both PKG1 and PKG2 decreased Lef1-luciferase
activities by ~70 and 75% in the presence of the two conditioned media,
respectively (Figure 1d). Thus, inhibition of PDE5
negates canonical Wnt signaling, in line with this observation, and suppression of
PKG, especially PKG2, induces canonical Wnt signaling in either the presence or
absence of Wnt3a.
Figure 1
PDE5 and PKG2 regulates canonical Wnt signaling in 293T cells. (a and
b) PDE5 inhibitor tadalafil and PKG inhibitor KT5823 affect the Lef1
luciferase activity. After co-transfection with the Lef1 luciferase and Renilla
luciferase plasmids, 293T cells were treated with indicated concentrations of
either tadalafil or KT5823 for 24 h in the presence of either control L
cell-conditioned medium (L) or Wnt3a-expressing cell-conditioned medium (Wnt3a).
(c and d) PDE5a, PKG1, and PKG2 siRNAs affect the Lef1 luciferase
activity. After co-transfection with the reporter constructs and respective
siRNAs, 293T cells were further cultured for 24 h in the presence of
L(−) or Wnt3a (+) conditional medium. (e and f) Protein
levels of PDE5a, PKG1, and PKG2 in cells transfected with siRNAs. The signal form
first band was defined as 1. *P<0.05, **P<0.01
versus L medium and vehicle treatments (or control siRNA);
†P<0.05, ‡P<0.01
versus Wnt3a medium and vehicle treatments (or control siRNA)
Effects of PDE5 inhibition on β-cat expression and
stabilization
Given that β-cat is the central signal transducer of the Wnt
signaling pathway, we evaluated the effect of PDE5 inhibition on
β-cat messenger RNA (mRNA) abundance and protein content, and
stabilization in 293 T cells, to further assess the possible involvement of PDE5
in Wnt signaling. PDE5 inhibitor tadalafil did not significantly change
β-cat mRNA levels at either 5 or 10 μM but
attenuated Wnt3a-induced increases in β-cat protein levels in
whole-cell lysates, cytosolic, and nuclear fractions by 58, 60, and 65%,
respectively, at 10 μM (Supplementary
Figure 2a and Figure 2a). Immunostaining
further confirmed the effect of tadalafil on β-cat protein content;
at 10 μM, tadalafil decreased both cytosolic and nuclear
β-cat protein levels in response to recombinant Wnt3a protein
(Figure 2b). Thus, inhibition of PDE5 negates
canonical Wnt signaling through decreasing β-cat levels.
Figure 2
β-Catenin levels in 293T cells treated with PDE5 inhibitor in the
presence or absence of Wnt3a. (a) Tadalafil reduced β-catenin
protein levels. Western blot analyses of β-catenin levels in whole
cells, cytosolic, and nuclear fractions of 293T cells treated with vehicle
(−) or tadalafil (+) at 10 μM in the presence of
L(−) or Wnt3a (+) conditional medium for 24 h. (b)
Immunofluorescence and confocal images of 293T cells treated with dimethyl
sulfoxide (DMSO) or tadalafil at 10 μM in the presence or
absence of recombinant Wnt3a for 24 h
Phosphorylation of β-cat at Ser45 by casein kinase-1 (CK1) and at
Thr41, Ser37, and Ser33 by GSK3β regulates its stabilization in the
cytosol, and the phosphorylated β-cat is recognized by E3 ubiquitin
ligase and undergoes proteolytic degradation.[16] To determine the role of PDE5 in the stabilization of
β-cat, we assessed changes in β-cat phosphorylation
in 293T cells treated with tadalafil at 10 μM, in either the
presence or absence of Wnt3a. Wnt3a slightly decreased the phosphorylation of
β-cat at Ser45, whereas tadalafil showed no significant effect
(Supplementary Figure 2b). Phosphorylation of
β-cat at Ser33, Ser37, and Thr41 was reduced by Wnt3a
(80%) but induced by tadalafil (1.4-fold), and tadalafil was capable of
reversing the negative effect of Wnt3a on β-cat phosphorylation
(3-fold) (Figure 3a). In contrast, Wnt3a increased
(2.5-fold) but tadalafil decreased (40%) GSK3β
phosphorylation at Ser9, and tadalafil was effective to attenuate the
Wnt3a-induced GSK3β phosphorylation (60%) (Figure 3a).
