Literature DB >> 25427135

Mobility and low contrast trip hazard avoidance using augmented depth.

Chris McCarthy1, Janine G Walker, Paulette Lieby, Adele Scott, Nick Barnes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated a novel visual representation for current and near-term prosthetic vision. Augmented depth emphasizes ground obstacles and floor-wall boundaries in a depth-based visual representation. This is achieved by artificially increasing contrast between obstacles and the ground surface via a novel ground plane extraction algorithm specifically designed to preserve low-contrast ground-surface boundaries. APPROACH: The effectiveness of augmented depth was examined in human mobility trials compared against standard intensity-based (Intensity), depth-based (Depth) and random (Random) visual representations. Eight participants with normal vision used simulated prosthetic vision with 20 phosphenes and eight perceivable brightness levels to traverse a course with randomly placed small and low-contrast obstacles on the ground. MAIN
RESULTS: The number of collisions was significantly reduced using augmented depth, compared with intensity, depth and random representations (48%, 44% and 72% less collisions, respectively). SIGNIFICANCE: These results indicate that augmented depth may enable safe mobility in the presence of low-contrast obstacles with current and near-term implants. This is the first demonstration that an augmentation of the scene ensuring key objects are visible may provide better outcomes for prosthetic vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25427135     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/1/016003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  6 in total

1.  Harmonization of Outcomes and Vision Endpoints in Vision Restoration Trials: Recommendations from the International HOVER Taskforce.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Joseph F Rizzo; Ian L Bailey; August Colenbrander; Gislin Dagnelie; Duane R Geruschat; Philip C Hessburg; Chris D McCarthy; Matthew A Petoe; Gary S Rubin; Philip R Troyk
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 2.  An update on retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren N Ayton; Nick Barnes; Gislin Dagnelie; Takashi Fujikado; Georges Goetz; Ralf Hornig; Bryan W Jones; Mahiul M K Muqit; Daniel L Rathbun; Katarina Stingl; James D Weiland; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Gaze Compensation as a Technique for Improving Hand-Eye Coordination in Prosthetic Vision.

Authors:  Samuel A Titchener; Mohit N Shivdasani; James B Fallon; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.283

4.  A Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis: Interim Clinical Trial Results.

Authors:  Matthew A Petoe; Samuel A Titchener; Maria Kolic; William G Kentler; Carla J Abbott; David A X Nayagam; Elizabeth K Baglin; Jessica Kvansakul; Nick Barnes; Janine G Walker; Stephanie B Epp; Kiera A Young; Lauren N Ayton; Chi D Luu; Penelope J Allen
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Caricaturing faces to improve identity recognition in low vision simulations: How effective is current-generation automatic assignment of landmark points?

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Rachel A Robbins; Xuming He; Nick Barnes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Real-world indoor mobility with simulated prosthetic vision: The benefits and feasibility of contour-based scene simplification at different phosphene resolutions.

Authors:  Jaap de Ruyter van Steveninck; Tom van Gestel; Paula Koenders; Guus van der Ham; Floris Vereecken; Umut Güçlü; Marcel van Gerven; Yagmur Güçlütürk; Richard van Wezel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.