Literature DB >> 25429250

Unravelling associations between unassigned mass spectrometry peaks with frequent itemset mining techniques.

Trung Nghia Vu1, Aida Mrzic1, Dirk Valkenborg2, Evelyne Maes3, Filip Lemière4, Bart Goethals5, Kris Laukens1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mass spectrometry-based proteomics experiments generate spectra that are rich in information. Often only a fraction of this information is used for peptide/protein identification, whereas a significant proportion of the peaks in a spectrum remain unexplained. In this paper we explore how a specific class of data mining techniques termed "frequent itemset mining" can be employed to discover patterns in the unassigned data, and how such patterns can help us interpret the origin of the unexpected/unexplained peaks.
RESULTS: First a model is proposed that describes the origin of the observed peaks in a mass spectrum. For this purpose we use the classical correlative database search algorithm. Peaks that support a positive identification of the spectrum are termed explained peaks. Next, frequent itemset mining techniques are introduced to infer which unexplained peaks are associated in a spectrum. The method is validated on two types of experimental proteomic data. First, peptide mass fingerprint data is analyzed to explain the unassigned peaks in a full scan mass spectrum. Interestingly, a large numbers of experimental spectra reveals several highly frequent unexplained masses, and pattern mining on these frequent masses demonstrates that subsets of these peaks frequently co-occur. Further evaluation shows that several of these co-occurring peaks indeed have a known common origin, and other patterns are promising hypothesis generators for further analysis. Second, the proposed methodology is validated on tandem mass spectrometral data using a public spectral library, where associations within the mass differences of unassigned peaks and peptide modifications are explored. The investigation of the found patterns illustrates that meaningful patterns can be discovered that can be explained by features of the employed technology and found modifications.
CONCLUSIONS: This simple approach offers opportunities to monitor accumulating unexplained mass spectrometry data for emerging new patterns, with possible applications for the development of mass exclusion lists, for the refinement of quality control strategies and for a further interpretation of unexplained spectral peaks in mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aberrant peaks; Frequent itemset mining; Pattern mining; Unassigned masses

Year:  2014        PMID: 25429250      PMCID: PMC4243190          DOI: 10.1186/s12953-014-0054-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteome Sci        ISSN: 1477-5956            Impact factor:   2.480


  19 in total

1.  FindPept, a tool to identify unmatched masses in peptide mass fingerprinting protein identification.

Authors:  Alexandre Gattiker; Willy V Bienvenut; Amos Bairoch; Elisabeth Gasteiger
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Unmatched masses in peptide mass fingerprints caused by cross-contamination: an updated statistical result.

Authors:  Qinxue Ding; Lin Xiao; Shaoxiang Xiong; Yufeng Jia; Haiping Que; Yaojun Guo; Shaojun Liu
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  Iterative data analysis is the key for exhaustive analysis of peptide mass fingerprints from proteins separated by two-dimensional electrophoresis.

Authors:  Frank Schmidt; Monika Schmid; Peter R Jungblut; Jens Mattow; Axel Facius; Klaus Peter Pleissner
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Use of matrix clusters and trypsin autolysis fragments as mass calibrants in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  William A Harris; Dariusz J Janecki; James P Reilly
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  A report on the ESF workshop on quality control in proteomics.

Authors:  Lennart Martens
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2010-04-30

6.  Protease-dependent fractional mass and peptide properties.

Authors:  Harald Barsnes; Ingvar Eidhammer; Véronique Cruciani; Svein-Ole Mikalsen
Journal:  Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.067

Review 7.  Proteomics quality and standard: from a regulatory perspective.

Authors:  Qiang Gu; Li-Rong Yu
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Identification of yeast proteins from two-dimensional gels: working out spot cross-contamination.

Authors:  K C Parker; J I Garrels; W Hines; E M Butler; A H McKee; D Patterson; S Martin
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.535

9.  PeaksPTM: Mass spectrometry-based identification of peptides with unspecified modifications.

Authors:  Xi Han; Lin He; Lei Xin; Baozhen Shan; Bin Ma
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank: current status.

Authors:  A Bairoch; B Boeckmann
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  MESSAR: Automated recommendation of metabolite substructures from tandem mass spectra.

Authors:  Youzhong Liu; Aida Mrzic; Pieter Meysman; Thomas De Vijlder; Edwin P Romijn; Dirk Valkenborg; Wout Bittremieux; Kris Laukens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.