Figure 3
Stabilization of β-catenin affected by PDE5/cGMP/PKG2
signals in 293T cells. (a and b) Tadalafil and 8-Br-cGMP affected
the activation of GSK3β and stabilization of
β-catenin. 293T cells were pretreated with vehicle (−) or
tadalafil (+) at 10 μM for 3 h, then were
stimulated with L(−) or Wnt3a (+) medium in the presence of vehicle or
tadalafil (10 μM) for further 30 min.
p33-β-catenin, total β-catenin,
p-GSK3β (Ser9), and total GSK3β were measured by
western blottings. (c) PKG2 siRNA inhibited the activation of
GSK3β and stabilization of β-catenin. 293T cells
were transfected with siRNA for 48 h, then were stimulated with L or Wnt3a
medium in the presence of vehicle or tadalafil (10 μM) for
further 30 min. (d and e) Effects of GSK3β
inhibitor or its siRNA on Lef1 luciferase activities in 293T cells treated with or
without tadalafil in the presence of L or Wnt3a conditional medium. (f)
Protein levels of GSK3β in 293T cells transfected with its siRNAs.
(g) Co-immunoprecipitation of endogenous GSK3β and PKG2.
After various treatments, 293T cells were subjected to immunoprecipitation and
western blot analyses by using the indicated antibodies. The signal from the first
band was defined as 1. *P<0.05, **P<0.01
versus vehicle treatment and in the presence or absence of L medium
and control siRNA; †P<0.05,
‡P<0.01 versus Wnt3a medium, vehicle,
and control siRNA treatments
We also assessed the possible involvement of cGMP in the destabilization of
β-cat. We observed that the cGMP analog, 8-Br-cGMP, increased
β-cat phosphorylation by 40% at Thr41, Ser37, and Ser33,
but decreased GSK3β phosphorylation by 50% at Ser9 in 293T
cells (Figure 3b). Conversely, Wnt3a resulted in a
decrease in β-cat phosphorylation (80%) but an increase in
GSK3β phosphorylation (2-fold) (Figure
3b). These effects of Wnt3a were robustly reversed by 8-Br-cGMP
(1.5-fold for β-cat and 70% for GSK3β) (Figure 3b). We further evaluated the potential role for
PKG2 in β-cat stabilization using the siRNA technology.
PKG2-specific siRNA, PKG2si, reduced the expression of PKG2 by 70% and
decreased β-cat phosphorylation by 40%, but increased
GSK3β phosphorylation by 60% (Figure
3c). Moreover, PKG2si synergistically attenuated Wnt3a's
inhibitory effect on β-cat phosphorylation (66%) and
potentiated Wnt3a's induction of GSK3β phosphorylation
(50%) (Figure 3c).Finally, we performed reporter assays and co-immunoprecipitation to confirm
GSK3β signaling as a downstream event of PDE5/cGMP/PKG2
signals in the regulation of β-cat stabilization.
GSK3β inhibitor, SB216763, increased Lef1-luciferase activity but
showed no significant effect in the presence of tadalafil in 293T cells (Figure 3d). However, the presence of tadalafil had no
effect on Wnt3a induction of Lef1-luciferase activity in 293T cells expressing
GSK3β siRNA (GSK3βsi) where GSK3β
protein content was decreased by 60~80% (Figures 3e and
f). In cells treated with Wnt3a alone, protein complex precipitated
with a GSK3β antibody contained a considerable amount of PKG2;
however, in cells treated with other test agents, protein complex contained a
small amount of PKG2 in addition to GSK3β, as expected (Figure 3g). Taken together, these observations suggest that
activation of PKG2 by inhibition of PDE5 may suppress canonical Wnt signaling
through inducing GSK3β-mediated phosphorylation of
β-cat at Thr41, Ser37, and Ser33 sites.
Effects of PDE5 inhibition on osteoblastic differentiation
To examine the role of PDE5 in osteoblastogenesis, we tested the effect of
tadalafil on β-cat expression and osteoblastic differentiation in
the presence or absence of Wnt3a in embryonic fibroblast C3H10T1/2 cells.
Similar to what was observed in 293T cells, tadalafil at 10 μM
attenuated Wnt3a-induced increases in β-cat protein content in the
whole-cell lysate, cystosolic, and nuclear by 48, 50, and 47%,
respectively, in C3H10T1/2 cells (Figure 4a).
Moreover, Wnt3a not only increased mRNA levels of canonical Wnt signaling target
genes including Lef1 and Dkk1 (Figures 4f and
g) but also increased the differentiation of embryonic fibroblasts to
osteoblasts as demonstrated by increases in mRNA levels of osteoblastogenic
markers including alkaline phosphatase (AP), ostrix (OSX), and Runt-related
transcription factor 2 (Runx2), as well as AP activities and mineralized nodule
formation (Figures 4b–i). Although tadalafil
alone affected neither mRNA levels of AP, OSX, and Runx2 nor AP activities, it
slightly reduced the baseline mRNA levels of Lef1 and Dkk1, and the mineralized
nodule formation (Figures 4b–i). In contrast,
tadalafil reduced not only Wnt3a-induced increases in mRNA levels of Lef1
(72%) and DKK1 (75%) but also of osteoblastic markers including AP
(74%), OSX (86%), and Runx2 (67%), and AP activities
(33%) and formation of mineralized nodules (30%) (Figures 4b–i). Thus, in C3H10T1/2 cells, inhibition of PDE5
suppresses not only the canonical Wnt signaling but also the osteoblastogenesis in
response to Wnt3a.
Figure 4
Inhibition of PDE5 suppresses the differentiation of osteoblast. (a)
Tadalafil reduced β-catenin protein levels. Western blot analyses of
β-catenin levels in whole cells, cytosolic, and nuclear fractions
of C3H10T1/2 cells treated with vehicle (−) or tadalafil (+) at
10 μM in the presence of L(−) or Wnt3a (+)
conditional medium for 24 h. (b–g) Expression of
osteoblast differential markers and target gene of canonical Wnt signaling in
C3H10T1/2 cells treated with tadalafil in the presence of L or Wnt3a medium.
Cells were cultured in L or Wnt3a medium in the presence of vehicle or tadalafil
at 10 μM for 48 h followed by AP activity analyses and
quantitative RT-PCR assays for mRNA levels of AP, OSX, Runx2, Lef, and Dkk1.
(h and i) Tadalafil reduced the formation of mineralized nodules
in response to Wnt3a medium. Cells were cultured in L or Wnt3a medium in the
presence of ascorbic acid, β-glycerophosphate, and dexamethasone.
After incubation for 21 days, cells were detected for bone nodules by alizarin-red
staining and quantitative determination. The signal for the first western band was
defined as 1. *P<0.05, **P<0.01
versus L medium and vehicle treatments.
†P<0.05, ‡P<0.01
versus Wnt3a medium and vehicle treatments
Decreases in bone mass after systemic inhibition of PDE5 in
vivo
To assess the potential role of inhibition of PDE5 in bone mass in vivo,
we first evaluated the effect of tadalafil on osteoblastogenesis and
Wnt/β-cat signaling in wild-type adult (2 months) C57BL/6
mice. Orally administered for 2 months at 45 or75 mg/kg daily that was
20- and 32-fold higher than the clinical dosage for ED (10 mg daily) and 5-
and 8-fold higher than the clinical dosage for PH (40 mg daily),
[17, 18] tadalafil robustly decreased the mass of cancellous bone
but not of cortical bone as revealed by morphological and histological analyses
(Figure 5a). Three-dimensional reconstruction of
the distal femur using micro computed tomography (μCT) confirmed that
tadalafil at both 45 and 75 mg/kg resulted in decreases in bone mineral
density (BMD) by 30 and 35%, in trabecular bone volume (BMTV) by 42 and
48%, in trabecular number (TbN) by 35 and 50%, but increases in
trabecular separation (TbSp) by 58 and 97%, respectively, while it had no
effect on trabecular thickness (TbTh), when compared with the vehicle treatment
(Figures 5a–c, and Supplementary Figure 3a and b). Moreover, tadalafil at 45 and
75 mg/kg reduced mRNA levels of Lef1 (34 and 49%, respectively)
and Dkk1 (24 and 56%, respectively) in bone marrow-derived stromal cells
(BMSCs) (Figures 5f and g). In line with the
inhibition of canonical signaling, tadalafil dose dependently reduced mRNA levels
of osteoblastogenic markers including AP (18 and 38%, respectively) and
Runx2 (18 and 43%, respectively) (Figures 5d and
e). Finally, tadalafil robustly decreased the numbers of not only Lef-
and Dkk1-positive cells but also AP- and Runx2-positive cells as revealed by
immunohistochemical staining of longitudinal sections of the distal femur (Figure 5h). Taken together, these results demonstrate that
systemic inhibition of PDE5 may lead to robust inhibition of osteoblastogenesis
and consequent reduction in bone mass possibly through inhibition of canonical Wnt
signaling in adult mice.
Figure 5
Tadalafil reduced bone mass in the adult wild-type mice. (a) Tadalafil
reduced bone mass of distal femur in the adult mice. H&E staining of paraffin
sections and μCT analyses of the distal femur from mice
intragastrically treated with normal saline or indicated dosages of tadalafil
daily for 2 months. (b and c) Quantification of bone parameters from
three-dimensional reconstruction μCT. (d–g)
Tadalafil treatment reduced the mRNA levels of osteoblast marker genes
(AP and RunX2) and target genes of canonical Wnt signaling
(Lef1 and Dkk1) in BMSCs compared with the vehicle treatment.
(h) Immunohistochemistry analyses of AP, Runx2, Lef1, and DKK1
expression in the distal femur of mice treated with vehicle or indicated dosages
of tadalafil. *P<0.05, **P<0.01
versus vehicle treatment.
We next assessed the effect of tadalafil on osteoblastogenesis and Wnt signaling
in 2-month-old SFRP1 knockout (SFRP1−/−) mice. At the
baseline level, SFRP1−/− mice had a significantly
higher mass of cancellous bone but not cortical bone as compared with
SFRP1+/− mice, as revealed by histological analysis
of the longitudinal sections of the distal femur. At an oral dose of
75 mg/kg daily for 2 months, tadalafil robustly decreased the mass of
cancellous bone but not in cortical bone in SFRP1−/−
mice (Figure 6a). Three-dimensional reconstruction of
the distal femur using μCT further confirmed that there were
significant increases in BMD (2.1-fold), BMTV (2.3-fold), and TbN (1.5-fold) but
not in TbTh and TbSp in SFRP1−/− mice as compared with
SFRP1+/− mice, and that tadalafil treatment resulted
in significant decreases in BMD (38%), BMTV (28%), and TbN
(47%), but not in TbTh and TbSp as compared with the vehicle treatment
(Figures 6a–c, and Supplementary Figure 4c and d). Likewise, BMSCs from
SFRP1−/− mice formed much more mineralized nodules
than those from SFRP1+/− mice (1.4-fold), and tadalafil
attenuated SFRP1 knockout-associated excessive formation of mineralized nodules by
~25% over vehicle (Figures 6d and e). Moreover,
BMSCs from SFRP1−/− mice exhibited higher transcription
activities of Lef1 and Dkk1 (13- and 14-fold, respectively) than those
from SFRP1+/− mice, whereas systemic treatment with
tadalafil in SFRP1−/− mice robustly attenuated the
transcription of these genes (39 and 54%, respectively; Figures 6h and i). Similarly, BMSCs from
SFRP1−/− mice also exhibited higher transcriptional
activities of osteoblast differential markers including AP and Runx2 (24- and
26-fold, respectively) than those from SFRP1+/− mice,
and systemic treatment with tadalafil in SFRP1−/− mice
robustly attenuated the transcription of these markers (21 and 16%,
respectively; Figures 6f and g). As demonstrated by
immunohistochemistry staining of the sections of the distal femur, deletion of
SFRP1 in mice led to a robust increase in the numbers of Lef1- and Dkk1-positive
cells, as well as AP- and Runx2-positive cells, and that systemic treatment with
tadalafil in SFRP1−/− mice robustly attenuated the
increases in the number of not only Lef1- and Dkk1-positive cells but also AP- and
Runx2-positive cells (Figure 6j). As indicated by
tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining, neither deletion of SFRP1 nor
systemic treatment with tadalafil had any significant effect on the number of
TRAP-positive cells in SFRP1−/− mice (Supplementary Figure 3a and 3b). Together, these results
further confirm that systemic inhibition of PDE5 specifically reduces the
excessive bone growth derived from forced activation of canonical Wnt signaling in
adult SFRP1−/− mice.
Figure 6
Tadalafil reduced bone mass in the adult SFRP1−/− mice.
(a) Tadalafil reduced bone mass of the distal femur in the adult
SFRP1−/− mice. H&E staining of paraffin sections
and μCT analyses of the distal femur from
SFRP1+/− or SFRP1−/− mice
intragastrically administrated with normal saline or indicated dosage of tadalafil
daily for 2 months. (b and c) Quantification of bone parameters from
three-dimensional reconstruction μCT. (d and e)
Formation of mineralized nodules in BMSCs from the above mice. BMSCs were isolated
from the indicated mice and were cultured in the media containing ascorbic acid,
β-glycerophosphate, and dexamethasone in the presence or absence
of indicated concentration of tadalafil. After incubation for 21 days, cells were
detected for bone nodules by alizarin-red staining and quantitative determination.
(f–i) Tadalafil treatment reduced the mRNA levels of
osteoblast marker genes (AP and RunX2) and target genes of
canonical Wnt signaling (Lef1 and Dkk1) in BMSCs from the femur
and tibia of above mice. (h) Immunohistochemistry analyses of AP, Runx2,
Lef1, and DKK1 expression in the distal femur of
SFRP1+/− or SFRP1−/− mice
treated with vehicle or indicated dosages of tadalafil. *P<0.05,
**P<0.01 versus vehicle treatment.
Discussion
By using wild-type C57BL/6 and SFRP1 knockout mice, we have uncovered that the
PDE/cGMP/PKG2 signaling operates in conjunction with
GSK3β-mediated β-cat stabilization to regulate canonical
Wnt signaling in maintenance of bone mass in adult mice in vivo. Using 293T
and C3H10T1/2 cells, we have shown that inhibition of PDE5 induces cGMP-dependent
PKG2, which activates GSK3β and thereby destabilizes
β-cat in the cytosol, resulting in inhibition of canonical Wnt
signaling and consequent reduction of osteoblastic differentiation in vitro
(Figure 7).
Figure 7
Schematic graph showing the proposed model for PDE5 inhibition-regulating
canonical Wnt signaling and bone homeostasis. Inhibition of PDE5 by its
inhibitors, such as tadalafil and vardenafil, results in elevation of cGMP and
activation of cGMP-dependent protein kinase 2, which further activates
GSK3β and thereby destabilizes β-catenin in the
cytosol, leading to suppression of canonical Wnt signaling and the consequent
reduction of osteoblastogenesis and bone mass. PDE5, phosphodiesterase 5; cGMP,
cyclic guanosine monophosphate; GTP, guanosine-5′-triphosphate; GC, guanylyl
cyclase; 5′-GMP, guanosine-5′-monophosphate; PKG, cGMP-dependent
protein kinase; Dkk1, Dickkopf-1; SFRP, secreted Frz-related proteins; Frz,
Frizzled; LRP5/6, low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 or 6; G,
G protein; GSK3β, glycogen synthase kinase 3β; APC,
adenomatous polyposis coli; β-cat, β-catenin; TCF,
T-cell factors; Lef, lymphoid enhancer-binding factor
In one of our previous studies, we have demonstrated that Wnt3a through LRP5/6,
Dvl, and most likely Frz receptors, activates a signaling module composed of
Gαq/11βγ-PI3K-Rac1-JNK2, resulting in stabilization
of β-cat through phosphorylation at Ser191 and Ser605, and consequent
localization to the nucleus.[16] Here we show
that PDE5 inhibition leads to activation of cGMP/PKG2, which destabilizes
β-cat and consequently suppresses canonical Wnt signaling,
supporting a role for the non-canonical pathway in the regulation of canonical Wnt
signaling.[19] The mechanisms
underlying the activation of canonical versus non-canonical pathways by Wnt
ligands are not fully understood.[11] It has
been suggested that the Frz2/Gαi/PDE5/cGMP/PKG signaling module
is an important component of non-canonical Wnt signaling in the activation of
intracellular Ca2+ transient.[15] Here we report that PDE5/cGMP/PKG signals are also
involved in canonical Wnt signaling. It seems that non-canonical Wnt signaling and
canonical Wnt signaling operate interactively and the binary distinctions of these
two Wnt pathways have come under scrutiny. As overexpression of Frz4 in HEK293 cells
or Frz5 in Xenopus embryos is sufficient to transduce canonical signaling by
Wnt5a,[20, 21] the specificity of the underlying signaling complexes may be
dictated by the Frz receptor(s).A previous study has observed that activation of Frz2 induces the cGMP-dependent
phosdiesterase and decreases the intracellular cGMP levels,[15] suggesting that Wnt3a fails to activate Frz2, and that
PDE5/cGMP/PKG signals regulate canonical Wnt signaling independently of
Wnt3a. The current study has shown that PDE5/cGMP/PKG2 signals regulate the
stabilization of β-cat at the protein but not the mRNA level.
Inconsistent to this observation, Li et al.[22] and Tinsley et al.[23] have shown that both non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug,
sulindac sulfide (SS), and PDE5 inhibitor, tadalafil, inhibit PDE5 activity and
increase cGMP levels, resulting in PKG activation, decreased proliferation, and
apoptosis through transcriptional suppression of β-cat, but not its
proteolytic degradation in colon cancer cells, and more recently, Tinsley et
al.[24] have demonstrated that SS may
trigger β-cat protein degradation and suppress β-cat gene
transcription through increased phosphorylation in humanbreast cancer cells. The
inconsistency is possibly due to the use of different cell types in the previous
studies (i.e., cancer cells) and this study (i.e., normal cells).Inhibition of PDE5 and activation of cGMP/PKG2 induce the phosphorylation of
β-cat at Thr41, Ser37, and Ser33 but not at Ser45, suggesting that
GSK3β but not CK1 may be downstream of the PDE5/cGMP/PKG2
signaling module. This notion is further supported by the findings that knockdown of
PKG2 is sufficient to activate the phosphorylation of GSK3β and the
stabilization of β-cat. Finally, PKG2 and GSK3β
co-existing within one immunoprecipitated complex prompts us to speculate that PKG2
directly phosphorylates GSK3β in the complex. In line with this
speculation, several recent reports have shown physical interactions between PKG2 and
GSK3β. In ATDC5 cells, PKG2 directly phosphorylates
GSK3β to promote the hypertrophic differentiation.[25] In UMR106 cells, PKG2 also phosphorylates the
GSK3β at Ser9, and the apparent Km of PKG2 for
GSK3β is about 0.15 xM.[26] Thus, the present study has identified a mechanism in which
activation of cGMP/PKG2 by inhibition of PDE5 results in
GSK3β-mediated destabilization of β-cat and consequent
suppression of canonical Wnt signaling.The role for canonical Wnt signaling in the embryonic development of bone is well
established, but the function in maintaining the bone homeostasis in adulthood is
less clear.[27, 28] With regard to non-canonical Wnt signaling, little is known
regarding its role in bone development and homeostasis in both embryogenesis and
adulthood.[11] Consistent with the role
of PDE5/cGMP/PKG2 signaling in Wnt3a-induced osteoblastogenesis in
vitro, systemic administration of a PDE5 inhibitor, tadalafil, reduces bone
mass not only in normal but also in SFRP1−/− knockout
adult mice in this study. The severe phenotype after tadalafil treatment reflects the
importance of PDE5 activities in the maintenance of bone homeostasis. Endogenous Wnt
signaling plays an important role in bone formation through stimulating the
osteoblastogenesis and suppressing the adipogenesis and
osteoclastogenesis.[29] Our in
vivo analyses show that: (1) inhibition of PDE5 reduces the trabecular bone
but not the cortical bone, which is identical to the phenotypes of SFRP1 or LRP5
gain- and loss-of-function;[30, 31, 32] (2)
inhibition of PDE5 leads to the robust inhibition of Lef1 and Dkk1
transcription in BMSCs; (3) inhibition of PDE5 almost abolishes the SFRP1
knockout-producing overgrowth of bone; and (4) neither inhibition of PDE5 nor SFRP1
gain-of-function affects the osteoclastogenic activities. Together, these in
vivo observations imply that inhibition of PDE5 attenuates not only the
osteoblastogenic differentiation in response to Wnt3a but also the activities of
canonical Wnt signaling, suggesting that inhibition of PDE5 reduces
osteoblastogenesis possibly through suppressing canonical Wnt signaling.Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) is the enzyme responsible for producing NO and NO
activates soluble guanylyl cyclases to increase the intracellular cGMP levels and
activate PKG.[14] Consistent with our
findings, previous studies have demonstrated that mice lacking endothelial NOS
exhibit profound abnormalities in bone formation and a significant delay in
osteoblastic differentiation,[33, 34] and that mice lacking either PKG2 or PKG1 may
develop severe phenotypes; however, analyses of the skeletons of PKG2 but not PKG1
mutants have revealed the obvious defects in chondrogenesis but not in
osteoblastogenesis.[25, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39] It is likely that PKG2 and PKG1 play a functional
redundancy in osteoblastogenesis.In summary, the present study has demonstrated that PDE5 inhibition may cause bone
mass loss involving non-canonical Wnt pathway, which operates interactively with
canonical Wnt signaling in a way to destabilize β-cat through a
cGMP/PKG2/GSK3β signaling-dependent mechanism. Given that
PDE5 inhibitors are commonly used in patients with ED and PH, our findings may have
significant clinical implications in alerting physicians of putative adverse effect
of PDE5 inhibitors.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals and antibodies
Tadalafil and vardenafil were obtained from Selleckchem (Houston, TX, USA).
KT5823, 8-Br(Bromo)-cGMP, Alizarin Red S, and SB216763 were from Sigma (St Louis,
MO, USA). Recombinant murineWnt3a protein was purchased from R&D System
(Minneapolis, MN, USA). Antibodies against PKG1, PKG2, Lamin B, Dkk1, IgG,
β-actin, and protein A/G PLUS-Agarose were from Santa Cruz
Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Antibodies against p-β-cat
(Ser33/37/Thr41), p-β-cat (Ser45), β-cat,
p-GSK3β (Ser9) and GSK3β were from Cell Signaling
(Danvers, MA, USA). Antibodies against AP and RunX2 were purchased from Abcam
(Cambridge, UK), and the antibody against Lef1 was from Proteintech (Chicago, IL,
USA). The IRDye 680 and 800 second antibodies were from LI-COR Bioscience
(Lincoln, Nebraska) and the Alexa 555-conjugated secondary antibodies were from
Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY, USA). Cyclic GMP Direct Immunoassay kits were
obtained from Abcam and TRAP staining kits were from Sigma.
Cell culture and conditioned medium preparation
C3H10T1/2 cells, Wnt3a-expressing and control L cells, and HEK293T cells were
all obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). For maintenance, C3H10T1/2 cells
and HEK293T cells were cultured, respectively, in Basal Medium Eagle (Life
Technologies) and Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life
Technologies) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS, Life
Technologies). Primary bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) were isolated from the
femur and tibia, and cultured in alpha Minimum Essential Media (Life Technologies)
with 15% FCS as described previously.[11] Conditional media were prepared from Wnt3a-expressing and
control L cells, respectively, as described previously.[16]
Transient transfection and dual-luciferase assay
SV40 large T-antigen-expressing HEK cells (293T cells) were plated onto 24-well
plates. Next day, they were transfected with 2 μg Lef1 reporter
construct using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent and 0.02 μg Renilla
luciferase construct (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) for 6 h in the absence of
serum.[40] In some cases, the cells
were co-transfected with siRNA oligonucleotides targeting the test genes
PDE5a, PKG1, PKG2, and GSK3β (see
Supplementary Table 1 for the specific sequence
information), Lef1 reporter construct and Renilla construct. Transfectants were
then cultured in a 1 : 2 diluted conditioned medium prepared from
control L cells or Wnt3a-expressing cells in the presence of tadalafil and/or
vardenafil for 48 h. At the end of the designated culture, cell lysates
were prepared and dual-luciferase assay was performed according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Promega). The firefly luciferase activity was
normalized to the Renilla luciferase activity.
Western blotting, immunoprecipitation and immunocytochemistry
293T and C3H10T1/2 cells were plated 1 × 104 and 1.5 ×
104 cells/cm2 overnight, after a variety of
treatments. Cytosolic and nuclear fractions of cells were prepared by using NE-PER
Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA)
as per the manufacturer's instructions. β-Actin and Lamin-B
were used as the internal standards for the cytosolic and nuclear fractions,
respectively. Western blot analysis and immunoprecipitation were performed using
standard protocols and the immunoreactive signals for the proteins of interest
were quantitated using the LI-COR Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR
Bioscience) and ImageJ (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). 293T cells seeded on chamber slides
(Nalge Nunc International, Rochester, NY, USA) at 0.75 ×
104/cm2 and cultured in regular medium overnight and
in serum-free medium for 12 h. After pre-treatment with tadalafil for
2 h, serum-starved cells were further stimulated with recombinant murineWnt3a protein at 100 ng/ml in fresh serum-free medium for
30 min. Cells were then immunostained with primary antibodies against
β-catenin and subsequently counterstained with
4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Immunoreactive protein signals were examined
by confocal microscopy.
Osteoblast differentiation assay and quantitative RT-PCR
C3H10T1/2 cells were seeded onto six-well plates. At confluence, cells were
stimulated with conditioned medium prepared from control L or Wnt3a-expressing
cells for 48 h in the presence of vehicle or tadalafil. AP activity was
determined and expressed as nanomoles of p-nitrophenol formed per minute per
milligram of protein as previously described.[41]. For mineralization assays, confluent cells were
incubated in the presence of 50 mg/ml ascorbic acid and 50 mM
β-glycerophosphate for 21 days. Total RNA was extracted using
TRIzol reagent (Takara Biotechnology (Dalian) Co., Ltd., Dalian, China). mRNA
levels of osteoblast markers and target genes of canonical Wnt signaling including
Dkk1, Lef1, AP, Runx2, and Osx
were determined by real-time PCR as previously described.[42, 43] GAPDH was included as
an internal control and the relative levels of mRNA species of interest were
calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method.[44] The primers used in our PCR analysis are
presented in the Supplementary Information
(Supplementary Table 2).
Mouse strains, treatments and histological assessment
Male C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co.
(Shanghai, China) and founder SPRP1+/− mouse strains
were gifted by Dr Akihiko Shimono.[45]
Two-month-old mice were orally administrated with tadalafil daily at 0, 45 or
75 mg/kg for 2 months. We used μCT (μCT 40,
Scanco Medical AG, Brüttisellen, Switzerland) for three-dimensional
reconstruction and quantification of bone parameters, and reconstructed each image
from one hundred 16-μm slices immediately below the growth plate, with
a threshold of 200.[46] Histological
examination and immunohistochemistry staining were performed on paraffin sections
(4 μm) after decalcification. Immunohistochemistry staining
was performed by using the Histostain-Plus Kit (Kangwei Reagents, Beijing, China)
as described previously.[47] After
sequential treatments, tissue sections were sequentially incubated with normal
serum for 30 min, control IgG and primary antibodies against AP, Runx2,
Lef1, or Dkk1 for 2 h, and then HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for
30 min. The diaminobenzidine solution was used for development of brown
color and sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. The quantitative
histomorphometry was performed using the Osteomeasure Analysis System
(OsteoMetrics, Inc., Decatur, GA, USA). The Animal Studies Committee at Zhejiang
University approved all mouse procedures.
Statistical analysis
Experiments were repeated at least three times. Numerical data were expressed as
means±S.D. and analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey–Kramer multiple
comparisons test. Differences were considered significant when P<0.05.
The SPSS statistical package (IBM, North Castle, NY, USA) was used.
Authors: K E Armour; K J Armour; M E Gallagher; A Gödecke; M H Helfrich; D M Reid; S H Ralston Journal: Endocrinology Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 4.736
Authors: Y Gong; R B Slee; N Fukai; G Rawadi; S Roman-Roman; A M Reginato; H Wang; T Cundy; F H Glorieux; D Lev; M Zacharin; K Oexle; J Marcelino; W Suwairi; S Heeger; G Sabatakos; S Apte; W N Adkins; J Allgrove; M Arslan-Kirchner; J A Batch; P Beighton; G C Black; R G Boles; L M Boon; C Borrone; H G Brunner; G F Carle; B Dallapiccola; A De Paepe; B Floege; M L Halfhide; B Hall; R C Hennekam; T Hirose; A Jans; H Jüppner; C A Kim; K Keppler-Noreuil; A Kohlschuetter; D LaCombe; M Lambert; E Lemyre; T Letteboer; L Peltonen; R S Ramesar; M Romanengo; H Somer; E Steichen-Gersdorf; B Steinmann; B Sullivan; A Superti-Furga; W Swoboda; M J van den Boogaard; W Van Hul; M Vikkula; M Votruba; B Zabel; T Garcia; R Baron; B R Olsen; M L Warman Journal: Cell Date: 2001-11-16 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Randall D Little; John P Carulli; Richard G Del Mastro; Josée Dupuis; Mark Osborne; Colleen Folz; Susan P Manning; Pamela M Swain; Shan-Chuan Zhao; Brenda Eustace; Michelle M Lappe; Lia Spitzer; Susan Zweier; Karen Braunschweiger; Youssef Benchekroun; Xintong Hu; Ronald Adair; Linda Chee; Michael G FitzGerald; Craig Tulig; Anthony Caruso; Nia Tzellas; Alicia Bawa; Barbara Franklin; Shannon McGuire; Xavier Nogues; Gordon Gong; Kristina M Allen; Anthony Anisowicz; Arturo J Morales; Peter T Lomedico; Susan M Recker; Paul Van Eerdewegh; Robert R Recker; Mark L Johnson Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2001-12-03 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Lynn M Boyden; Junhao Mao; Joseph Belsky; Lyle Mitzner; Anita Farhi; Mary A Mitnick; Dianqing Wu; Karl Insogna; Richard P Lifton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-05-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J Mao; J Wang; B Liu; W Pan; G H Farr; C Flynn; H Yuan; S Takada; D Kimelman; L Li; D Wu Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Peter V N Bodine; Weiguang Zhao; Yogendra P Kharode; Frederick J Bex; Andre-Jean Lambert; Mary Beth Goad; Tripti Gaur; Gary S Stein; Jane B Lian; Barry S Komm Journal: Mol Endocrinol Date: 2004-02-19
Authors: Masaki Kato; Millan S Patel; Regis Levasseur; Ivan Lobov; Benny H-J Chang; Donald A Glass; Christine Hartmann; Lan Li; Tae-Ho Hwang; Cory F Brayton; Richard A Lang; Gerard Karsenty; Lawrence Chan Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2002-04-15 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: I-Hsuan Chen; Liang Xue; Chuan-Chih Hsu; Juan Sebastian Paez Paez; Li Pan; Hillary Andaluz; Michael K Wendt; Anton B Iliuk; Jian-Kang Zhu; W Andy Tao Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: A Aversa; S Fittipaldi; V M Bimonte; F Wannenes; V Papa; D Francomano; E A Greco; A Lenzi; S Migliaccio Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2015-07-02 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Se-Min Kim; Charit Taneja; Helena Perez-Pena; Vitaly Ryu; Anisa Gumerova; Wenliang Li; Naseer Ahmad; Ling-Ling Zhu; Peng Liu; Mehr Mathew; Funda Korkmaz; Sakshi Gera; Damini Sant; Elina Hadelia; Kseniia Ievleva; Tan-Chun Kuo; Hirotaka Miyashita; Li Liu; Irina Tourkova; Sarah Stanley; Daria Lizneva; Jameel Iqbal; Li Sun; Ronald Tamler; Harry C Blair; Maria I New; Shozeb Haider; Tony Yuen; Mone Zaidi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-06-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Y B Pan; Y Gong; H F Ruan; L Y Pan; X K Wu; C Tang; C J Wang; H B Zhu; Z M Zhang; L F Tang; C C Zou; H B Wang; X M Wu Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 8.469
Authors: Yusuf Atalay; Nedim Gunes; Mehmet Dervis Guner; Veysi Akpolat; Mustafa Salih Celik; Rezzan Guner Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 4.162